Skip to main content
Log in

‘The life of man, solitary, poore, nasty, brutish, and short’: Discussion of the paper by Rootzén and Zholud

  • Published:
Extremes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Cox, D.R.: Partial likelihood. Biometrika 62, 269–76 (1975)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Einmahl, J.J., Einmahl, J.H.J., de Haan, L.F.M.: Limits to human life span through extreme value theory. Tilburg University Center for Economic Research Discussion Paper 2017-051, https://pure.uvt.nl/portal/files/19635604/2017_051.pdf (2017)

  • Feifel, J., Genz, M., Pauly, M.: Who Wants to Live Forever? An Analysis of the Maximum Lifespan in the US Preprint: Institute of Statistics, Ulm University (2017)

  • Gampe, J.: Human mortality beyond age 110. In: Maier, H., Gampe, J., Jeune, B., Vaupel, J.W., Robine, J.-M. (eds.) Supercentenarians, pp 219–230. Springer, Berlin (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rootzén, H., Zholud, D.: Human life is unlimited — but short. Extremes 20, 713–728 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Thatcher, A.R.: The long-term pattern of adult mortality and the highest attained age (with Discussion). J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. A 162, 5–43 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank Sonia Alouini, Holger Rootzén, John Einmahl and Sebastian Engelke for comments and Thomas Mikosch for the opportunity to contribute to this discussion. The work was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. C. Davison.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Davison, A.C. ‘The life of man, solitary, poore, nasty, brutish, and short’: Discussion of the paper by Rootzén and Zholud. Extremes 21, 365–372 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10687-018-0329-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10687-018-0329-5

Keywords

Navigation