Abstract
The new generation interferometric arrays such as the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA) are composed of a large number of telescopes and their configurations are optimized for Fourier plane (a.k.a. uv-plane) coverage. As a consequence, solving for the missing information in the uv-plane is becoming less critical and the imaging algorithms can be revisited. The situation is getting similar to that encountered with single filled aperture telescopes and it is becoming possible to make images in a direct way. In this article a new weighting method is introduced to obtain “pseudo-clean” images without using prior information to solve for the Fourier transform of the source. This method is similar but not equivalent to the successive application of robust weighting and tapering at different scales. The idea is to weight the data to compensate for the imperfect distribution of natural weights in the uv-plane. The price to pay for this direct imaging technique is that the final point spread function (PSF or beam) may not follow a simple analytical shape such as a Gaussian (but this is also the case in optical astronomy) and some sensitivity is lost (but this is the case with any imaging algorithm in interferometry). Two parameters are introduced to control the trade-off between imaging quality and sensitivity, namely a threshold parameter and a coupling parameter. This method is applied to simulated ALMA observations with 16, 32 and 50 antennas. As expected this method is found to be more efficient with more antennas and for more compact configurations because the uv-plane coverage is more complete. With 50 antennas in compact configuration it is possible to reduce the amplitude of the inner sidelobes (outer sidelobes) by a factor >6 (>2) compared to natural weighting for ~10 % loss in sensitivity, leading to sidelobes lower than 1.6 % of the main lobe peak value. With 16 antennas only, the method can still be used to reduce the inner sidelobes of a compact configuration by a factor >2 for ~10 % loss in sensitivity. This method can therefore be used with the new generation interferometric arrays to efficiently produce images without relying on any assumptions about the sources. The dynamic range of the resulting images depend on the number of telescopes in the array, the source size and the acceptable level of sensitivity loss.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boone, F.: Interferometric array design: optimizing the locations of the antenna pads. A&A 377, 368 (2001)
Boone, F.: Interferometric array design: distributions of Fourier samples for imaging. A&A 386, 1160 (2002)
Briggs, D.S.: The New Mexico Institute Of Mining and Technology. PhD Thesis (1995)
Cornwell, T., Braun, R.: In astronomical society of the pacific conference series. In: Perley, R.A., Schwab, F.R., Bridle, A.H. (eds.) Synthesis Imaging in Radio Astronomy, vol. 6, p. 167. (1989)
Högbom, J.A.: Aperture synthesis with a non-regular distribution of interferometer baselines. A&AS 15, 417 (1974)
Lannes, A., Anterrieu, É., Bouyoucef, K.: Fourier interpolation and reconstruction via Shannon-type techniques: I. regularization principle. J. Mod. Opt. 41, 1537 (1994)
Lannes, A., Anterrieu, E., Marechal, P.: Clean and wipe. A&AS 123, 183 (1997)
Narayan, R., Nityananda, R.: Maximum entropy image restoration in astronomy. ARA&A 24, 127 (1986)
Thompson, A.R., Moran, J.M., Swenson, G.W. (eds.): Interferometry and synthesis in radio astronomy, 2007. John Wiley & Sons (2007)
Acknowledgements
I thank the two anonymous referees for their insightful comments and suggestions that helped to considerably improve the quality of the paper. I am grateful to the ALMA AIVC team members and in particular to Richard Hills, Stéphane Léon-Tanne, Ruediger Kneissl, Ed Fomalont, and Eric Villard for their interest in this work and their useful remarks.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Boone, F. Weighting interferometric data for direct imaging. Exp Astron 36, 77–104 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10686-012-9322-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10686-012-9322-1