Skip to main content
Log in

Reduced ambiguity calibration for LOFAR

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Experimental Astronomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Interferometric calibration always yields non unique solutions. It is therefore essential to remove these ambiguities before the solutions could be used in any further modeling of the sky, the instrument or propagation effects such as the ionosphere. We present a method for LOFAR calibration which does not yield a unitary ambiguity, especially under ionospheric distortions. We also present exact ambiguities we get in our solutions, in closed form. Casting this as an optimization problem, we also present conditions for this approach to work. The proposed method enables us to use the solutions obtained via calibration for further modeling of instrumental and propagation effects. We provide extensive simulation results on the performance of our method. Moreover, we also give cases where due to degeneracy, this method fails to perform as expected and in such cases, we suggest exploiting diversity in time, space and frequency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Boyd, S., Vendenberghe, L.: Convex Optimization. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen, B., Petropulu, A.P.: Frequency domain blind MIMO system identification based on second- and higher order statistics. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 49(1), 1677–1688 (2001)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cotton, W.D.: Polarimetry. In: Zensus, J.A., Diamond, P.J., Napier, P.J. (eds.) ASP Conference Series, Very Long Baseline Interferometry and the VLBA, vol. 82, pp. 289–308 (1995)

  4. Hamaker, J.P.: Understanding radio polarimetry IV: the full-coherency analogue of scalar selfcalibration. Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. 143(3), 515–534 (2000)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hamaker, J.P., Bregman, J.D., Sault, R.J.: Understanding radio polarimetry, paper I. Astron. Astrophys. Suppl. 117(137), 96–109 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Higham, N.J.: Functions of Matrices: Theory and Computation. SIAM, Philadelphia (2008)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Intema, H.T., van der Tol, S., Cotton, W.D., Cohen, A.S., van Bemmel, I.M., Rottgering, H.J.A.: Ionospheric calibration of low frequency radio interferometric observations using the peeling scheme. I. Method description and first results. Astron. Astrophys. 501(3), 1185–1205 (2009)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lourakis, M.I.A.: Levmar: Levenberg–Marquardt nonlinear least squares algorithms in C/C+ +. http://www.ics.forth.gr/~lourakis/levmar/ (2004)

  9. van der Tol, S., van der Veen, A.J.: Ionospheric calibration for the LOFAR radio telescope. In: IEEE International Symposium on Signals, Circuits and Systems, 2007 ISSCS 2007, pp. 1–4 (2007)

  10. Yatawatta, S., Petropulu, A.P., Dattani, R.: Blind channel estimation using fractional sampling. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 53(2), 363–371 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Ger de Bruyn and Wim Brouw for initial comments and suggestions. We also thank the anonymous reviewers for the careful review and helpful comments that enabled us to enhance this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarod Yatawatta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yatawatta, S. Reduced ambiguity calibration for LOFAR. Exp Astron 34, 89–103 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10686-012-9300-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10686-012-9300-7

Keywords

Navigation