Skip to main content
Log in

In the grip of the big telescope age

  • Historical Review
  • Published:
Experimental Astronomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

George Ellery Hale was a man of many dreams. One of his most persistent was to find the means to collect as much light as possible, but there is another element in his designs for the modern astrophysical observatory that has even greater significance, as it defines and distinguishes the practice of astrophysics from that of classical astronomy. Here we examine factors that either impeded or drove the acceptance of reflectors over refractors around the turn of the twentieth century at the outset of what may best be called the “Hale era.” This commenced in the late nineteenth century, when the first large multi-focus photographic reflectors emerged during the reign of the great refractors. It lasted through to the onset of World War II when astronomical practice was dominated by ten reflectors with mirrors between 60 and 100 in., and was about to add one more whose surface area would almost double that of all the rest combined. We will touch upon how design choice reflected both scientific priorities and technological limitations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adams, W.S., Kohlschûtter, A.: Some spectral criteria for the determination of absolute stellar magnitudes. Contr. Mt. Wilson Obs. 89, 1–14 (1914)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Adams, W.S.: Some results of a study of the spectra of Sirius, Procyon, and Arcturus with high dispersion. ApJ 33, 64–71 (1911) doi:10.1086/141829

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Adams, W.S.: Summary of the Year’s Work at Mount Wilson. PASP 43, 394–403 (1931). doi:10.1086/124172

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Adams, W.S.: Sunspot lines in the spectrum of Arcturus. ApJ 24, 69–77 (1906). doi:10.1086/141374

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Anon: Reflecting telescopes. Astron. Regist. 4, 318–319 (1866)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lockyer, N.: Meeting of the royal astronomical society. Astron. Regist. 22, 139–142; 142 (1884)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bell, L.: The Telescope. McGraw Hill, New York (1922)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bennett, J.A.: On the power of penetrating into space: the telescopes of William Herschel. J. Hist. Astr. 7, 75–108 (1976)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Berendzen, R.: Geocentric to heliocentric to galactocentric to acentric: the continuing assault to the egocentric. Vistas Astron. 17, 65–83 (1975). doi:10.1016/0083-6656(75)90049-5

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Blank, D., Andersen, G.: The telescope. Its history, technology, and future. J. Astron. Hist. Herit. 10, 247 (2007)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cattell, J.M. (ed.): Frank Lawton Olcott Wadsworth. Am. Men of Sci., 5th edn., p. 1157. The Science Press, New York (1933)

  12. Christie, W.H.M.: Award of the Gold Medal to Maurice Loewy. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 49, 247 (1889)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Clark, A.G.: Great telescopes of the future. A&A 12, 673–678 on 674–675 (1893)

    Google Scholar 

  14. DeVorkin, D.H.: Henry Norris Russell: Dean of American Astronomers. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2000)

  15. DeVorkin, D.H.: The discovery and exploitation of spectroscopic parallaxes. In: Philip, A.G.D., Van Altena, W.F., Upgren, A.R. (eds.) Anni Mirabiles: A Symposium Celebrating the 90th Birthday of Dorrit Hoffleit, pp. 17–24. L. Davis Press, Schenectady, NY (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Evans, D.S., Derral Mulholland, J.: Big and bright: a history of the McDonald observatory. University of Texas Press, Texas (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Florence, R.: The Perfect Machine: Building the Palomar Telescope. Harper-Collins, New York (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Forgan, J.B., et al.: Second Annual Report of the Visiting Committee of the Yerkes Observatory. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1902)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gingerich, O., Welther, B.: Harlow Shapley and the Cepheids. Sky Telesc. 70, 540 (1985)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Glass, I.S.: Victorian Telescope Makers: The Lives and Letters of Thomas and Howard Grubb. IOP (Institute of Physics Press), Bristol (1997)

  21. Hale, G.E.: Arthur Cowper Ranyard. ApJ 1, 168–169 (1895). doi:10.1086/140031

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hale, G.E.: Note on the Ranyard mounting for reflecting telescopes. ApJ 5, 148–149 (1897)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hale, G.E.: Ten Year’s Work of A Mountain Observatory. Carnegie Institution of Washington Publ 235, Washington, DC (1915)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hale, G.E.: The Study of Stellar Evolution. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1908)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hale, G.E.: T. Mendenhall, 1904. Hale Papers, Huntington Library and Archives, AIP Microfilm Edn.

  26. Hale, G.E.: On the comparative value of refracting and reflecting telescopes for astrophysical investigation. ApJ 5, 119–131 (1897). doi:10.1086/140317

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Jarrell, R.J.S.: Plaskett and the modern large reflecting telescope. J. Hist. Astr. 30, 359-390 (1999)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Jarrell, R.: The Telescope (1950). Encycl. Astron. Astrophys. 4, 3293–3298 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Johnson, H.L., Richards, W.L.: Optimum size of infrared photometric telescopes. ApJ 160, L111–L116 (1970). doi:10.1086/180540

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. Kapteyn, J.C.: The plan of selected Areas. In: Council Notes, MNRAS 74, pp. 348–352, on 348 (1914)

    Google Scholar 

  31. King, H.C.: H.C. King’s book: The History of the Telescope, 1959. Griffin, London. Reprinted, Dover Publishing, New York (1979)

  32. Lankford, J.: Amateurs vs. professionals: the controversy over telescope size in late Victorian science. Isis 72, 11–28 (1981). doi:10.1086/352648

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. Learner, R.: Astronomy though the Telescope. Van Nostrand, New York (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Lord Rosse to E. S. Holden, January 6, 1877. Holden Papers, Mary Lea Shane Archives, University of California, Santa Cruz

  35. MacRobert, A.: Death of amateur astronomy... or new birth? Sky Telesc. 116, 33 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Meadows, A.J.: Meadows’s book: Science and Controversy: A Biography of Sir Norman Lockyer. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (1972). Reprinted, MacMillan, London (2008)

  37. Meinel, A.B.: Design of reflecting telescopes. In: Kuiper, G., Middlehurst, B. (eds.) Stars and Stellar Systems, vol. 1, pp. 25–42 (1960)

  38. Misch, A., Sheehan, W.: Pioneering telescope turns 100. Sky Telesc. 116, 38–41 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Oke, J.B.: On the optimum size of optical telescopes. ApJ 162, L77–L78 (1970). doi:10.1086/180628

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. Osterbrock, D.E.: Pauper & Prince; Ritchey, Hale & Big American Telescopes, p. 68. Arizona, Tucson (1993)

  41. Panek, R.: Seeing and Believing: How the Telescope Opened our Eyes and Minds to the Heavens. Viking, New York (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Paul, R.: The Milky Way Galaxy and Statistical Cosmology 1890–1924. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1993)

  43. Pickering, E. C. to G. E. Hale, nd circa December 1901. Reprinted in Report of the Visiting Committee of the Yerkes Observatory, October 1902, private circulation. p. 20

  44. Pickering, E.C.: The future of astronomy. Pop. Sci. Mon. 75, 105–116 (1909)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Ritchey, G.W.: The two-foot reflecting telescope of the Yerkes Observatory. ApJ 217, 221 14 (November 1901)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Sandage, A.: The Mount Wilson Observatory, Breaking the Code of Cosmic Evolution. Volume 1 of the Centennial History of the Carnegie Institution of Washington, p. 161. Cambridge (2004)

  47. Steinheil, C.A.: On the advantages to be derived from the use of silver mirrors for reflecting telescopes, and on a novel mode of mounting such instruments. MNRAS 19, 56–60 (1858). Translated from AN 1138

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  48. Thomsen, I.L.: In the grip of the big telescope age. JRASC 29 238, 238–240 (1935). Reprinted from Southern Stars (February 1935)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Turner, H.H.: Modern astronomy, being some account of the revolution of the last quarter of a century, pp. 46–47, 124–129. Constable, Westminster (1901)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Van de Kamp, P.: The galactocentric revolution, a reminiscent narrative. PASP 77, 325–335 (1965). doi:10.1086/128228

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  51. Van Helden, A.: Building large telescopes, 1900–1950. In: Gingerich, O. (ed.) Astrophysics and Twentieth-century Astronomy to 1950 part A, pp. 134–152. The General History of Astronomy 4A. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Wadsworth, F.L.O.: On a new form of mounting for reflecting telescopes devised by the late Arthur Cowper Ranyard. ApJ 5, 132–134 (1897). doi:10.1086/140318

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  53. Wadsworth, F.L.O.: Review of G. Johnstone Stoney. On the equipment of the astrophysical observatory of the future. ApJ 4, 238–243 (1986). doi:10.1086/140275

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  54. Warner, D.J., Ariail, R.: Alvan Clark & Sons, Artists in Optics, 2nd edn. Willmann-Bell, Inc, Richmond (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  55. Watson, F.: Stargazer: The Life and Times of the Telescope, p. 211. DaCapo, Cambridge (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  56. Woodbury, D.O.: The Glass Giant of Palomar, revised edn. Dodd, Mead, New York (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  57. Wright, H., Warnow, J.N., Weiner, C. (eds.): The Legacy of George Ellery Hale, p. 42. MIT, Cambridge (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  58. Wright, H.: Explorer of the Universe: A Biography of George Ellery Hale, revised edn. American Institute of Physics, Woodbury, NY (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  59. Wright, H.: Palomar, The World’s Largest Telescope. MacMillan, New York (1952)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David H. DeVorkin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

DeVorkin, D.H. In the grip of the big telescope age. Exp Astron 25, 63–77 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10686-009-9146-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10686-009-9146-9

Keywords

Navigation