The emergence of language differences in artificial codes
- 391 Downloads
The paper studies how common codes of artificial language in communication are developed in the laboratory. We find that codes emerging from an environment with more variable spatial positions tend to use a limited set of symbols to represent positions, whereas codes emerging from an environment with more variable geometric shapes tend to discriminate among shapes. The paper also experimentally shows that “language” affects the way its “speakers” share the view about a novel figure.
KeywordsCommunication games Coordination Economics of language
JEL ClassificationC72 C92 Z1
We are grateful to the editor and two anonymous referees for thoughtful and constructive comments. We would also like to thank Te Bao, Andreas Blume, Keith Chen, Liang Guo, Wei Huang, Jaimie Lien, Eric van Damme, Songfa Zhong, and participants in many seminars and conferences for helpful comments. We thank financial support from the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology and Shanghai University of Finance and Economics. The paper builds on an earlier version of the working paper titled “An Economic Investigation of Linguistic Differences” as a joint effort with Wooyoung Lim, and still reflects our earlier collaboration.
Funding was provided by Shanghai University of Finance and Economics (start-up grant).
- Arrow, K. (1974). The limits of organization. New York, NY: Norton.Google Scholar
- Blume, A., DeJong, D., Kim, Y., & Sprinkle, G. (1998). Experimental evidence on the evolution of meaning of messages in sender–receiver games. American Economic Review, 88(5), 1323–1340.Google Scholar
- Bresnan, J. (1982). The mental representation of grammatical relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Cohen, H., & Lefebvre, C. (2005). Handbook of categorization in cognitive science. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
- Dessi, R., & Zhao, X. (2015). Overconfidence, stability and investments. TSE working paper (pp. 15–580).Google Scholar
- Fei, H. (1992). From the soil: The foundations of Chinese society. London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Gentner, D. (1982). Why nouns are learned before verbs: Linguistic relativity vs. natural partitioning. In S. A. Kuczaj (Ed.), Language development. Language, thought and culture (Vol. 2). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Greif, A., & Tabellini, G. (2012). The clan and the city: Sustaining cooperation in China and Europe. New York: Mimeo, Stanford University and Bocconi University.Google Scholar
- Haspelmath, M. (2001). The European linguistic area: Standard average European. An international handbook on language typology and language universals, 2, 1492–1510.Google Scholar
- He, T.-S., & Riyanto, Y. E. (2016). Pro-drop and pro-sociality: Experimental evidence. New York: Mimeo.Google Scholar
- Lipman, B. (2003). Language and economics. In N. Dimitri, M. Basili, & I. Gilboa (Eds.), Cognitive processes and rationality in economics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Nisbett, R. (2003). The geography of thought. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Whorf, B. (1956). Language, thought, and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. In J. B. Carroll (Ed.), Language, thought and reality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar