Advertisement

Experimental Economics

, Volume 17, Issue 4, pp 717–732 | Cite as

Dishonesty and charitable behavior

  • Doru CojocEmail author
  • Adrian Stoian
Original Paper

Abstract

We examine in the laboratory how having the opportunity to donate to a charity in the future affects the likelihood of engaging in dishonest behavior in the present. We also examine how charitable donations are affected by past ethical choices. First, subjects self-report their performance on a task, which provides them with an opportunity for undetected cheating. In the second stage they can donate some of the money earned in the first stage to a charity. Only subjects in the treatment group know about the opportunity to donate in the second stage. We find that more subjects cheat if they know they can donate some of the money to charity. We also find that subjects in treatment end up donating less to charity and that both honest and dishonest subjects donate less in treatment. We propose a new hypothesis that explains these results: past violations of social norms numb one’s conscience, leading to more antisocial behavior.

Keywords

Dishonesty Charity Donations Identity Guilt 

JEL Classification

D03 D63 D64 L31 

Supplementary material

10683_2014_9391_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (147 kb)
(PDF 147 kB)

References

  1. Andreoni, J. (2006). Philanthropy. In L. A. Gerard-Varet, S. C. Kolm, & J. M. Ythier (Eds.), Handbook of giving, reciprocity and altruism (pp. 1201–1269). Amsterdam: North-Holland/Elsevier. Google Scholar
  2. Camerer, C. F. (2003). Behavioral game theory: experiments in strategic interaction. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
  3. Carpenter, J., Connolly, C., & Myers, C. (2008). Altruistic behavior in a representative dictator experiment. Experimental Economics, 11(3), 282–298. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cassone, A., & Marchese, C. (1999). The economics of religious indulgences. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 155(3), 429–442. Google Scholar
  5. Cialdini, R. B., Darby, B. L., & Vincent, J. E. (1973). Transgression and altruism: a case for hedonism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 9(6), 502–516. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fischbacher, U., & Föllmi-Heusi, F. (2013). Lies in disguise. An experimental study on cheating. Journal of the European Economic Association, 11(3), 525–547. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gill, D., Prowse, V., & Vlassopoulos, M. (2012). Cheating in the workplace: an experimental study of the impact of bonuses and productivity. Working paper. Google Scholar
  8. Gneezy, U. (2005). Deception: the role of consequences. The American Economic Review, 95, 384–394. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gneezy, U., Imas, A., & Madarasz, K. (2012). Conscience accounting: emotional dynamics and social behavior. Working paper. Google Scholar
  10. Hibbert, S., Smith, A., Davies, A., & Ireland, F. (2007). Guilt appeals: persuasion knowledge and charitable giving. Psychology & Marketing, 24(8), 723–742. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hurkens, S., & Kartik, N. (2009). Would I lie to you? On social preferences and lying aversion. Experimental Economics, 12, 180–192. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kotchen, M. (2006). Green markets and private provision of public goods. Journal of Political Economy, 114(4), 816–834. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kuran, T. (1996). The discontents of Islamic economic morality. The American Economic Review, 86, 438–442. Google Scholar
  14. Lundquist, T., Ellingsen, T., Gribbe, E., & Johannesson, M. (2002). The aversion to lying. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 70, 81–92. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mazar, N., & Ariely, D. (2006). Dishonesty in everyday life and its policy implications. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 25, 117–126. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Monin, B., & Miller, D. T. (2001). Moral credentials and the expression of prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(1), 33–43. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sachdeva, S., Iliev, R., & Medin, D. L. (2009). Sinning saints and saintly sinners: the paradox of moral self-regulation. Psychological Science, 20(4), 523–528. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Economic Science Association 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsThe University of IowaIowa CityUSA
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsCalifornia State UniversityHaywardUSA

Personalised recommendations