Experimental Economics

, Volume 17, Issue 4, pp 586–614 | Cite as

Incentive effects of funding contracts: an experiment

Original Paper
  • 438 Downloads

Abstract

We examine the incentive effects of funding contracts on entrepreneurial effort and on allocative efficiency. We experiment with funding contracts that differ in the structure of investor repayment and, thus, in their incentives for the provision of entrepreneurial effort. Theoretically the replacement of a standard debt contract by a repayment-equivalent non-monotonic contract reduces effort distortions and increases efficiency. Likewise, distortions can be mitigated by replacing outside equity by a repayment-equivalent standard-debt contract. We test both hypotheses in the laboratory. Our results reveal that the incentive effects of funding contracts must be experienced before they are reflected in observed behavior. With sufficient experience, observed behavior is either consistent with or close to theoretical predictions and supports both hypotheses. If we allow for entrepreneur-sided manipulations of project outcomes, we find that non-monotonic contracts lose much of their appeal.

Keywords

Hidden information Funding contracts Incentives Experiment Standard debt contract Non-monotonic contract State manipulation 

JEL Classification

C91 D82 G21 

Supplementary material

10683_2013_9385_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (841 kb)
(PDF 841 kB)

References

  1. Aghion, P., & Howitt, P. (1992). A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica, 60(2), 323–351. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aghion, P., & Howitt, P. (1998). Endogenous growth theory. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar
  3. Baker, M., & Wurgler, J. (2012). Behavioral corporate finance: an updated survey. In G. M. Constantinides, M. Harris, & R. M. Stulz (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of finance (Vol. 2). Amsterdam: North-Holland. Google Scholar
  4. Baker, M., Ruback, R. S., & Wurgler, J. (2007). Behavioral corporate finance: a survey. In B. Espen Eckbo (Ed.), Handbook in corporate finance: empirical corporate finance. Amsterdam: North-Holland. Google Scholar
  5. Barro, R. J., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (2003). Economic growth (2nd ed.). Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar
  6. Brandt, J., & Charness, G. (2004). Do labour market conditions affect gift exchange? Some experimental evidence. The Economic Journal, 114, 684–708. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown, M., & Zehnder, C. (2007). Credit registries, relationship banking and loan repayment. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 39(8), 1883–1918. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown, M., & Zehnder, C. (2010). The emergence of information sharing in credit markets. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 19(2), 255–278. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. DeJong, D. V., Forsythe, R., & Lundholm, R. J. (1985). Ripoffs, lemons, and reputation formation in agency relationships: a laboratory market study. The Journal of Finance, 40(3), 809–820. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fehr, E., & Zehnder, C. (2006). Reputation and credit market formation (NCCR Finrisk Working Paper No. 179). Google Scholar
  11. Fehr, E., Kirchsteiger, G., & Riedl, A. (1993). Does fairness prevent market clearing? An experimental investigation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(2), 437–460. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fehr, E., Klein, A., & Schmidt, K. M. (2007). Fairness and contract design. Econometrica, 75(1), 121–154. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fischbacher, U. (2007). z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experimental Economics, 10, 171–178. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fischbacher, U., & Föllmi-Heusi, F. (2013). Lies in disguise. Journal of the European Economic Association, 11, 525–547. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Greiner, B. (2004). The Online Recruitment System ORSEE 2.0—a guide for the organization of experiments in economics (Working Paper Series in Economics, No. 10). University of Cologne. Google Scholar
  16. Innes, R. T. (1990). Limited liability and incentive contracting with ex ante action choices. Journal of Economic Theory, 52, 45–67. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Irlenbusch, B., & Sliwka, D. (2005). Transparency and reciprocal behavior in employment relations. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 56(3), 383–403. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kirchkamp, O., Reiß, J. P., & Sadrieh, K. (2008). A pure variation of risk in first-price auctions (METEOR Research Memorandum 08/050). Google Scholar
  19. Lazear, E. (2000). Performance pay and productivity. The American Economic Review, 90(5), 1346–1361. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Malmendier, U., & Tate, G. (2005). CEO overconfidence and corporate investment. The Journal of Finance, LX(6), 2661–2700. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mazar, N., Amir, O., & Ariely, D. (2008). The dishonesty of honest people: a theory of self-concept maintenance. Journal of Marketing Research, XLV, 633–644. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Milgrom, P. R. (1981). Good news and bad news: representation theorems and applications. Bell Journal of Economics, 13, 369–378. Google Scholar
  23. Niemeyer, C., Reiß, J. P., & Sadrieh, K. (2013). Reducing risk in experimental games and individual choice (Working Paper). Karlsruhe Institute of Technology. Google Scholar
  24. Reiß, J. P., & Wolff, I. (2012). Incentive effects of funding contracts: an experiment (TWI Research Paper Series, No. 78). University of Konstanz. Google Scholar
  25. Reiß, J. P., & Wolff, I. (2013). Funding of entrepreneurs: an experimental approach (Working Paper, Mimeo). Google Scholar
  26. Rogers, W. H. (1993). Regression standard errors in clustered samples. Stata Technical Bulletin, 13, 19–23. Reprinted in Stata Technical Bulletin Reprints, 3, 88–94. Google Scholar
  27. Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98, S71–S102. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Serra-Garcia, M. (2010). Moral hazard in credit markets: the incentive effect of collateral (Working Paper). Tilburg University. Google Scholar
  29. Shearer, B. (2004). Piece rates, fixed wages and incentives: evidence from a field experiment. Review of Economic Studies, 71(2), 513–534. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Economic Science Association 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Economics (ECON)Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)KarlsruheGermany
  2. 2.TWI/University of KonstanzKreuzlingenSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations