What you don’t know won’t hurt you: a laboratory analysis of betrayal aversion
Recent research argues “betrayal aversion” leads many people to avoid risk more when a person, rather than nature, determines the outcome of uncertainty. However, past studies indicate that factors unrelated to betrayal aversion, such as loss aversion, could contribute to differences between treatments. Using a novel experiment design to isolate betrayal aversion, one that varies how strategic uncertainty is resolved, we provide rigorous evidence supporting the detrimental impact of betrayal aversion. The impact is substantial: holding fixed the probability of betrayal, the possibility of knowing that one has been betrayed reduces investment by about one-third. We suggest emotion-regulation underlies these results and helps to explain the importance of impersonal, institution-mediated exchange in promoting economic efficiency.
KeywordsBetrayal aversion Risk Trust Emotion regulation
JEL ClassificationC91 D03 D81
- Jackson, R. L. (2000). The sense and sensibility of betrayal: discovering the meaning of treachery through Jane Austen. Humanitas, 13, 72–89. Google Scholar
- Rabin, M. (1993). Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics. American Economic Review, 83, 1281–1302. Google Scholar
- Snijders, C., & Keren, G. (1998). Determinants of trust. In D. V. Budescu, I. Erev, & R. Zwick (Eds.), Games and human behavior: Essays in honor of Amnon Rapoport (pp. 355–385). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum. Google Scholar