A field experiment on the impact of weather shocks and insurance on risky investment

Abstract

We conduct a framed field experiment in rural Ethiopia to test the seminal hypothesis that insurance provision induces farmers to take greater, yet profitable, risks. Farmers participated in a game protocol in which they were asked to make a simple decision: whether or not to purchase fertilizer and if so, how many bags. The return to fertilizer was dependent on a stochastic weather draw made in each round of the game. In later rounds a random selection of farmers made this decision in the presence of a stylized weather-index insurance contract. Insurance was found to have some positive effect on fertilizer purchases. Purchases were also found to depend on the realization of the weather in the previous round. We explore the mechanisms of this relationship and find that it may be the result of both changes in wealth weather brings about, and changes in perceptions of the costs and benefits to fertilizer purchases.

References

  1. Abadie, A., & Imbens, G. W. (2008). On the failure of the bootstrap for matching estimators. Econometrica, 76(6), 1537–1557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Abadie, A., Drukker, D., Herr, J. L., & Imbens, G. W. (2004). Implementing matching estimators for average treatment effects in Stata. Stata Journal, 4(3), 290–311.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Asfaw, A., & Admassie, A. (2004). The role of education on the adoption of chemical fertiliser under different socioeconomic environments in Ethiopia. Agricultural Economics, 30(3), 215–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Barrett, C. B. (1996). On price risk and the inverse farm size-productivity relationship. Journal of Development Economics, 51, 193–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Becker, S. O., & Ichino, A. (2002). Estimation of average treatment effects based on propensity scores. Stata Journal, 2(4), 358–377.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Binswanger, H. P. (1980). Attitudes toward risk, experimental measurement in rural India. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 62(August), 395–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Blundell, R., & Costa-Dias, M. (2002). Alternative approaches to evaluation in empirical microeconomics. Institute for Fiscal Studies, Cenmap Working Paper cwp10/02.

  8. Bone, J., Hey, J., & Suckling, J. (2004). A simple risk-sharing experiment. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 28(1), 23–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Byerlee, D., Spielman, D., Alemu, D., & Gautam, M. (2007). Policies to promote cereal intensification in Ethiopia: a review of evidence and experience. IFPRI Discussion Paper No. 707.

  10. Cai, H., Chen, Y., Fang, H., & Zhou, L.-A. (2009). Microinsurance, trust and economic development: evidence from a randomized natural field experiment.

  11. Camerer, C., & Kunreuther, H. (1989). Experimental markets for insurance. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 2(3), 265–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Carter, M. (2008). Inducing innovation: risk instruments for solving the conundrum of rural finance.

  13. Charness, G., & Genicot, G. (2009). Informal risk sharing in an infinite-horizon experiment. The Economic Journal, 119(537), 796–825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Charness, G., & Levin, D. (2005). When optimal choices feel wrong: A laboratory study of Bayesian updating, complexity, and affect. American Economic Review, 95(4), 1300–1309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cole, S. A., Gine, X., Tobacman, J., Topalova, P. B., Townsend, R. M., & Vickery, J. I. (2009). Barriers to household risk management: evidence from India. Harvard Business School Finance Working Paper No. 09-116.

  16. Cox, J. C., & Harrison, G. E. (2008). Risk aversion in experiments. Bingley: Emerald.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dadi, L., Burton, M., & Ozanne, A. (2004). Duration analysis of technological adoption in Ethiopian agriculture. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 55(3), 613–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Dercon, S., & Christiaensen, L. (2010). Consumption risk, technology adoption and poverty traps: evidence from Ethiopia. Journal of Development Economics. doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2010.08.003.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Eissa, N., & Liebman, J. (1996). Labor supply response to the earned income tax credit. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 605–637.

  20. Fafchamps, M. (1992). Cash crop production, food price volatility and rural market integration in the third world. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 74(1), 90–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Finkelshtain, I., & Chalfant, J. A. (1991). Marketed surplus under risk: do peasants agree with Sandmo? American Journal of Agricultural Economics.

  22. Giné, X., & Yang, D. (2007). Insurance, credit, and technology adoption: field experimental evidence from Malawi. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 4425.

  23. Giné, X., Townsend, R., & Vickery, J. (2008). Patterns of rainfall insurance participation in rural India. World Bank Economic Review, 22(3), 539–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Grether, D. M. (1980). Bayes rule as a phenomenon: the representative heuristic. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 95(3), 537–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Harrison, G. W., & List, J. A. (2004). Field experiments. Journal of Economic Literature, 42(4), 1009–1055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Harrison, G. W., Humphrey, S. J., & Verschoor, A. (2010). Choice under uncertainty: evidence from Ethiopia, India and Uganda*. The Economic Journal, 120(543), 80–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Heckman, J., & Robb, R. (1985). Alternative methods for evaluating the impact of interventions. Longitudinal Analysis of Labour Market Data.

  28. Heckman, J., Ichimura, H., & Todd, P. (1997). Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator. Review of Economic Studies, 605–654.

  29. Hill, R. V. (2009). Using stated preferences and beliefs to identify the impact of risk on poor households. Journal of Development Studies. doi:10.1080/00220380802553065.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Holt, C. A., & Laury, S. K. (2002). Risk aversion and incentive effects. American Economic Review, 92(5), 1644–1655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Holt, C. A., & Laury, S. K. (2005). Risk aversion and incentive effects: new data without order effects. American Economic Review, 95(3), 902–904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Horowitz, J. K., & Lichtenberg, E. (1993). Insurance, moral hazard and chemical use in agriculture. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 926–935.

  33. Imbens, G. W. (2004). Nonparametric estimation of average treatment effects under exogeneity: a review. Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(1), 4–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1972). Subjective probability: a judgment of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology, 3(3), 430–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973). On the psychology of prediction. Psychological Review, 80, 237–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kurosaki, T., & Fafchamps, M. (2002). Insurance market efficiency and crop choices in Pakistan. Journal of Development Economics, 67(2), 419–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Laury, S. K., McInnes, M. M., & Swarthout, T. (2009). Insurance decisions for low-probability losses. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 39(1), 17–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. McCluskey, J. J., & Rausser, G. C. (2001). Estimation of perceived risk and its effect on property values. Land Economics, 77(1), 42–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Munshi, K. (2004). Social learning in a heterogeneous population: technology diffusion in the Indian green revolution. Journal of Development Economics, 73(1), 185–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Rabin, M. (2002). Inference by believers in the law of small numbers*. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(3), 775–816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Rabin, M., & Vayanos, D. (2009). The gambler’s and hot-hand fallacies: theory and applications. Review of Economic Studies. doi:10.1111/j.1467-937X.2009.00582.x.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Ramaswami, B. (1993). Supply response to agricultural insurance: risk reduction and moral hazard effects. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 914–925.

  43. Rapoport, A., & Budescu, D. V. (1997). Randomization in individual choice behavior. Psychological Review, 104(3), 603–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Sandmo, A. (1971). On the theory of the competitive firm under price uncertainty. American Economic Review, 61(1), 65–73.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Seyoum Tafesse, A. (2009). Decomposition of growth in cereal production in Ethiopia. Background Paper Prepared for the DFID funded Study Understanding the Constraints to Continued Rapid Growth in Ethiopia: The Role of Agriculture.

  46. Smith, K., & Johnson, F. R. (1988). How do risk perceptions respond to information? the case of Radon. Review of Economics and Statistics, 70(1), 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Smith, V. H., & Goodwin, B. K. (1996). Crop insurance, moral hazard and agricultural chemical use. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 428–438.

  48. Spielman, D. (2009). Encouraging economic growth in Ethiopia: perspectives on agricultural input markets, agricultural extension and advisory services, and agricultural education and training. Briefing Note Prepared for the DFID funded Study Understanding the Constraints to Continued Rapid Growth in Ethiopia: The Role of Agriculture.

  49. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1971). Belief in the law of small numbers. Psychological Bulletin, 76(2), 105–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgement under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science, 185(2), 1124–1131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Viscusi, W. K. (1985). Are individuals Bayesian decision makers? American Economic Association Papers and Proceedings, 75(2), 381–385.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Wooldridge, J. M. (2002). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Angelino Viceisza.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

(PDF 95.4 kB)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hill, R.V., Viceisza, A. A field experiment on the impact of weather shocks and insurance on risky investment. Exp Econ 15, 341–371 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-011-9303-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Fertilizer purchases
  • Uncertainty
  • Insurance
  • Investment response
  • Field experiment
  • Ethiopia

JEL Classification

  • C93
  • D13
  • D80
  • O13