Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Peer punishment in teams: expressive or instrumental choice?

  • Published:
Experimental Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A key question about human societies is how social norms of cooperation are enforced. Subjects who violate norms are often targeted by their peers for punishment. In an experiment with small teams we examine whether subjects treat punishment itself as a second-order public good. Results do not support this view and rather suggest a hard-wired taste for punishment; subjects are engaged in a cooperative task but ignore the public good characteristics of punishment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, C. M., & Putterman, L. (2006). Do non-strategic sanctions obey the law of demand? The demand for punishment in the voluntary contribution mechanism. Games and Economic Behavior, 54(1), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andreoni, J. (1990). Impure altruism and donations to public goods: a theory of warm-glow giving. Economic Journal, 100, 464–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andreoni, J., Harbaugh, W., & Vesterlund, L. (2003). The carrot or the stick: rewards, punishment and cooperation. The American Economic Review, 93(3), 893–902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergstrom, T., Blume, L., & Varian, H. (1986). On the private provision of public goods. Journal of Public Economics, 29, 25–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casari, M., & Luini, L. (2009). Group cooperation under alternative peer punishment technologies: an experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 71, 273–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casari, M., & Plott, C. R. (2003). Decentralized management of common property resources: experiments with centuries-old institutions. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 51(2), 217–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charness, G., Rigotti, L., & Rustichini, A. (2007). Individual behavior and, group membership. The American Economic Review, 97(4), 1340–1354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Quervain, D. J.-F., Fischbacher, U., Treyer, V., Schellhammer, M., Schnyder, U., Buck, A., & Fehr, E. (2004). The neural basis of altruistic punishment. Science, 305, 1254–1258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falk, A., Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2005). Driving forces behind informal sanctions. Econometrica, 73(6), 2017–2030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, E., & Gächter, S. (2000). Cooperation and punishment in public goods experiments. American Economic Review, 90(4), 980–994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, E., & Gächter, S. (2002). Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature, 415, 137–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischbacher, U. (2007). Z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for readymade economic experiments. Instructions for experimenters. Experimental Economics, 10(2), 171–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guererk, O., Irlenbusch, B., & Rockenbach, B. (2006). The competitive advantage of sanctioning institutions. Science, 312(5770), 108–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J. S. (1863). Utlitarianism. New York: Longmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikiforakis, N., & Normann, H.-T. (2008). A comparative statics analysis of punishment in public goods experiments. Experimental Economics, 11(4), 358–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E., Walker, J., & Gardner, R. (1992). Covenants with and without a sword: self-governance is possible. The American Political Science Review, 86, 404–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutter, M., Haigner, S., & Kocher, M. (2008) Choosing the carrot or the stick? Endogenous institutional choice in social dilemma situations (Working papers 2008-07). Faculty of Economics and Statistics, University of Innsbruck.

  • Varian, H. (1994). Sequential contributions to public goods. Journal of Public Economics, 53, 165–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vyrastekova, J., Funaki, Y., & Takeuchi, A. (2008) Strategic vs non-strategic motivations of sanctioning (Working paper). Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.

  • Xiao, E., & Houser, D. (2005). Emotion expression in human punishment behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(20), 7398–7401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco Casari.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

(DOC 401KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Casari, M., Luini, L. Peer punishment in teams: expressive or instrumental choice?. Exp Econ 15, 241–259 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-011-9292-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-011-9292-6

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation