Measuring altruism in a public goods experiment: a comparison of U.S. and Czech subjects

Abstract

This paper compares contributions to an experimental public good across the United States and Czech Republic, using a design that allows us to distinguish between altruism and decision error. Czech subjects contribute significantly more than American subjects, and further analysis reveals that this result cannot be attributed to the confounding effects of gender or decision error. Instead, preferences for altruism appear to differ across groups: Czechs are more altruistic than Americans and men are more altruistic than women.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Anderson, S. P., Goeree, J. K., & Holt, C. A. (1998). A theoretical analysis of altruism and decision error in public goods games. Journal of Public Economics, 70, 297–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Andreoni, J. (1995). Warm-glow versus cold-prickle: the effects of positive and negative framing on cooperation in experiments. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, CX(1), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brandts, J., Saijo, T., & Schram, A. (2004). How universal is behavior? A four country comparison of spite and cooperation in voluntary contribution mechanisms. Public Choice, 119, 381–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brown-Kruse, J., & Hummels, D. (1993). Gender effects in laboratory public goods: do individuals put their money where their mouth is? Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 22(3), 255–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Burlando, R., & Hey, J. D. (1997). Do Anglo-Saxons free-ride more? Journal of Public Economics, 64, 41–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cadsby, C. B., & Maynes, E. (1998). Gender and free riding in a threshold public goods game: experimental evidence. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 34, 603–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cadsby, B., Hamaguchi, Y., Kawagoe, T., Maynes, E., & Song, F. (2007). Cross-national gender differences in behavior in a threshold public goods game: Japan versus Canada. Journal of Economic Psychology, 28(2), 242–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cason, T. N., Saijo, T., & Yamato, T. (2002). Voluntary participation and spite in public good provision experiments: an international comparison. Experimental Economics, 5, 133–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dawes, R. M., McTavish, J., & Shaklee, H. (1977). Behavior, communication, and assumptions about other people’s behavior in a commons dilemma situation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35(1), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Goeree, J. K., Holt, C. A., & Laury, S. K. (2002). Private costs and public benefits: unraveling the effects of altruism and noisy behavior. Journal of Public Economics, 83, 255–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Goeree, J. K., Holt, C. A., & Smith, A. M. (2005). An experimental examination of the volunteer’s dilemma. Working Paper.

  12. Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C., Fehr, E., Gintis, H., & McElreath, R. (2001). In search of homo economicus: behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies. The American Economic Review, 91(2), 73–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Herrmann, B., Thöni, C., & Gächter, S. (2008). Antisocial punishment across societies. Science, 319, 1362–1367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations (2nd edn.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hofstede, G., & Hofstede, G. J. (2005). Cultures and organizations: software of the mind. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ledyard, J. O. (1995). Public goods: a survey of experimental research. In J. H. Kagel & A. E. Roth (Eds.), The handbook of experimental economics (pp. 111–194). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nowell, C., & Tinker, S. (1994). The influence of gender on the provision of a public good. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 25, 25–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ockenfels, A., & Weimann, J. (1999). Types and patterns: an experimental East-West-German comparison of cooperation and solidarity. Journal of Public Economics, 71, 275–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Poppe, M., & Utens, L. (1986). Effects of greed and fear of being gypped in a social dilemma situation with changing pool size. Journal of Economic Psychology, 7, 61–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Roth, A. E., Prasnikar, V., Okuno-Fujiwara, M., & Zamir, S. (1991). Bargaining and market behavior in Jerusalem, Ljubljana, Pittsburgh, and Tokyo: an experimental study. The American Economic Review, 81(5), 1068–1095.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Seguino, S., Stevens, T., & Lutz, M. (1996). Gender and cooperative behavior: economic man rides alone. Feminist Economics, 2(1), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sell, J. (1997). Gender, strategies, and contributions to public goods. Social Psychology Quarterly, 60(3), 252–2650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Solow, J. L., & Kirkwood, N. (2002). Group identity and gender in public goods experiments. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 48, 403–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. World Bank (2008). 2005 International comparison program: tables of final results. Washington: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lisa R. Anderson.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

(DOCX 14.4 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Anderson, L.R., DiTraglia, F.J. & Gerlach, J.R. Measuring altruism in a public goods experiment: a comparison of U.S. and Czech subjects. Exp Econ 14, 426–437 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-011-9274-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • Public goods
  • Experiment
  • Czech Republic
  • Nationality
  • Gender

JEL Classification

  • C92
  • H41