Bubble measures in experimental asset markets

Abstract

We review bubble measures which are commonly used in the experimental asset market literature. It seems sensible to require that measures of mispricing should (i) relate the fundamental value and price, (ii) be monotone in the difference between fundamental value and price, and (iii) be independent of the total number of periods and the absolute level of fundamental value. We show that none of the measures currently used fulfills all these criteria. To facilitate comparability across different experimental settings with different parameterizations we propose two alternative measures which fulfill all evaluation criteria. The measure for mispricing, RAD (relative absolute deviation), is calculated by averaging absolute differences between the (volume-weighted) mean price and the fundamental value across all periods and normalizing it with the absolute value of the average FV of the market. The measure for overvaluation, RD (relative deviation), is calculated analogously, but uses raw difference between (volume-weighted) mean prices and fundamental values. Hence, it provides information on whether the mispricing stems from over- or undervaluation of the asset.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Abreu, D., & Brunnermeier, M. K. (2003). Bubbles and crashes. Econometrica, 71(1), 173–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Blanchard, O. J., & Watson, M. W. (1982). Bubbles, rational expectations and financial markets. In H. M., Wachtel (Ed.) Crisis in the economic and financial structure (pp. 295–315). Lexington: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brunnermeier, M. K. (2008). The new Palgrave dictionary of economics, Chap. Bubbles.

  4. Camerer, C., & Weigelt, K. (1991). Information mirages in experimental asset markets. The Journal of Business, 64, 463–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dufwenberg, M., Lindqvist, T., & Moore, E. (2005). Bubbles and experience: an experiment. American Economic Review, 95(5), 1731–1737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Guenster, N., Kole, E., & Jacobsen, B. (2008). Riding bubbles. Electronic copy available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=1071670.

  7. Haessel, W. (1978). Measuring goodness of fit in linear and nonlinear models. Southern Economic Journal, 44(3), 648–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Haruvy, E., & Noussair, C. N. (2006). The effect of short selling on bubbles and crashes in experimental spot asset markets. The Journal of Finance, 61(3), 1119–1157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Haruvy, E., Lahav, Y., & Noussair, C. (2007). Traders’ expectations in asset markets: experimental evidence. American Economic Review, 97(5), 1901–1920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Huber, J., Kirchler, M., & Stöckl, T. (2009). Trading regulations and market efficiency—experimental evidence from two different market models. Working paper.

  11. Hussam, R. N., Porter, D., & Smith, V. L. (2008). Thar she blows: can bubbles be rekindled with experienced subjects? American Economic Review, 98(3), 924–937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kindleberger, C. P. (2000). Manias, panics, and crashes, a history of financial crises (4th edn). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  13. King, R., Smith, V., Williams, A., & Van Boening, M. (1993). The robustness of bubbles and crashes in experimental stock markets. In R. Day & P. Chen (Eds.), Nonlinear dynamics and evolutionary economics (pp. 183–200). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kirchler, M. (2009). Underreaction to fundamental information and asymmetry in mispricing between bullish and bearish markets. An experimental study. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 33, 491–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kirchler, M., Huber, J., & Stöckl, T. (2009). Bubble or no bubble—the impact of market model on the formation of price bubbles in experimental asset markets. Working Paper available at: http://econpapers.repec.org/paper/innwpaper/2009-26.htm.

  16. Lei, V., & Vesely, F. (2009). Market efficiency: evidence from a no-bubble asset market experiment. Pacific Economic Review, 14(2), 246–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lei, V., Noussair, C. N., & Plott, C. R. (2002). Asset bubbles and rationality: additional evidence from capital gains tax experiments. Working paper.

  18. Noussair, C. N., & Powell, O. (2008). Peaks and valleys: experimental asset markets with non-monotonic fundamentals. Working paper.

  19. Noussair, C. N., & Tucker, S. (2006). Futures markets and bubble formation in experimental asset markets. Pacific Economic Review, 11(2), 167–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Noussair, C. N., Robin, S., & Ruffieux, B. (2001). Price bubbles in laboratory asset markets with constant fundamental values. Experimental Economics, 4, 87–105.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Oechssler, J., Schmidt, C., & Schnedler, W. (2007). On the ingredients for buble formation: informed traders and communication. Working paper.

  22. Porter, D. P., & Smith, V. L. (1995). Futures contracting and dividend uncertainty in experimental asset markets. The Journal of Business, 68(4), 509–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Shiller, R. J. (2000). Irrational exuberance. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Siegel, J. J. (2003). What is an asset price bubble? An operational definition. European Financial Management, 9(1), 11–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Smith, V. L., Suchanek, G. L., & Williams, A. W. (1988). Bubbles, crashes, and endogenous expectations in experimental spot asset markets. Econometrica, 56(5), 1119–1151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sutter, M., Huber, J., & Kirchler, M. (2009). Bubbles and information: an experiment. Working paper.

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Stöckl.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stöckl, T., Huber, J. & Kirchler, M. Bubble measures in experimental asset markets. Exp Econ 13, 284–298 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-010-9241-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • Experimental economics
  • Asset market
  • Bubble
  • Bubble measure

JEL Classification

  • C90
  • D84
  • G14