Abstract
Which inequalities among individuals are considered unjust? This paper reports the results of an experiment designed to study distributive choices dealing with arbitrarily unequal initial endowments. In a three-person distribution problem where subjects either know or do not know their endowments, we find impartial behavior to be a stable pattern. Subjects either compensate for initial inequalities fully or not at all in both conditions, and they do so more often when they do not know their endowment than when they know it. Moreover, the type and the size of the good to be distributed also affect the frequency of impartial behavior.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Beckman, S. R., Formby, J. P., Smith, W. J., & Zheng, B. (2002). Envy, Malice and Pareto efficiency: An experimental examination. Social Choice and Welfare, 19, 349–367.
Berg, J. E., Daley, L. A., Dickhaut, J. W., & O’Brien, J. R. (1986). Controlling risk preferences for lotteries on units of experimental exchange. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 101(2), 281–306.
Bolton, G. E., & Ockenfels, A. (2000). ERC: A theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition. American Economic Review, 90(1), 166–193.
Bolton, G. E., Brandts, J., & Ockenfels, A. (2005). Fair procedures: evidence from games involving lotteries. The Economic Journal, 115(506), 1054–1076.
Camerer, C. (2003). Behavioral game theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Cappelen, A. W., Hole, A. D., Sorensen, E. O., & Tungodden, B. (2007). The pluralism of fairness ideals: an experimental approach. American Economic Review, 97(3), 818–827.
Cherry, T. L., Frykblom, P., & Shogren, J. F. (2002). Hardnose the dictator. American Economic Review, 92(4), 1218–1221.
Cox, J. C., Roberson, B., & Smith, V. L. (1982). Theory and behavior of single unit auctions. In V. L. Smith (Ed.). Research in experimental economics (Vol. 2 pp. 1–43). Greenwich: JAI.
Dohmen, T., Falk, A., Huffman, D., Sunde, U., Schupp, J., & Wagner, G. G. (forthcoming). Individual risk attitudes: New evidence from a large, representative, experimentally-validated survey. Journal of the European Economic Association.
Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (1999). A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(3), 817–868.
Fischbacher, U. (2007). Zurich toolbox for readymade economic experiments. Experimental Economics, 10(2), 171–178.
Fischbacher, U., & Gächter, S. (forthcoming). Social preferences beliefs, and the dynamics of free riding in public good experiments. American Economics Review.
Fischbacher, U., Gächter, S., & Fehr, E. (2001). Are people conditionally cooperative? Evidence from a public goods experiment. Economics Letters, 71, 397–404.
Frohlich, N., & Oppenheimer, J. A. (1992). Choosing justice. An experimental approach to ethical theory. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Frohlich, N., Oppenheimer, J. A., & Kurki, A. (2004). Modeling other-regarding preferences and an experimental test. Public Choice, 119, 91–117.
Gauthier, D. (1986). Morals by agreement. Oxford: Clarendon.
Greiner, B. (2004). An online recruitment system for economic experiments. In K. Kremer & V. Macho. Forschung und wissenschaftliches Rechnen (pp. 79–93). GWDG Bericht 63. Ges. für Wiss. Datenverarbeitung, Göttingen.
Harsanyi, J. (1975). Can the maximin principle serve as a basis for morality? American Political Science Review, 69, 599–606.
Karni, E., Salmon, T., & Sopher, B. (2008). Individual sense of fairness: an experimental study. Experimental Economics, 11(2), 174–189.
Konow, J. (2000). Fair shares and cognitive dissonance in allocation decisions. American Economic Review, 90(4), 1072–1091.
Konow, J. (2003). Which is the fairest one of all? A positive analysis of justice theories. Journal of Economic Literature, 41(4), 1188–1239.
Krawczyk, M. (2007). A glimpse through the veil of ignorance: equality of opportunity and support for redistribution. Mimeo.
Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Rutström, E. E., & Williams, M. B. (2000). Entitlements and fairness: an experimental study of distributive preferences. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 43(1), 75–89.
Roth, A. E., & Malouf, M. W. K. (1979). Game-theoretic models and the role of information in bargaining. Psychological Review, 86, 574–594.
Young, H. P. (1994). Equity in theory and practice. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic Supplementary Material
Rights and permissions
Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Becker, A., Miller, L.M. Promoting justice by treating people unequally: an experimental study. Exp Econ 12, 437–449 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-009-9222-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-009-9222-z