Skip to main content
Log in

The impact of downward social information on contribution decisions

  • Published:
Experimental Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we study the effect of downward social information in contribution decisions to fund public goods. We describe the results of a field experiment run in conjunction with the fundraising campaigns of a public radio station. Renewing members are presented with social information (information about another donor’s contribution) which is either above or below their previous (last year’s) contribution. We find that respondents change their contribution in the direction of the social information; increasing their contribution when the social information is above their previous contribution, and decreasing their contribution when the social information is below. We hypothesize about the psychological motivations that may cause the results and test these hypotheses by comparing the relative size of the upward and downward shifts. These results improve our understanding of cooperation in public good provision and suggest differential costs and benefits to fundraisers in providing social information.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andreoni, J. (1989). Giving with impure altruism: applications to charity and Ricardian equivalence. Journal of Political Economy, 97, 1447–1458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andreoni, J. (1990). Impure altruism and donations to public goods: a theory of warm-glow giving. Economic Journal, 100, 464–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andreoni, J. (2004). Philanthropy. In L.-A. Gerard-Varet, S.-C. Kolm, & J. M. Ythier (Eds.), Handbooks in economics : Vol. 18. The handbook of giving, reciprocity and altruism (pp. 1201–1269). Amsterdam: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. (1974). A theory of social interactions. Journal of Political Economy, 82, 1063–1093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryan, J., & Test, M. (1967). Models and helping: naturalistic studies in aiding behavior. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 6, 400–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croson, R., Handy, F., & Shang, J. (2006). The relationship between norms, social information and subsequent giving: results from a donor survey and a lab experiment (Working paper). University of Texas at Dallas.

  • Davis, D., & Holt, C. (1993). Experimental economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawes, R. (1980). Social dilemmas. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 169–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckel, C., & Grossman, P. (2005). Subsidizing charitable contributions: a field test comparing matching and rebate subsidies (Working paper). Virginia Polytechnic Institute and Station University.

  • Falk, A. (2005). Charitable giving as a gift exchange: evidence from a field experiment (Working paper). University of Bonn.

  • Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischbacher, U., Gaechter, S., & Fehr, E. (2001). Are people conditionally cooperative? Evidence from a public goods experiment. Economics Letters, 71, 397–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B., & Meier, S. (2004). Social comparisons and pro-social behavior: testing ‘conditional cooperation’ in a field experiment. American Economic Review, 94, 1717–1722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giving USA. (2006). American Association of Fundraising Counsel, Glenview, IL.

  • LaTour, S. A., & Manrai, A. K. (1989). Interactive impact of informational and normative influence on donations. Journal of Marketing Research, 26(3), 327–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ledyard, J. (1995). Public goods: a survey of experimental research. In J. Kagel & A. E. Roth, (Eds.), Handbook of experimental economics (Vol. 2, pp. 111–194). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • List, J. (2007). On the interpretation of giving in dictator games. Journal of Political Economy, 115, 482–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • List, J., & Lucking-Reiley, D. (2002). The effects of seed money and refunds on charitable giving: experimental evidence from a university capital campaign. Journal of Political Economy, 110, 215–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, S., & List, J. (2007). What do laboratory experiments measuring social preferences reveal about the real world? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21, 153–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reingen, P. H. (1978). On inducing compliance with requests. Journal of Consumer Research, 5, 96–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salamon, L. M., Sokolowski, S. W., & List, R. (2004). Global Civil society: an overview. In L. M. Salamon & S. W. Sokolowski (Eds.), Global Civil society: dimensions of the nonprofit sector (Vol. 2, pp. 33–90). Bloomfield: Kumarian Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shang, J., & Croson, R. (2006). The impact of social comparisons on nonprofit fundraising. Research in Experimental Economics, 11, 143–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shang, J., & Croson, R. (2007). Field experiments in charitable contribution: the impact of social influence on the voluntary provision of public goods (Working paper). University of Texas at Dallas.

  • Shang, J., Reed, A., & Croson, R. (2008, forthcoming). Identity-based gender congruency effect on donations. Journal of Marketing Research.

  • Sargeant, A. (1999). Charitable giving; towards a model of giving behavior. Journal of Marketing Management, 15, 212–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sugden, R. (1984). Reciprocity: the supply of public goods through voluntary contributions. Economic Journal, 94, 772–787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weyant, J. (1996). Application of compliance techniques to direct-mail request for charitable donation. Psychology and Marketing, 13, 157–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rachel Croson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Croson, R., Shang, J.(. The impact of downward social information on contribution decisions. Exper Econ 11, 221–233 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-007-9191-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-007-9191-z

Keywords

JEL

Navigation