Experimental Economics

, Volume 11, Issue 3, pp 221–233 | Cite as

The impact of downward social information on contribution decisions

  • Rachel CrosonEmail author
  • Jen (Yue) Shang


In this paper we study the effect of downward social information in contribution decisions to fund public goods. We describe the results of a field experiment run in conjunction with the fundraising campaigns of a public radio station. Renewing members are presented with social information (information about another donor’s contribution) which is either above or below their previous (last year’s) contribution. We find that respondents change their contribution in the direction of the social information; increasing their contribution when the social information is above their previous contribution, and decreasing their contribution when the social information is below. We hypothesize about the psychological motivations that may cause the results and test these hypotheses by comparing the relative size of the upward and downward shifts. These results improve our understanding of cooperation in public good provision and suggest differential costs and benefits to fundraisers in providing social information.


Social influence Social information Social comparison Charitable giving Public goods 


C72 C93 H41 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Andreoni, J. (1989). Giving with impure altruism: applications to charity and Ricardian equivalence. Journal of Political Economy, 97, 1447–1458. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andreoni, J. (1990). Impure altruism and donations to public goods: a theory of warm-glow giving. Economic Journal, 100, 464–477. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andreoni, J. (2004). Philanthropy. In L.-A. Gerard-Varet, S.-C. Kolm, & J. M. Ythier (Eds.), Handbooks in economics : Vol. 18. The handbook of giving, reciprocity and altruism (pp. 1201–1269). Amsterdam: North Holland. Google Scholar
  4. Becker, G. (1974). A theory of social interactions. Journal of Political Economy, 82, 1063–1093. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bryan, J., & Test, M. (1967). Models and helping: naturalistic studies in aiding behavior. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 6, 400–407. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Croson, R., Handy, F., & Shang, J. (2006). The relationship between norms, social information and subsequent giving: results from a donor survey and a lab experiment (Working paper). University of Texas at Dallas. Google Scholar
  7. Davis, D., & Holt, C. (1993). Experimental economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
  8. Dawes, R. (1980). Social dilemmas. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 169–193. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eckel, C., & Grossman, P. (2005). Subsidizing charitable contributions: a field test comparing matching and rebate subsidies (Working paper). Virginia Polytechnic Institute and Station University. Google Scholar
  10. Falk, A. (2005). Charitable giving as a gift exchange: evidence from a field experiment (Working paper). University of Bonn. Google Scholar
  11. Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117–140. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fischbacher, U., Gaechter, S., & Fehr, E. (2001). Are people conditionally cooperative? Evidence from a public goods experiment. Economics Letters, 71, 397–404. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Frey, B., & Meier, S. (2004). Social comparisons and pro-social behavior: testing ‘conditional cooperation’ in a field experiment. American Economic Review, 94, 1717–1722. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Giving USA. (2006). American Association of Fundraising Counsel, Glenview, IL. Google Scholar
  15. LaTour, S. A., & Manrai, A. K. (1989). Interactive impact of informational and normative influence on donations. Journal of Marketing Research, 26(3), 327–335. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ledyard, J. (1995). Public goods: a survey of experimental research. In J. Kagel & A. E. Roth, (Eds.), Handbook of experimental economics (Vol. 2, pp. 111–194). Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
  17. List, J. (2007). On the interpretation of giving in dictator games. Journal of Political Economy, 115, 482–493. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. List, J., & Lucking-Reiley, D. (2002). The effects of seed money and refunds on charitable giving: experimental evidence from a university capital campaign. Journal of Political Economy, 110, 215–233. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Levitt, S., & List, J. (2007). What do laboratory experiments measuring social preferences reveal about the real world? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21, 153–174. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Reingen, P. H. (1978). On inducing compliance with requests. Journal of Consumer Research, 5, 96–102. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Salamon, L. M., Sokolowski, S. W., & List, R. (2004). Global Civil society: an overview. In L. M. Salamon & S. W. Sokolowski (Eds.), Global Civil society: dimensions of the nonprofit sector (Vol. 2, pp. 33–90). Bloomfield: Kumarian Press. Google Scholar
  22. Shang, J., & Croson, R. (2006). The impact of social comparisons on nonprofit fundraising. Research in Experimental Economics, 11, 143–156. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Shang, J., & Croson, R. (2007). Field experiments in charitable contribution: the impact of social influence on the voluntary provision of public goods (Working paper). University of Texas at Dallas. Google Scholar
  24. Shang, J., Reed, A., & Croson, R. (2008, forthcoming). Identity-based gender congruency effect on donations. Journal of Marketing Research. Google Scholar
  25. Sargeant, A. (1999). Charitable giving; towards a model of giving behavior. Journal of Marketing Management, 15, 212–238. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sugden, R. (1984). Reciprocity: the supply of public goods through voluntary contributions. Economic Journal, 94, 772–787. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Weyant, J. (1996). Application of compliance techniques to direct-mail request for charitable donation. Psychology and Marketing, 13, 157–170. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Economic Science Association 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.EPPS and SOMUniversity of Texas at DallasRichardsonUSA
  2. 2.Center on PhilanthropyIndiana UniversityIndianapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations