Abstract
Experimental dictator games have been used to explore unselfish behaviour. Evidence is presented here, however, that subjects’ generosity can be reversed by allowing them to take a partner’s money. Dictator game giving therefore does not reveal concern for consequences to others existing independently of the environment, as posited in rational choice theory. It may instead be an artefact of experimentation. Alternatively, evaluations of options depend on the composition of the choice set. Implications of these possibilities are explored for experimental methodology and charitable donations respectively. The data favour the artefact interpretation, suggesting that demand characteristics of experimental protocols merit investigation, and that economic analysis should not exclude context-specific social norms.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adair, G. (1984). The Hawthorne effect: A reconsideration of the methodological artefact. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 334–345.
Agresti, A. (1992). A survey of exact inference for contingency tables. Statistical Science, 7, 131–177.
Andreoni, J., & Miller, J. (2002). Giving according to GARP: an experimental test of the consistency of preferences for altruism. Econometrica, 70, 737–753.
Bardsley, N. (2005). Experimental economics and the artificiality of alteration. Journal of Economic Methodology, 12, 239–251.
Bergstrom, T., Blume, L., & Varian, H. (1986). On the private provision of public goods. Journal of Public Economics, 29, 25–49.
Bohnet, I., & Frey, B. (1999). Social distance and other-regarding behavior in dictator games: comment. American Economic Review, 89, 335–339.
Bolton, G., & Ockenfels, A. (1998). Strategy and equity: an ERC-analysis of the Güth-van Damme game. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 62, 215–226.
Brandts, J., & Solà, C. (2001). Reference points and negative reciprocity in simple sequential games. Games and Economic Behavior, 36, 138–157.
Camerer, C. F. (2003). Behavioral game theory: experiments in strategic interaction. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Charness, G., & Rabin, M. (2002). Understanding social preferences with simple tests. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117, 817–869.
Cherry, T. L., Frykblom, P., & Shogren, J. F. (2002). Hardnose the dictator. American Economic Review, 92, 1218–1221.
Cox, J., Sadiraj, K., & Sadiraj, V. (2002). Trust, fear, reciprocity and altruism (Working Paper). University of Arizona.
Dana, J., Weber, R. A., & Xi Kuang, J. (2005). Exploiting moral wiggle room: experiments demonstrating an illusory preference for fairness (Discussion Paper). University of Carnegie Mellon. Economic Theory, forthcoming.
Davies, J. B., & Best, D. W. (1996). Demand characteristics and research into drug use. Psychological Health, 11, 291–299.
Dilman, I. (1996). Science and psychology. In A. O’Hear (Ed.), Verstehen and human understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Douglas, M., & Isherwood, B. (1979). The world of goods: towards an anthropology of consumption. London: Allen Lane.
Eckel, C., & Grossman, P. J. (1996). Altruism in anonymous dictator games. Games and Economic Behavior, 16, 181–191.
Efron, B. (1979). Bootstrap methods: another look at the jacknife. Annals of Statistics, 7, 1–26.
Faith, M. S., Wong, J. Y., & Allison, D. B. (1998). Demand characteristics of the research setting can influence indexes of negative affect-induced eating in obese individuals. Obesity Research, 6, 134–136.
Falk, A., Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2003). On the nature of fair behavior. Economic Inquiry, 41, 20–26.
Fechner, G. (1966 [1860]). Elements of psychophysics (Vol. 1). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (1999). A theory of fairness, competition and cooperation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 817–868.
Fernandez, E., & Turk, D. C. (1994). Demand characteristics underlying differential ratings of sensory versus affective components of pain. Journal of Behavioural Medicine, 17, 375–390.
Greenwood, J. D. (1982). On the relation between laboratory experiments and social behaviour: causal explanation and generalisation. Journal of the Theory of Social Behaviour, 12, 225–249.
Haley, K. J., & Fessler, D. M. T. (2005). Nobody’s watching? Subtle cues affect generosity in an anonymous economic game. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 245–256.
Harré, R., & Secord, P. (1972). The explanation of social behaviour. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Hoffman, E., McCabe, K., & Smith, V. L. (1996). Social distance and other-regarding behavior in dictator games. American Economic Review, 86, 653–660.
Jones, S. R. G. (1992). Was there a Hawthorne effect? American Journal of Sociology, 98, 451–468.
Lampinen, J. M., Neuschatz, J. S., & Payne, D. G. (1999). Source attributions and false memories: a test of the demand characteristics account. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 6, 130–135.
List, J. A. (2007, forthcoming). On the interpretation of giving in dictator games. Journal of Political Economy.
Loomes, G., & Sugden, R. (1995). Incorporating a stochastic element into decision theories. European Economic Review, 39, 641–648.
Loomes, G., & Sugden, R. (1998). Testing different stochastic specifications of risky choice. Economica, 65, 581–598.
MacLeod, C. M. (1999). The item and list methods of directed forgetting: test differences and the role of demand characteristics. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 6, 123–129.
McKelvey, R. D., & Palfrey, T. R. (1995). Quantal response equilibria for normal form games. Games and Economic Behavior, 10, 6–38.
Orne, M. T. (1962). On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: with particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications. American Psychologist, 17, 776–783.
Orne, M. T. (1973). Communication by the total experimental situation. In P. Pliner, L. Krames, & T. Alloway (Eds.), Communication and affect (2nd ed., pp. 157–191). New York: Academic Press.
Parducci, A., & Wedell, D. (1986). The category effect with rating scales: number of categories, number of stimuli, and method of presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12, 496–516.
Rabin, M. (1993). Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics. American Economic Review, 83, 1281–1302.
Roethlisberger, F. J., & Dickson, W. J. (1939). Management and the worker. New York: Wiley.
Thaler, R. H. (1999). Mental accounting matters. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 12, 183–206.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic Supplementary Material
Electronic Supplementary Material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bardsley, N. Dictator game giving: altruism or artefact?. Exp Econ 11, 122–133 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-007-9172-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-007-9172-2