Skip to main content
Log in

An experimental examination of the house money effect in a multi-period setting

  • Published:
Experimental Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is evidence that risk-taking behavior is influenced by prior monetary gains and losses. When endowed with house money, people become more risk taking. This paper is the first to report a house money effect in a dynamic, financial setting. Using an experimental method, we compare market outcomes across sessions that differ in the level of cash endowment (low and high). Our experimental results provide support for a house money effect. Traders’ bids, price predictions, and market prices are influenced by the amount of money that is provided prior to trading. However, dynamic behavior is difficult to interpret due to conflicting influences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barberis, N., & Huang, M. (2001). Mental accounting, loss aversion, and individual stock returns. Journal of Finance, 56(4), 1247–1292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barberis, N., Huang, M., & Santos, T. (2001). Prospect theory and asset prices. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1), 1–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barberis, N., Huang, M., & Thaler, R. (2002). Individual preferences, monetary gambles and the equity premium, working paper, University of Chicago and Stanford University.

  • Battalio, R. C., Kagel, J. H., & Jiranyakul, K. (1990). Testing between alternative models of choice under uncertainty: some initial results. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 3(1), 25–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bekaert, G., Hodrick, R. J., & Marshall, D. A. (1997). The implications of first-order risk aversion for asset market risk premiums. Journal of Monetary Economics, 40(1), 3–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benartzi, S., & Thaler, R. (1995). Myopic loss aversion and the equity premium puzzle. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(1), 73–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J. (2002). House money effects in public goods experiments. Experimental Economics, 5, 223–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, D. D., & Holt, C. A. (1993). Experimental economics. Princeton, New Jersey, Princeton University Press.

  • Edwards, K. D. (1996). Prospect theory: A literature review. International Review of Financial Analysis, 5(1), 19–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gertner, R. (1993). Game shows and economic behavior: Risk-taking on “card sharks. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(2), 507–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirshleifer, D. (2001). Investor psychology and asset pricing. Journal of Finance, 56(4), 1533–1597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isen, A. M., & Patrick, R. E. (1983). The effect of positive feelings on risk-taking: When the Chips are Down. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Performance, 31, 194–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isen, A. M., & Geva N. (1987). The influence of positive affect on acceptable level of risk: The person with the large canoe has a large worry. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39, 145–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision-making under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knetsch, J. L., & Sinden, J. A. (1987). The persistence of evaluation disparities. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 102(3), 691–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knetsch, J. L., Tang, F.-F., & Thaler, R. H. (2001). The endowment effect and repeated market trials: Is the Vickrey Auction Demand Revealing? Experimental Economics, 4(3), 257–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levy, H., & Levy, M. (2002). Experimental test of the prospect theory value function: A stochastic dominance approach. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89, 1058–1081.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myagkov, M., & Plott, C. R. (1997). Exchange economies and loss exposure: Experiments exploring prospect theory and competitive equilibria in market environments. American Economic Review, 87(5), 801–828.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabin, M., & Thaler, R. H. (2001). Anomalies: Risk aversion.” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(1), 219–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, V. (1994). Economics in the laboratory. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(1), 113–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thaler, R., & Johnston, E. J. (1990). Gambling with the house money and trying to break even: The effects of prior outcomes on risky choice. Management Science, 36, 643–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4), 297–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vickrey, W. (1961). Conterspecualtion, auctions, and competitive sealed tenders. Journal of Finance, 16, 8–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wakker, P. P. (2003). The data of levy and levy (2002). ‘prospect theory: Much ado about nothing?’ Actually support prospect theory. Management Science, 49(7), 979–981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lucy F. Ackert.

Additional information

JEL Classification C91 · C92 · D80

The views expressed here are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta or the Federal Reserve System.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ackert, L.F., Charupat, N., Church, B.K. et al. An experimental examination of the house money effect in a multi-period setting. Exp Econ 9, 5–16 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-006-1467-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-006-1467-1

Keywords

Navigation