Skip to main content
Log in

Learning Direction Theory and the Winner’s Curse

  • Published:
Experimental Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We report an experiment on a decision task by Samuelson and Bazerman (1985). Subjects submit a bid for an item with an unknown value. A winner’s curse phenomenon arises when subjects bid too high and make losses. Learning direction theory can account for this. However, other influences on behaviour can also be identified. We introduce impulse balance theory to make quantitative predictions on the basis of learning direction theory. We also look at monotonic ladder processes. It is shown that for this kind of Markov chains the impulse balance point is connected to the mode of the stationary distribution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Abbink, K. and Sadrieh, A. (1995). “RatImage–-Research Assistance Toolbox for Computer-Aided Human Behavior Experiments.” SFB Discussion Paper B-325, University of Bonn.

  • Akerlof, G.A. (1970). “The Market for ‘Lemons’: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism.” Quarterly Journal of Economics. 84(3), 488–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S.B., Bazerman, H., and Carroll, J.S. (1991). “An Evaluation of Learning in the Bilateral Winner’s Curse.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 48, 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benartzi, S. and Thaler, R.H. (1995). “Myopic Loss Aversion and the Equity Premium Puzzle.” Quarterly Journal of Economics. 110(1), 73–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berninghaus, S. and Ehrhart, K.-M. (1998). “Time Horizon and Equilibrium Selection in Tacit Coordination Games: Experimental Results.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. 37(2), 231–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bush, R.R. and Mosteller, R. (1955). Stochastic Models of Learning. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camerer, C. and Ho, T.H. (1999). “Experience-Weighted Attraction Learning in Normal Form Games.” Econometrica. 67(4), 827–874.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capen, E.C., Clapp, R.V., and Campbell, W.M. (1971). “Competitive Bidding in High-Risk Situations.” Journal of Petroleum Technology. 23, 641–653.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cason, T. and Friedman, D. (1997). “Price Formation in Single Call Markets.” Econometrica. 65(2), 311–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosskopf, B., Erev, I., and Yechiam, E. (2000). “Foregone with the Wind.” Mimeo, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.

  • Kagel, J.H. (1995). “Auctions.” In J.H. Kagel and A.E. Roth (eds.), The Handbook of Experimental Economics. Princeton University Press.

  • Kagel, J.H. and Levin, D. (1999). “Common Value Auctions with Insider Information.” Econometrica. 67(5), 1219–1238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (1979). “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk.” Econometrica. 47(2). 263–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuon, B. (1993). “Two-Person Bargaining with Incomplete Information.” Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol. 412. Springer-Verlag Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitzkewitz, M. and Nagel, R. (1993). “Envy, Greed, and Anticipation in Ultimatum Games with Incomplete Information.” International Journal of Game Theory., 22, 171–198.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, R. (1995). “Unraveling in Guessing Games: An Experimental Study.” American Economic Review. 85(5), 1313–1326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, A. and Erev, I. (1995). “Learning in Extensive-Form Games: Experimental Data and Simple Dynamic Models in the Intermediate Term.” Games and Economic Behavior. 8, 164–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryll, W. (1996). “Litigation and Settlement in a Game with Incomplete Information.” Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems vol. 440. Springer-Verlag Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadrieh, A. (1998). “The Alternating Double Auction Market: A Game Theoretic and Experimental Investigation.” Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol. 466. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, W.F. and Bazerman, M.H. (1985). “The Winner’s Curse in Bilateral Negotiations.” In V.L. Smith (ed.), Research in Experimental Economics. Greenwich: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholz, R.W. (1987). Cognitive Strategies in Stochastic Thinking. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selten, R. and Buchta, J. (1999). “Experimental Sealed-Bid First Price Auctions with Directly Observed Bid Functions.” In D. Budescu, I. Erev, and R. Zwick (eds.), Games and Human Behavior: Essays in the Honor of Amnon Rapoport. NJ: Lawrenz Associates Mahwah.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selten, R. and Stoecker, R. (1986). “End Behavior in Sequences of Finite Prisoners’ Dilemma Supergames: A Learning Theory Approach.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 7, 47–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Reinhard Selten.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Selten, R., Abbink, K. & Cox, R. Learning Direction Theory and the Winner’s Curse. Exp Econ 8, 5–20 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-005-1407-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-005-1407-5

Keywords

Navigation