Skip to main content

Clutch size and the rejection of parasitic eggs: a comparative test of the maternal investment hypothesis

Abstract

Obligate brood parasitic birds lay their eggs in the nests of other species, reducing the host’s own reproductive output. To circumvent these fitness costs, many—but not all—host species have evolved the ability to recognize and reject brood parasitic eggs. What factors constrain egg rejection, and why do host species vary in their likelihood of rejection? Previous comparative studies have found that egg rejection rates covary with several biotic factors (including larger body size, smaller relative brain size, and more northerly breeding latitudes), but much behavioral variation in the occurrence of egg rejection remains unexplained. In this study, we test a corollary of the maternal investment hypothesis, by assessing whether species with higher clutch sizes are more likely to eliminate parasitic eggs. We examined two published data sets comprising over 200 unique bird species, controlling for phylogeny and other known interspecific correlates of egg rejection rates. Contrary to the prediction, we found no evidence for a positive relationship between clutch size and egg rejection rate. Rather, our analyses suggest a weak but consistent negative relationship between absolute and relative metrics of clutch size versus egg rejection rate across species. These results are instead consistent with two previously proposed alternative hypotheses: that egg rejection is constrained by a trade-off between maternal investment and anti-parasitic defenses, possibly mediated by endocrine mechanisms linked to parental care, and/or that cognitive decision rules facilitate the detection of dissimilar eggs in smaller clutches.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

Availability of data and materials

The updated data sets used in this study have been deposited into Figshare.com and are made available publicly at: https://figshare.com/s/e2fa76fa80382edb5d67.

Code availability

Software application or custom code: We did not use custom software or code for this project.

References

  • Abolins-Abols M, Hauber ME (2018) Host defenses against avian brood parasitism: an endocrine perspective. Proc R Soc Lond B 285:20180980

    Google Scholar 

  • Abolins-Abols M, Hauber ME (2020a) Endocrine regulation of egg rejection in an avian brood parasite host. Biol Lett 16:20200225

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abolins-Abols M, Hauber ME (2020b) Proximate predictors of variation in egg rejection behavior by hosts of avian brood parasites. J Comp Psychol 134:412–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akre KL, Johnsen S (2014) Psychophysics and the evolution of behavior. Trends Ecol Evol 29:291–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antonson ND, Rubenstein DR, Hauber ME, Botero CA (2020) Ecological uncertainty favours the diversification of host use in avian brood parasites. Nat Commun 11:4185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ausprey IJ, Hauber ME (2021) Host and brood parasite coevolutionary interactions covary with comparative patterns of the avian visual system. Biol Lett 17:20210309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aviles JM, Garamszegi LZ (2007) Egg rejection and brain size among potential hosts of the common cuckoo. Ethology 113:562–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billerman SM, Keeney BK, Rodewald PG, Schulenberg TS (2020) Birds of the world. Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology, Ithaca

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Briskie JV, Sealy SG, Hobson KA (1992) Behavioral defenses against avian brood parasitism in sympatric and allopatric host populations. Evolution 46:334–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock TH (1991) The evolution of parental care. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cruz A, Prather JW, Wiley JW, Weaver PF (2008) Egg rejection behavior in a population exposed to parasitism: village weavers on Hispaniola. Behav Ecol 19:398–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies NB, Brooke MdL (1989) An experimental study of co-evolution between the cuckoo, Cuculus canorus, and its hosts. I. Host Egg Discrimination J Anim Ecol 58:207–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixit T, Caves EM, Spottiswoode CN, Horrocks NPC (2021) Why and how to apply Weber's Law to coevolution and mimicry. Evolution (online)

  • Fristoe TS, Iwaniuk AN, Botero CA (2017) Big brains stabilize populations and facilitate colonization of variable habitats in birds. Nat Ecol Evol 1:1706–1715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauber ME (2003) Hatching asynchrony, nestling competition, and the cost of interspecific brood parasitism. Behav Ecol 14:224–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauber ME, Moskat C, Ban M (2006) Experimental shift in hosts’ acceptance threshold of inaccurate-mimic brood parasite eggs. Biol Lett 2:177–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauber ME, Abolins-Abols M, Kim CR, Paitz RT (2020) Inter-individual variation in anti-parasitic egg rejection behavior: a test of the maternal investment hypothesis. Integr Org Biol 2:obaa014

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jetz W, Thomas GH, Joy JB, Hartmann K, Mooers AO (2012) The global diversity of birds in space and time. Nature 491:444–448

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilner RM (2006) The evolution of egg colour and patterning in birds. Biol Rev 81:283–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruger O (2007) Cuckoos, cowbirds and hosts: adaptations, trade-offs and constraints. Philos Trans Royal Soc Lond B 362:1873–1886. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2006.1849

  • Liu J, Yang C, Yu J, Wang Moller AP, Liang W (2020) Egg recognition and brain size in a cuckoo host. Behav Process 180:104223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luro A, Hauber ME (2020) Avian diet and foraging ecology constrain foreign egg recognition and rejection. Avian Biol Res 13:24–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manna T, Moskat C, Hauber ME (2017) Ch. 24: Cognitive decision rules for egg rejection. In: Soler M (ed) Avian brood parasitism. Springer Nature, New York, pp 438–448

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazerolle MJ (2017) AICcmodavg: model selection and multimodel inference based on (Q)AIC(c). R package version 2.1–1. https://cran.r-project.org/package=AICcmodavg

  • Medina I, Langmore NE (2015) The costs of avian brood parasitism explain variation in egg rejection behaviour in hosts. Biol Lett 11:20150296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moskat C, Hauber ME, Louder MIM (2017) Ch. 26: The evolution of nest sharing and nestmate killing strategies in brood parasites. In: Soler M (ed) Avian brood parasitism. Springer Nature, New York, pp 475–492

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Peer BD, Sealy SG (2004) Correlates of egg rejection in hosts of the brown-headed cowbird. Condor 106:580–599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, R Development Core Team (2015) nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1-121. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme/

  • Pollock HS, Hoover JP, Uy FMK, Hauber ME (2021) Brood parasites represent a heterogeneous and functionally distinct class of natural enemies. Trends Parasitol (online)

  • R Core Team (2020) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. https://www.R-project.org/

  • Rambaut A, Drummond AJ, Xie D, Baele G, Suchard MA (2018) Posterior summarisation in Bayesian phylogenetics using Tracer 1.7. Syst Biol 67:901–904

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rambaut A, Drummond AJ (2016) TreeAnnotator v1.8.3. University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh. http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk/treeannotator/

  • Rothstein SI (1982) Mechanisms of avian egg rejection: which egg parameters elicit responses to rejecter species? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 11:229–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein SI (1990) A model System for coevolution: avian brood parasitism. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 21:481–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Raya F (2021) Ecophysiology of egg rejection in hosts of avian brood parasites: new insights and perspectives. Curr Zool 67:631–638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Raya F, Ibanez-Alamo JD, Parenteau C, Chaster O, Soler M (2021) Prolactin mediates behavioural rejection responses to avian brood parasitism. J Exp Biol 224:jeb240101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saether B-E (1989) The influence of body weight on the covariation between reproductive traits in European birds. Oikos 48:79–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Safran RJ, Vitousek MN (2008) Evolutionary biology: arms races in the eye of the beholder. Curr Biol 18:R734-736

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwabl H, Palacios MG, Martin TE (2007) Selection for rapid embryo development correlates with embryo exposure to maternal androgens among passerine birds. Am Nat 170:196–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soler M (2017) Avian brood parasitism. Springer Nature, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Suchard MA, Lemey P, Baele G, Ayres DL, Drummond AJ, Rambaut A (2018) Bayesian phylogenetic and phylodynamic data integration using BEAST 1.10. Virus Evol 4:vey1016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorogood R, Davies NB (2012) Cuckoos combat socially transmitted defenses of reed warbler hosts with a plumage polymorphism. Science 337:578–580

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to M. Abolins-Abols and A. Luro for discussions.

Funding

For funding, we thank the Institute for Advanced Study in Berlin, Germany and the Center for Advanced Study of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (to MEH).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MEH conceived the study; MEH, CR, and JN conceptualized the study, MEH and JN sourced the data; JN conducted the analyses; MEH and CR wrote the manuscript with input from JN.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark E. Hauber.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors have not disclosed any competing interests.

Consent for publication

All authors agree to the publication of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hauber, M.E., Riehl, C. & Nagy, J. Clutch size and the rejection of parasitic eggs: a comparative test of the maternal investment hypothesis. Evol Ecol 36, 263–272 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-022-10165-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-022-10165-w

Keywords

  • Endocrine trade-off
  • Egg rejection
  • Host-parasite coevolution
  • Relative clutch size