Skip to main content
Log in

Does courtship behavior predict parentage in Collared Lizards? Influence of male social status and habitat structure

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Evolutionary Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Incorporating microsatellite techniques to determine parentage is a powerful addition to behavioral mating system studies in wild animals. Nonetheless, in some tetrapod taxa such as lizards, there are relatively few direct comparisons of individual reproductive success measured genetically versus estimates based on behavioral interactions, especially in species where males and females do not maintain prolonged social contact. We combined observations of behavior with microsatellite analysis of parentage over ten seasons in male Collared Lizards, (Crotaphytus collaris), to test the extent to which the proportion of each female’s total courtship interactions with different males predicted the proportion of total offspring sired by those males (proportion of paternity). Territorial males (T-males) court females frequently. Non-territorial (NT) males on the other hand behave stealthily. This allows them to court females, albeit less frequently, while limiting attacks by T-males. Both T- and NT-males occupied habitats that varied in structural complexity which might influence which males court and sire offspring with individual females, therefore we included habitat type (simple vs. complex) and male social tactic as possible predictors in our test. Proportion of courtship by NT-males did not predict their proportion of paternity in either habitat type. Courtship by T-males was a strong predictor of paternity in simple habitats but not complex habitats. Our findings support the hypothesis that courtship is a more accurate predictor of T-male mating success in simple habitats, which is consistent with previous findings suggesting that reduced area and topographical heterogeneity, especially the absence of subsurface crevices in simpler habitats, makes it more economical for T-males to prevent surreptitious mating by NT-males. Our study, therefore, highlights the importance of considering possible effects of alternative social tactics and variation in environmental conditions when testing the accuracy of behaviorally based estimates of breeding relationships, especially in polygamous species with multiple paternity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

Availability of data

The dataset generated and analyzed during this study are included as supplemental material.

References

  • Abell AJ (1997) Estimating paternity with spatial behaviour and DNA fingerprinting in the striped plateau lizard, Sceloporus virgatus (Phrynosomatidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 41:217–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abell AJ (1999) Variation in clutch size and offspring size relative to environmental conditions in the lizard Sceloporus virgatus. J Herpetol 33:173–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altmann J (1974) Observational study of behaviour: sampling methods. Behav 49:227–266

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baird TA (2004) Reproductive coloration in female collared lizards, Crotophytus collaris, stimulates courtship by males. Herpetol 60:337–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baird TA (2013a) Lizards and other reptiles as model systems for the study of contest behaviour. In: Hardy ICW, Briffa M (eds) Animal contests. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 258–286

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Baird TA (2013b) Social life on the rocks: behavioural diversity and sexual selection in collared lizards. In: Lutterschmidt WI (ed) Reptiles in research: investigations of ecology, physiology and behavior from desert to sea. Nova Science Publishers, Haupauge, pp 213–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Baird TA (2018) Live fast and prosper: early territory defence is not costly in male collared lizards (Crotaphytus collaris). Biol J Linn Soc 123:628–635.

  • Baird TA, Timanus DK (1998) Social inhibition of territorial behaviour in yearling male collared lizards, Crotaphytus collaris. Anim Behav 56:989–994

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baird TA, Hews DK (2007) Homone levels in territorial and non-territorial male collared lizards. Physiol Behav 9:755–763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baird TA, Curtis JL (2010) Context-dependent acquisition of territories by male collared lizards: the role of male mortality. Behav Ecol 21:753–763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baird TA, York JR (2021) A decade of sexual selection studies reveals long-term patterns and processes of fitness variation in male collared lizards. Anim Behav 180:37–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baird TA, Acree MA, Sloan CL (1996) Age and gender-related differences in the social behavior and mating success of free-living collared lizards, Crotaphytus collaris. Copeia 1996:336–347

  • Baird TA, Sloan CL, Timanus DK (2001) Intra- and inter-seasonal variation in the socio-spatial behavior of adult male collared lizards, Crotaphytyus collaris (Reptilia, Crotaphytidae). Ethol 107:15–32

  • Baird TA, Timanus DK, Sloan CL (2003) Intra-and intersexual variation in social behavior. In: Fox SF, McCoy JK, Baird TA (eds). Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp 7–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Baird TA, Baird TD, Shine R (2020) War and peace: plasticity of aggression and the context of displays in male Australian Water Dragons. Evol Ecol 34:73–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Best TL, Pfaffenberger GS (1987) Age and sexual variation in the diet of collared lizards (Crotaphytus collaris). Southwest Natur 32:415–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun CA, Baird TA, York JR (2018) Behavioural plasticity in physically variable microhabitats: a field test of potential adaptive consequences in male collared lizards (Crotaphytus collaris). Biol J Linn Soc 125:37–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bull CM (1994) Population dynamics and pair fidelity in sleepy lizards. In: Vitt LJ, Pianka ER (eds) Lizard ecology: historical and experimental perspectives. Princeton University Press, pp 159–174

  • Bull CM, Freake MJ (1999) Home-range fidelity in the Australian sleepy lizard, Tiliqua rugosa. Aust J Zool 47:125–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bull CM, Cooper SJ, Baghurst BC (1998) Social monogamy and extra-pair fertilization in an Australian lizard, Tiliqua rugosa. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 44:63–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapple DG, Keogh JS (2005) Complex mating system and dispersal patterns in a social lizard, Egernia whitii. Mol Ecol 14:1215–1227

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock TH, Parker GA (1995) Punishment in animal societies. Nature 373:209–216

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock T, Sheldon BC (2010) Individuals and populations: the role of long-term, individual-based studies of animals in ecology and evolutionary biology. TREE 25:562–573

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock T, Huchard E (2013) Social competition and selection in males and females. Phil Trans Roy Soc B: Biol Sci 368:20130074

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper W, Greenberg N (1992) Reptilian coloration and behavior. In: Gans C, Crews D (eds) Biology of the Reptilia. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 298–422

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyson ML, Reichert MS, Halliday TR (2013) Contests in amphibians. In: Hardy ICW, Briffa M (eds) Animal contests. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 228–257

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fox SF, McCoy JK, TA Baird (2003a) Lizard Social Behavior. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox SF, McCoy JK, Baird TA (2003b) The evolutionary study of social behavior and the role of lizards as model organisms. In: Fox SF, McCoy JK, Baird TA (eds) Lizard social behavior. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp xi–xiv

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner MG, Bull CM, Cooper SJB (2002) High levels of genetic monogamy in the group-living Australian lizard Egernia stokesii. Mol Ecol 11:1787–1794

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner MG, Godfrey SS, Fenner AL, Donnelan SC, Bull CM (2012) Fine-scale spatial structuring as an inbreeding avoidance mechanism in the social skink Egernia stokesii. Aust J Zool 60:272–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, MG, Pearson SK, Johnston GR, Schwarz MP (2015) Group living in squamate reptiles: a review of evidence for stable aggregations. Biol Rev 91:925–936

  • Gullberg A, Olsson M, Tegelström H (1997) Male mating success, reproductive success and multiple paternity in a natural population of sand lizards: behavioral and molecular genetics data. Mol Ecol 6:105–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hacking J, Stuart-Fox D, Gardner M (2017) Very low rates of multiple paternity detected in clutches for a wild agamid lizard. Aust J Zool 65:328–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haenel G, Smith LC, John-Alder HB (2003) Home-range analysis in Sceloporus undulatus II. A test of spatial relationships and reproductive success. Copeia 2003:113–123

  • Haynie ML, Van Den Bussche RA, Hoogland JL, Gilbert DA (2003) Parentage, multiple paternity, and breeding success in Gunnison’s and Utah prairie dogs. J Mamm 84:1244–1253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes C (1998) Integrating molecular techniques with field methods in studies of social behavior: a revolution results. Ecol 79:383–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Husak JF, McCoy JK (2000) Diet composition of the collared lizard (Crotaphytus collaris) in west-central Texas. Tex J Sci 52:93–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchison DW, Strasburg JL, Brissom JA, Cummings S (2004) Isolation and characterization of 11 polymorphic microsatellite loci in collared lizards (Crotaphytus collaris). Mol Ecol Notes 4:554–556

  • Kalinowski ST, Taper ML, Marshall TC (2007) Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Mol Ecol 16:1099–1106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • LeBas N (2001) Microsatellite determination of male reproductive success in a natural population of the territorial ornate dragon lizard, Ctenophorus ornatus. Mol Ecol 10:193–203

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall T, Slate J, Kruuk L, Pemberton J (1998) Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Mol Ecol 7:639–655

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McAlpin S, Duckett P, Stow A (2011) Lizards cooperatively tunnel to construct a long-term home for family members. PLoS ONE 6:e19041

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison SF, Keogh JS, Scott AW (2002) Molecular determination of paternity in a natural population of the multiple mating polygynous lizard Eulamultiple paternityrus heatwolei. Mol Ecol 11:535–545

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Olsson M, Schwartz TS, Wapstra E, Shine R (2019) How accurately do behavioral observations predict reproductive success in free-ranging lizards? Biol Lett 15:20190030

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Pryke SR (2013) Bird contests: from hatching to fertilisation. In: Hardy IWC, Briffa M (eds) Animal contests. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 287–303

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal GG, Stuart-Fox D (2012) Environmental disturbance and animal communication. In: Candolin U, Wong BBM (eds) Behavioral responses to a changing world. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 16–31

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Salvador A, Díaz JA, Viega JP, Bloor P, Brown RP (2007) Correlates of reproductive success in male lizards of the alpine species Iberolacerta cyreni. Behav Ecol 19:169–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stow AJ, Sunnocks P (2004) High mate and site fidelity in Cunningham’s skinks (Egernia cunninghami) in natural and fragmented habitat. Mol Ecol 13:419–430

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Telemeco RS, Baird TA (2011) Capital energy drives production of multiple clutches whereas income energy fuels growth in female collared lizards Crotaphytus collaris. Oikos 120:915–921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uller T, Olsson M (2008) Multiple paternity in reptiles: patterns and processes. Mol Ecol 17:2566–2580

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Oosterhout C, Hutchinson WF, Wills DP, Shipley P (2004) MICRO-CHECKER: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Mol Ecol Notes 4:535–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whiting MJ, Nagy KA, Bateman PW (2003) Evaluation and maintenance of social status signalling badges. In: Fox SF, McCoy JK, Baird TA (eds). Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp 47–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiting MJ, Miles DB (2019) Behavioral ecology and aggression in lizards. In: Bels VL, Russell AP (eds) Behavior of lizards: evolutionary and mechanistic perspectives. CRC Press, Taylor, pp 289–319

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • York JR, Baird TA (2015) Testing the adaptive significance of sex-specific mating tactics in collared lizards (Crotaphytus collaris). Biol J Linn Soc 115:423–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • York JR, Baird TA (2017) Sexual selection on male collared lizard (Crotaphytus collaris) display behaviour enhances offspring survivorship. Biol J Linn Soc 122:176–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • York JR, Baird TA (2019) Sexual selection on female collared lizards favours offspring production with multiple males. Anim Behav 147:17–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Arcadia Lake Park, Edmond, OK for access to the study site. This research was conducted with the permission of the Oklahoma Department of Wildlife and Institutional and Animal Care and Use Committee at the University of Central Oklahoma to TAB. We thank C.A. Braun, J. Creecy, G. French, M. Haynie, J. Hertzler, S. Hoge, A. Lunsford, A. McGee, C. McGill, C. Moya, D. O’Connor, A. Ruger, Y. Shirali, W. Unsell, and E. York for technical assistance in the field and laboratory, and T.D. Baird for photography.

Funding

We greatly appreciate funding provided by from the Office of Research and Sponsored Programs at the University of Central Oklahoma.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Troy A. Baird conceived the study, recorded the behavioral data, and collected the blood samples for genetic analyses. Joshua R. York conducted laboratory and genetic analyses, and both authors analyzed the data. TAB wrote the first manuscript draft, both authors made revisions, approved the final manuscript, and provide consent for publication.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Troy A. Baird.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval

This research was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University of Central Oklahoma (IACUC, permit number 13009) and the Oklahoma Department of Wildlife (permit number 5553).

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Supplementary Material 2

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Baird, T.A., York, J.R. Does courtship behavior predict parentage in Collared Lizards? Influence of male social status and habitat structure. Evol Ecol 35, 795–808 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-021-10136-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-021-10136-7

Keywords