Abstract
The evolution of sexually dimorphic ornamentation should reflect sex differences in a form of parental care, incubation behavior, but empirical support is scarce after controlling for phylogenetic inertia. Here, using phylogenetic comparative methods in swallows and martins (Aves: Hirundinidae), we studied the evolution of sexual dimorphism in tail length in relation to two incubation types, female-only and biparental incubation. We found that species with biparental incubation were more likely to have sexually monomorphic tails compared to species with female-only incubation. Furthermore, an analysis of evolutionary pathways suggested interdependent evolution of biparental incubation and sexual tail dimorphism; transitions to biparental incubation and sexual tail dimorphism were less likely to occur than transitions from that state. This finding is consistent with the hypothesis that selection on male ornamentation matters during the incubation period. We also confirmed that species with biparental incubation had significantly lower rates of extra-pair paternity compared to species with female-only incubation in this clade, providing additional support for the importance of selection on male ornamentation during the incubation period. The current study is one of few phylogenetic comparative studies demonstrating the correlated evolution of biparental incubation and sexual dimorphism in ornamentation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data archiving
Included in supplementary material and osf.io (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/CVJ34).
References
Andersson M (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton Univ Press, Princeton
Aparcio JM, Bonal R, Cordero P (2003) Evolution of the structure of tail feathers: implications for the theory of sexual selection. Evolution 57:397–405
Badyaev AV, Hill GE (2003) Avian sexual dichromatism in relation to phylogeny and ecology. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34:27–49
Bókony V, Garamszegi LZ, Hirschenhauser K, Liker A (2008) Testosterone and melanin-based black plumage coloration: a comparative study. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62:1229–1238
Brouwer L, Griffith SC (2019) Extra-pair paternity in birds. Mol Ecol 28:4864–4882
Cuervo JJ, Møller AP (1999) Phenotypic variation and fluctuating asymmetry in sexually dimorphic feather ornaments in relation to sex and mating system. Biol J Linn Soc 68:505–529
Cuervo JJ, Møller AP (2000) Sex-limited expression of ornamental feathers in birds. Behav Ecol 11:246–259
Dale J, Dey CJ, Delhey K, Kempenaers B, Valcu M (2015) The effects of life history and sexual selection on male and female plumage colouration. Nature 527:367–370
del Hoyo J, Elliott A, Sargatal J, Christie DA, de Juana E (2020) Handbook of the Birds of the World Alive. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona. Retrieved from https://www.hbw.com on 2 March 2020
de Villemereuil P, Nakagawa S (2014) General quantitative genetic methods for comparative biology. In: Garamszegi LZ (ed) Modern phylogenetic comparative methods and their application in evolutionary biology: concepts and practice. Springer, New York, pp 287–301
Dunn PO, Whittingham LA, Pitcher TE (2001) Mating systems, sperm competition, and the evolution of sexual dimorphism in birds. Evolution 55:161–175
Ferretti V, Massoni V, Liljesthröm M, Lacoretz MV, Winkler DQ (2019) Temperate-tropical variation in breeding synchrony and extra- pair paternity among new world Tachycineta swallows. Sci Rep 9:12713
Friedman NR, Hofmann CM, Kondo B, Omland KE (2009) Correlated evolution of migration and sexual dichromatism in the new world orioles (Icterus). Evolution 63:3269–3274
Garamszegi LZ, Mundry R (2014) Multimodel-inference in comparative analyses. In: Garamszegi LZ (ed) Modern phylogenetic comparative methods and their application in evolutionary biology: concepts and practice. Springer, New York, pp 305–331
Hadfield JD (2010) MCMC methods for multi-response generalized linear mixed models: the MCMCglmm R package. J Stat Softw 33:1–22
Hasegawa M, Arai E (2017a) Natural selection on wing and tail morphology in the Pacific Swallow. J Ornithol 158:851–858
Hasegawa M, Arai E (2017b) Egg size decreases with increasing female fork tail in family Hirundinidae. Evol Ecol 31:559–569
Hasegawa M, Arai E (2018) Sexually dimorphic swallows have higher extinction risk. Ecol Evol 8:992–996
Hasegawa M, Arai E (2020) Fork tails evolved differently in swallows and swifts. J Evol Biol 33:911–919
Hasegawa M, Arai E, Kutsukake N (2016) Evolution of tail fork depth in genus Hirundo. Ecol Evol 6:851–858
Johnson AE, Mitchell JS, Brown MB (2016) Convergent evolution in social swallows (Aves: Hirundinidae). Ecol Evol 7:550–560
Kass RE, Carlin BP, Gelman A, Neal R (1998) Markov chain Monte Carlo in practice: a round table discussion. Am Stat 52:93–100
Ketterson ED, Nolan VJ (1994) Male parental behaviour in birds. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 25:601–628
Kokko H, Jennions MD (2008) Parental investment, sexual selection and sex ratios. J Evol Biol 21:919–948
Kraaijeveld K, Kraaijeveld-Smi F, Komdeur J (2007) The evolution of mutual ornamentation. Anim Behav 74:657–677
Lifjeld JT, Gohli J, Albrecht T, Garcia-del-Rey E, Johannessen LK, Kleven O, Marki PZ, Omotoriogun TC, Rowe M, Johnsen A (2019) Evolution of female promiscuity in Passerides songbirds. BMC Evol Biol 19:169
Ligon RA, Diaz CD, Morano JL, Troscianko J, Stevens M, Moskeland A et al (2018) Evolution of correlated complexity in the radically different courtship signals of birds-of-paradise. PLoS Biol 16:e2006962
Magrath MJL, Komdeur J (2003) Is male care compromised by additional mating opportunity? Trends Ecol Evol 18:424–430
Matysioková B, Remeš V (2013) Faithful females receive more help: the extent of male parental care during incubation in relation to extra-pair paternity in songbirds. J Evol Biol 26:155–162
Matysioková B, Remeš V, Cockburn A (2017) Broad-scale variation in sexual dichromatism in songbirds is not explained by sex differences in exposure to predators during incubation. J Avian Biol 48:1322–1330
Møller AP (1988) Female choice selects for male sexual tail ornaments in the monogamous swallow. Nature 332:640–642
Møller AP (1994) Sexual selection and the barn swallow. Oxford Univ Press, Oxford
Møller AP, Birkhead TR (1994) The evolution of plumage brightness in birds is related to extrapair paternity. Evolution 48:1089–1100
Møller AP, Cuervo JJ (2000) The evolution of paternity and paternal care in birds. Behav Ecol 11:472–485
Møller AP, Chabi Y, Cuervo JJ, De Lope F, Kilpimaa J, Kose M, Matyjasiak P, Pap PL, Saino N, Sakraoui R, Schifferli L, von Hirschheydt J (2006) An analysis of continent-wide patterns of sexual selection in a passerine bird. Evolution 60:856–868
Owens IPF, Hartley IR (1998) Sexual dimorphism in birds: why are there so many different forms of dimorphism? Proc R Soc Lond B 265:397–407
Pagel M (1999) Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution. Nature 401:877–884
R Core Team (2020) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. http://www.R-project.org/. Accessed 9 March 2020
Rowe LV, Evans MR, Buchanan KL (2001) The function and evolution of the tail streamer in hirundines. Behav Ecol 12:157–163
Schluter D, Price T (1993) Honesty, perception and population divergence in sexually selected traits. Proc R Soc Lond B 253:117–122
Schwagmeyer PL, Clair RCS, Moodie JD, Lamey TC, Schnell GD, Moodie MN (1999) Species differences in male parental care in birds: a reexamination of correlates with paternity. Auk 116:487–503
Simpson RK, Johnson MA, Murphy TG (2015) Migration and the evolution of sexual dichromatism: evolutionary loss of female coloration with migration among wood-warblers. Proc R Soc Lond B 282:2015375
Tobias JA, Montgomerie R, Lyon BE (2012) The evolution of female ornaments and weaponry: social selection, sexual selection and ecological competition. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 367:2274–2293
Turner AK (2006) The barn swallow. T & A D Poyser, London
Turner AK, Rose C (1994) A handbook to the swallows and martins of the world. Christopher Helm, London
Wallace AR (1889) Darwinism: an exposition of the theory of natural selection with some of its applications. MacMillan, London
Winquist T, Lemon RE (1994) Sexual selection and exaggerated male tail length in birds. Am Nat 143:95–116
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr. Shumpei Kitamura and his lab members at Ishikawa Prefectural University for their kindest advices. We are grateful to Dr. Angela Turner for her kindly support on the valuable information on swallows. MH was supported by the Research Fellowship of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS, 15J10000).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
MH conceived the research and wrote the draft, EA and MH collected field data. All co-authors contributed to manuscript writing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hasegawa, M., Arai, E. Correlated evolution of biparental incubation and sexual tail monomorphism in swallows and martins (Aves: Hirundinidae). Evol Ecol 34, 777–788 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-020-10066-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-020-10066-w