Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Correlated evolution of biparental incubation and sexual tail monomorphism in swallows and martins (Aves: Hirundinidae)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Evolutionary Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The evolution of sexually dimorphic ornamentation should reflect sex differences in a form of parental care, incubation behavior, but empirical support is scarce after controlling for phylogenetic inertia. Here, using phylogenetic comparative methods in swallows and martins (Aves: Hirundinidae), we studied the evolution of sexual dimorphism in tail length in relation to two incubation types, female-only and biparental incubation. We found that species with biparental incubation were more likely to have sexually monomorphic tails compared to species with female-only incubation. Furthermore, an analysis of evolutionary pathways suggested interdependent evolution of biparental incubation and sexual tail dimorphism; transitions to biparental incubation and sexual tail dimorphism were less likely to occur than transitions from that state. This finding is consistent with the hypothesis that selection on male ornamentation matters during the incubation period. We also confirmed that species with biparental incubation had significantly lower rates of extra-pair paternity compared to species with female-only incubation in this clade, providing additional support for the importance of selection on male ornamentation during the incubation period. The current study is one of few phylogenetic comparative studies demonstrating the correlated evolution of biparental incubation and sexual dimorphism in ornamentation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data archiving

Included in supplementary material and osf.io (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/CVJ34).

References

  • Andersson M (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton Univ Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Aparcio JM, Bonal R, Cordero P (2003) Evolution of the structure of tail feathers: implications for the theory of sexual selection. Evolution 57:397–405

    Google Scholar 

  • Badyaev AV, Hill GE (2003) Avian sexual dichromatism in relation to phylogeny and ecology. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34:27–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Bókony V, Garamszegi LZ, Hirschenhauser K, Liker A (2008) Testosterone and melanin-based black plumage coloration: a comparative study. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62:1229–1238

    Google Scholar 

  • Brouwer L, Griffith SC (2019) Extra-pair paternity in birds. Mol Ecol 28:4864–4882

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cuervo JJ, Møller AP (1999) Phenotypic variation and fluctuating asymmetry in sexually dimorphic feather ornaments in relation to sex and mating system. Biol J Linn Soc 68:505–529

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuervo JJ, Møller AP (2000) Sex-limited expression of ornamental feathers in birds. Behav Ecol 11:246–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale J, Dey CJ, Delhey K, Kempenaers B, Valcu M (2015) The effects of life history and sexual selection on male and female plumage colouration. Nature 527:367–370

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • del Hoyo J, Elliott A, Sargatal J, Christie DA, de Juana E (2020) Handbook of the Birds of the World Alive. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona. Retrieved from https://www.hbw.com on 2 March 2020

  • de Villemereuil P, Nakagawa S (2014) General quantitative genetic methods for comparative biology. In: Garamszegi LZ (ed) Modern phylogenetic comparative methods and their application in evolutionary biology: concepts and practice. Springer, New York, pp 287–301

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn PO, Whittingham LA, Pitcher TE (2001) Mating systems, sperm competition, and the evolution of sexual dimorphism in birds. Evolution 55:161–175

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ferretti V, Massoni V, Liljesthröm M, Lacoretz MV, Winkler DQ (2019) Temperate-tropical variation in breeding synchrony and extra- pair paternity among new world Tachycineta swallows. Sci Rep 9:12713

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman NR, Hofmann CM, Kondo B, Omland KE (2009) Correlated evolution of migration and sexual dichromatism in the new world orioles (Icterus). Evolution 63:3269–3274

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garamszegi LZ, Mundry R (2014) Multimodel-inference in comparative analyses. In: Garamszegi LZ (ed) Modern phylogenetic comparative methods and their application in evolutionary biology: concepts and practice. Springer, New York, pp 305–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadfield JD (2010) MCMC methods for multi-response generalized linear mixed models: the MCMCglmm R package. J Stat Softw 33:1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasegawa M, Arai E (2017a) Natural selection on wing and tail morphology in the Pacific Swallow. J Ornithol 158:851–858

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasegawa M, Arai E (2017b) Egg size decreases with increasing female fork tail in family Hirundinidae. Evol Ecol 31:559–569

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasegawa M, Arai E (2018) Sexually dimorphic swallows have higher extinction risk. Ecol Evol 8:992–996

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hasegawa M, Arai E (2020) Fork tails evolved differently in swallows and swifts. J Evol Biol 33:911–919

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hasegawa M, Arai E, Kutsukake N (2016) Evolution of tail fork depth in genus Hirundo. Ecol Evol 6:851–858

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson AE, Mitchell JS, Brown MB (2016) Convergent evolution in social swallows (Aves: Hirundinidae). Ecol Evol 7:550–560

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kass RE, Carlin BP, Gelman A, Neal R (1998) Markov chain Monte Carlo in practice: a round table discussion. Am Stat 52:93–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Ketterson ED, Nolan VJ (1994) Male parental behaviour in birds. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 25:601–628

    Google Scholar 

  • Kokko H, Jennions MD (2008) Parental investment, sexual selection and sex ratios. J Evol Biol 21:919–948

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kraaijeveld K, Kraaijeveld-Smi F, Komdeur J (2007) The evolution of mutual ornamentation. Anim Behav 74:657–677

    Google Scholar 

  • Lifjeld JT, Gohli J, Albrecht T, Garcia-del-Rey E, Johannessen LK, Kleven O, Marki PZ, Omotoriogun TC, Rowe M, Johnsen A (2019) Evolution of female promiscuity in Passerides songbirds. BMC Evol Biol 19:169

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ligon RA, Diaz CD, Morano JL, Troscianko J, Stevens M, Moskeland A et al (2018) Evolution of correlated complexity in the radically different courtship signals of birds-of-paradise. PLoS Biol 16:e2006962

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Magrath MJL, Komdeur J (2003) Is male care compromised by additional mating opportunity? Trends Ecol Evol 18:424–430

    Google Scholar 

  • Matysioková B, Remeš V (2013) Faithful females receive more help: the extent of male parental care during incubation in relation to extra-pair paternity in songbirds. J Evol Biol 26:155–162

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Matysioková B, Remeš V, Cockburn A (2017) Broad-scale variation in sexual dichromatism in songbirds is not explained by sex differences in exposure to predators during incubation. J Avian Biol 48:1322–1330

    Google Scholar 

  • Møller AP (1988) Female choice selects for male sexual tail ornaments in the monogamous swallow. Nature 332:640–642

    Google Scholar 

  • Møller AP (1994) Sexual selection and the barn swallow. Oxford Univ Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Møller AP, Birkhead TR (1994) The evolution of plumage brightness in birds is related to extrapair paternity. Evolution 48:1089–1100

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Møller AP, Cuervo JJ (2000) The evolution of paternity and paternal care in birds. Behav Ecol 11:472–485

    Google Scholar 

  • Møller AP, Chabi Y, Cuervo JJ, De Lope F, Kilpimaa J, Kose M, Matyjasiak P, Pap PL, Saino N, Sakraoui R, Schifferli L, von Hirschheydt J (2006) An analysis of continent-wide patterns of sexual selection in a passerine bird. Evolution 60:856–868

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Owens IPF, Hartley IR (1998) Sexual dimorphism in birds: why are there so many different forms of dimorphism? Proc R Soc Lond B 265:397–407

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagel M (1999) Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution. Nature 401:877–884

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2020) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. http://www.R-project.org/. Accessed 9 March 2020

  • Rowe LV, Evans MR, Buchanan KL (2001) The function and evolution of the tail streamer in hirundines. Behav Ecol 12:157–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Schluter D, Price T (1993) Honesty, perception and population divergence in sexually selected traits. Proc R Soc Lond B 253:117–122

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schwagmeyer PL, Clair RCS, Moodie JD, Lamey TC, Schnell GD, Moodie MN (1999) Species differences in male parental care in birds: a reexamination of correlates with paternity. Auk 116:487–503

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson RK, Johnson MA, Murphy TG (2015) Migration and the evolution of sexual dichromatism: evolutionary loss of female coloration with migration among wood-warblers. Proc R Soc Lond B 282:2015375

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobias JA, Montgomerie R, Lyon BE (2012) The evolution of female ornaments and weaponry: social selection, sexual selection and ecological competition. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 367:2274–2293

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner AK (2006) The barn swallow. T & A D Poyser, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner AK, Rose C (1994) A handbook to the swallows and martins of the world. Christopher Helm, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace AR (1889) Darwinism: an exposition of the theory of natural selection with some of its applications. MacMillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Winquist T, Lemon RE (1994) Sexual selection and exaggerated male tail length in birds. Am Nat 143:95–116

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Shumpei Kitamura and his lab members at Ishikawa Prefectural University for their kindest advices. We are grateful to Dr. Angela Turner for her kindly support on the valuable information on swallows. MH was supported by the Research Fellowship of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS, 15J10000).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Environmental Science, Ishikawa Prefectural University, Nonoichi, Ishikawa, 921-8836, Japan

    Masaru Hasegawa

  2. Department of Evolutionary Studies of Biosystems, Sokendai, The Graduate University for Advanced Studies, Hayama, Japan

    Emi Arai

Authors
  1. Masaru Hasegawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Emi Arai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

MH conceived the research and wrote the draft, EA and MH collected field data. All co-authors contributed to manuscript writing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masaru Hasegawa.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 3064 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hasegawa, M., Arai, E. Correlated evolution of biparental incubation and sexual tail monomorphism in swallows and martins (Aves: Hirundinidae). Evol Ecol 34, 777–788 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-020-10066-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-020-10066-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation