Abstract
A wide range of factors drive the processes responsible for range dynamics following a successful invasion. These drive changes to the demographic and genetic qualities of the invasive species, potentially with long-term consequences. The invasion triangle encapsulates the complexity of the processes by organizing these factors into three major components: invader, site biotic characteristics, and environment. The invasion triangle is analogous to the disease triangle, which is foundational to the field of plant pathology. Yet, in the field of biological invasions, the model has been underutilised. By incorporating various factors attributed to invasions into the three components, the invasion triangle can be an invaluable tool in explaining both the success and collapse of invasive ranges. Here, we introduce a new interpretation of the invasion triangle that explicitly considers changes with time, and apply it to explain the changes in invasive species ranges. There is mounting evidence that invasiveness tends to reduce following successful initial invasion, particularly after an exponential increase in population. Drawing from the attributes of invaders and the observed changes in the ranges of invasive taxa, we explore different types of dynamics in the context of the invasion triangle. The new invasion triangle can form the basis for predicting change to invasive ranges, and should also prove useful in directing future research and management.


Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aubret F (2015) Island colonisation and the evolutionary rates of body size in insular neonate snakes. Heredity 115:349
Aubret F, Shine R (2009) Genetic assimilation and the postcolonization erosion of phenotypic plasticity in island tiger snakes. Curr Biol 19:1932–1936
Blackburn TM, Pyšek P, Bacher S, Carlton JT, Duncan RP, Jarošík V, Wilson JR, Richardson DM (2011) A proposed unified framework for biological invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 26:333–339
Buswell JM, Moles AT, Hartley S (2011) Is rapid evolution common in introduced plant species? J Ecol 99:214–224
Callaway RM, Ridenour WM (2004) Novel weapons: invasive success and the evolution of increased competitive ability. Front Ecol Environ 2:436–443
Carpenter D, Cappuccino N (2005) Herbivory, time since introduction and the invasiveness of exotic plants. J Ecol 93:315–321
Catford JA, Jansson R, Nilsson C (2009) Reducing redundancy in invasion ecology by integrating hypotheses into a single theoretical framework. Divers Distrib 15:22–40
Chuang A, Peterson CR (2016) Expanding population edges: theories, traits, and trade-offs. Glob Chang Biol 22:494–512
Cohen Y (2002) Populations of Phytophthora infestans in Israel underwent three major genetic changes during 1983 to 2000. Phytopathology 92:300–307
Colautti RI, Ricciardi A, Grigorovich IA, MacIsaac HJ (2004) Is invasion success explained by the enemy release hypothesis? Ecol Lett 7:721–733
Dai ZC, Fu W, Wan LY, Cai HH, Wang N, Qi SS, Du DL (2016) Different growth promoting effects of endophytic bacteria on invasive and native clonal plants. Front Plant Sci 7:706
Dita M, Barquero M, Heck D, Mizubuti ES, Staver CP (2018) Fusarium wilt of banana: current knowledge on epidemiology and research needs toward sustainable disease management. Front Plant Sci 9:1468
Dostál P, Müllerová J, Pyšek P, Pergl J, Klinerová T (2013) The impact of an invasive plant changes over time. Ecol Lett 16:1277–1284
Edgell TC, Lynch BR, Trussell GC, Palmer AR (2009) Experimental evidence for the rapid evolution of behavioral canalization in natural populations. Am Nat 174:434–440
Erfmeier AM, Böhnke M, Bruelheide H (2011) Secondary invasion of Acer negundo: the role of phenotypic responses versus local adaptation. Biol Invasions 13:1599–1614
Etterson JR, Delf DE, Craig TP, Ando Y, Ohgushi T (2008) Parallel patterns of clinal variation in Solidago altissima in its native range in central USA and its invasive range in Japan. Botany 86:91–97
Fazlioglu F, Bonser SP (2016) Phenotypic plasticity and specialization in clonal versus non-clonal plants: A data synthesis. Acta Oecol 77:193–200
Felker-Quinn E, Schweitzer JA, Bailey JK (2013) Meta-analysis reveals evolution in invasive plant species but little support for evolution of increased competitive ability (EICA). Ecol Evol 3:739–751
Flores-Moreno H, García-Treviño ES, Letten AD, Moles AT (2015) In the beginning: phenotypic change in three invasive species through their first two centuries since introduction. Biol Invasions 17:1215–1225
Geng Y, van Klinken RD, Sosa A, Li B, Chen J, Xu CY (2016) The relative importance of genetic diversity and phenotypic plasticity in determining invasion success of a clonal weed in the USA and China. Front Plant Sci 7:213
Green PT, O’Dowd DJ, Abbott KL, Jeffery M, Retallick K, Mac Nally R (2011) Invasional meltdown: invader–invader mutualism facilitates a secondary invasion. Ecology 92:1758–1768
Hawkes CV (2007) Are invaders moving targets? The generality and persistence of advantages in size, reproduction, and enemy release in invasive plant species with time since introduction. Am Nat 170:832–843
Hayes KR, Barry SC (2008) Are there any consistent predictors of invasion success? Biol Invasions 10:483–506
Heger T, Jeschke JM (2014) The enemy release hypothesis as a hierarchy of hypotheses. Oikos 123:741–750
Hu J, Diao Y, Zhou Y, Lin D, Bi Y, Pang Z, Fryxell RT, Liu X, Lamour K (2013) Loss of heterozygosity drives clonal diversity of Phytophthora capsici in China. PLoS ONE 8:e82691
Iacarella JC, Mankiewicz PS, Ricciardi A (2015) Negative competitive effects of invasive plants change with time since invasion. Ecosphere 6:1–4
Jauni M, Gripenberg S, Ramula S (2014) Non-native plant species benefit from disturbance: a meta-analysis. Oikos 124:122–129
Jeschke J, Aparicio LG, Haider S, Heger T, Lortie C, Pyšek P, Strayer D (2012) Support for major hypotheses in invasion biology is uneven and declining. NeoBiota 14:1
Keane RM, Crawley MJ (2002) Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis. Trends Ecol Evol 17:164–170
Kurr M, Davies AJ (2017) Time-since-invasion increases native mesoherbivore feeding rates on the invasive alga, Sargassum muticum (Yendo) Fensholt. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 98:1935–1944
Le Roux JJ, Wieczorek AM, Wright MG, Tran CT (2007) Super-genotype: global monoclonality defies the odds of nature. PLoS ONE 2:e590
Lee CE (2002) Evolutionary genetics of invasive species. Trends Ecol Evol 17:386–391
Leger EA, Goergen EM (2017) Invasive Bromus tectorum alters natural selection in arid systems. J Ecol 105:1509–1520
Levine JM, Adler PB, Yelenik SG (2004) A meta-analysis of biotic resistance to exotic plant invasions. Ecol Lett 7:975–989
Li XM, She DY, Zhang DY, Liao WJ (2015) Life history trait differentiation and local adaptation in invasive populations of Ambrosia artemisiifolia in China. Oecologia 177:669–677
McCormick MK, Kettenring KM, Baron HM, Whigham DF (2010) Spread of invasive Phragmites australis in estuaries with differing degrees of development: genetic patterns, Allee effects and interpretation. J Ecol 98:1369–1378
Moran EV, Alexander JM (2014) Evolutionary responses to global change: lessons from invasive species. Ecol Lett 17:637–649
Nosil P, Feder JL, Flaxman SM, Gompert Z (2017) Tipping points in the dynamics of speciation. Nat Ecol Evol 1:0001
Peischl S, Excoffier L (2015) Expansion load: recessive mutations and the role of standing genetic variation. Mol Ecol 24:2084–2094
Perkins LB, Nowak RS (2013) Invasion syndromes: hypotheses on relationships among invasive species attributes and characteristics of invaded sites. J Arid Land 5:275–283
Perkins LB, Leger EA, Nowak RS (2011) Invasion triangle: an organizational framework for species invasion. Ecol Evol 1:610–625
Polechová J, Barton NH (2015) Limits to adaptation along environmental gradients. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112:6401–6406
Prentis PJ, Wilson JR, Dormontt EE, Richardson DM, Lowe AJ (2008) Adaptive evolution in invasive species. Trends Plant Sci 13:288–294
Roman J, Darling J (2007) Paradox lost: genetic diversity and the success of aquatic invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 22:454–464
Rowe CLJ, Leger EA (2011) Competitive seedlings and inherited traits: a test of rapid evolution of Elymus multisetus (big squirreltail) in response to cheatgrass invasion. Evol Appl 4:485–498
Scholthof KB (2007) The disease triangle: pathogens, the environment and society. Nat Rev Microbiol 5:152
Simberloff D, Gibbons L (2004) Now you see them, now you don’t!—population crashes of established introduced species. Biol Invasions 6:161–172
Sutherst RW (2004) Global change and human vulnerability to vector-borne diseases. Clin Microbiol Rev 17:136–173
Tartally A, Antonova V, Espadaler X, Csősz S, Czechowski W (2016) Collapse of the invasive garden ant, Lasius neglectus, populations in four European countries. Biol Invasions 18:3127–3131
Tsutsui ND, Suarez AV, Holway DA, Case TJ (2000) Reduced genetic variation and the success of an invasive species. Proc Natl Acad Sci 97:5948–5953
van Kleunen M, Weber E, Fischer M (2010) A meta-analysis of trait differences between invasive and non-invasive plant species. Ecol Lett 2:235–245
Vila-Aiub MM, Neve P, Powles SB (2009) Fitness costs associated with evolved herbicide resistance alleles in plants. New Phytol 184:751–767
Wan JSH, Fazlioglu F, Bonser SP (2018) Loss of plasticity in life-history strategy associated with secondary invasion into stressful environments in invasive narrowleaf plantain (Plantago lanceolata L.). Aust Ecol 43:752–762
Yeaman S, Whitlock MC (2011) The genetic architecture of adaptation under migration–selection balance. Evolution 65:1897–1911
Zhou J, Dong BC, Alpert P, Li HL, Zhang MX, Lei GC, Yu FH (2011) Effects of soil nutrient heterogeneity on intraspecific competition in the invasive, clonal plant Alternanthera philoxeroides. Ann Bot 109:813–818
Acknowledgements
The authors are very grateful to the two anonymous reviewers who provided helpful comments that improved this work. We thank Carla Sgrò and Jake M Alexander for their helpful comments on the thesis of JSHW that inspired this work. Thank you to Edward CY Liew for the detailed introduction to the disease triangle.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wan, J.S.H., Rutherford, S. & Bonser, S.P. The invasion triangle in the range dynamics of invasive species following successful establishment. Evol Ecol 33, 299–312 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-019-09986-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-019-09986-z
