Advertisement

Evolutionary Ecology

, Volume 32, Issue 2–3, pp 247–263 | Cite as

Resolving spatio-temporal uncertainty in rare resource acquisition: smell the shell

  • Leah Valdes
  • Mark E. Laidre
Original Paper

Abstract

Complex environments present substantial spatio-temporal uncertainty in where and when rare ecological resources become available. How animals navigate this uncertainty to turn the seemingly unpredictable into the predictable is a fundamental question in evolutionary ecology. Here we use subtidal hermit crabs (Pagurus acadianus) as a model system to experimentally test in the field how animals resolve spatio-temporal uncertainty in resource availability. Quadrat sampling within the subtidal zone revealed that hermit crabs face an extreme ecological challenge, based on the rarity of empty shells across space and time. We show how this spatio-temporal uncertainty is ultimately resolved using long-distance chemical cues, which are associated with non-destructive shell predation on living gastropods, the original source of shells. By experimentally releasing cues that simulated the chemical by-products of predation, we reveal that certain flesh cues provide fine-grained information about the precise spatial and temporal window of new shell availability. These cues were most attractive to individuals with the greatest existing resource needs, and in the absence of this information individuals were highly constrained in their ability to discover newly available resources. Broadly, these experiments reveal that exploiting simple cues from heterospecific predators can provide a solution to the general ecological challenge of finding resources that are rare in space and time.

Keywords

Cues Information Spatio-temporal uncertainty Resource acquisition Predation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was approved by Shoals Marine Laboratory. For valuable field support we thank SML staff, especially Jim Coyer, Mike Rosen, Amber Litterer, Katy Bland, Bonny Clarke, and SML director Jennifer Seavey. We are grateful to all members of the Laidre lab for helpful feedback on the manuscript during a fall 2017 presentation. This research was supported by Dartmouth College startup funds to ML, a UGAR grant to LV and ML, and support from SML. We are especially grateful to Bill Kneisel for his generous gift supporting this line of research. The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Supplementary material

10682_2018_9937_MOESM1_ESM.docx (391 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 390 kb)
Video S1

Crab’s eye view of the poor visibility in the subtidal as seaweed washes back and forth in waves, obscuring the view. Footage is of a hermit crab (Pagurus acadianus) in the subtidal of the Isle of Shoals (MOV 22165 kb)

References

  1. Alcaraz G, Arce E (2017) Predator discrimination in the hermit crab Calcinus californiensis: tight for shell breakers, loose for shell peelers. Oikos 126:1299–1307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Asahina K, Pavlenkovich V, Vosshall LB (2008) The survival advantage of olfaction in a competitive environment. Curr Biol 18:1153–1155CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Bates KM, Laidre ME (2018) When to socialize: perception of time-sensitive social structures among social hermit crabs. Anim Behav 138:19–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bertness MD (1981) Conflicting advantages in resource utilization: the hermit crab housing dilemma. Am Nat 118:432–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Breithaupt T, Thiel M (2011) Chemical communication in crustaceans. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carriker MR (1981) Shell penetration and feeding by naticacean and muricacean predatory gastropods: a synthesis. Malacologia 20:403–422Google Scholar
  7. Cronin TW, Johnsen S, Marshall NJ, Warrant EJ (2014) Visual ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  8. Dall SRX, Giraldeau LA, Olsson O, McNamara JM, Stephens DW (2005) Information and its use by animals in evolutionary ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 20:187–193CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Gherardi F, Tricarico E (2011) Chemical ecology and social behaviour of Anomura. In: Breithaupt T, Thiel M (eds) Chemical communication in crustaceans. Springer, New York, pp 297–312Google Scholar
  10. Grant WC (1963) Notes on the ecology and behavior of the hermit crab, Pagurus acadianus. Ecology 44:767–771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Greggor AL, Laidre ME (2016) Food fights: aggregations of marine hermit crabs (Pagurus samuelis) compete equally for food- and shell-related carrion. Bull Mar Sci 92:293–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hanley ME, Collins SA, Swann C (2011) Advertising acceptability: is mollusk olfaction important in seedling selection? Plant Ecol 212:727–731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Harzsch S, Krieger J (2018) Crustacean olfactory systems: a comparative review and a crustacean perspective on olfaction in insects. Prog Neurobiol 161:23–60CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Hazlett B (1981) The behavioral ecology of hermit crabs. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 12:1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hussey NE, Kessel ST, Aarestrup K et al (2015) Aquatic animal telemetry: a panoramic window into the underwater world. Science 348:1255642CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Laidre ME (2007) Vulnerability and reliable signaling in conflicts between hermit crabs. Behav Ecol 18:736–741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Laidre ME (2010) How rugged individualists enable one another to find food and shelter: field experiments with tropical hermit crabs. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 277:1361–1369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Laidre ME (2011) Ecological relations between hermit crabs and their shell-supplying gastropods: constrained consumers. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 397:65–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Laidre ME (2012a) Niche construction drives social dependence in hermit crabs. Curr Biol 22:R861–R863CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Laidre ME (2012b) Homes for hermits: temporal, spatial and structural dynamics as transportable homes are incorporated into a population. J Zool 288:33–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Laidre ME (2013) Eavesdropping foragers use level of collective commotion as public information to target high quality patches. Oikos 122:1505–1511Google Scholar
  22. Laidre ME (2014) The social lives of hermits. Nat Hist 122:24–29Google Scholar
  23. Laidre ME, Elwood RW (2008) Motivation matters: cheliped extension displays in the hermit crab, Pagurus bernhardus, are honest signals of hunger. Anim Behav 75:2041–2047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Laidre ME, Greggor AL (2015) Swarms of swift scavengers: ecological role of marine intertidal hermit crabs in California. Mar Biol 162:969–977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Laidre ME, Trinh R (2014) Unlike terrestrial hermit crabs, marine hermit crabs do not prefer shells previously used by conspecifics. Crustaceana 87:856–865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Laidre ME, Vermeij GJ (2012) A biodiverse housing market in hermit crabs: proposal for a new biodiversity index. Cuadernos de Investigación UNED 4:175–179Google Scholar
  27. Laidre ME, Patten E, Pruitt L (2012) Costs of a more spacious home after remodeling by hermit crabs. J R Soc Interface 9:3574–3577CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Lawson DA, Whitney HM, Rands SA (2017) Nectar discovery speeds and multimodal displays: assessing nectar search times in bees with radiating and non-radiating guides. Evol Ecol 31:899–912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Levin SA (1992) The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology 73:1943–1967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McLean RB (1974) Direct shell acquisition by hermit crabs from gastropods. Experientia 30:206–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Moody KE, Steneck RS (1993) Mechanisms of predation among large decapod crustaceans of the Gulf of Maine Coast: functional vs. phylogenetic patterns. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 168:111–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mukhin VA, Smirnova EB, Novikov VY (2007) Peculiarities of digestive function of proteinases in invertebrates-inhabitants of cold seas. J Evol Biochem Physiol 43:476–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Noë R, Hammerstein P (1994) Biological markets: supply and demand determine the effect of partner choice in cooperation, mutualism and mating. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 35:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rittschof D (1980) Chemical attraction of hermit crabs and other attendants to simulated gastropod predation sites. J Chem Ecol 6:103–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rittschof D, Cohen JH (2004) Crustacean peptide and peptide-like pheromones and kairomones. Peptides 25:1503–1516CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Roberts L, Elliott M (2017) Good or bad vibrations? Impacts of anthropogenic vibration on the marine epibenthos. Sci Total Environ 595:255–268CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Stevens M (2013) Sensory ecology, behaviour, and evolution. Oxford University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Stutz RS, Croak BM, Proschogo N, Banks PB, McArthur C (2017) Olfactory and visual plant cues as drivers of selective herbivory. Oikos 126:259–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tran MV (2015) Behavioral reactions to novel food odors by intertidal hermit crabs. Behav Proc 113:35–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Vermeij GJ (1993) A natural history of shells. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  41. Vermeij GJ (2010) Sound reasons for silence: why do molluscs not communicate acoustically? Biol J Lin Soc 100:485–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Weissburg M, Roseman L, Chase ID (1991) Chains of opportunity: a Markov model for acquisition of reusable resources. Evol Ecol 5:105–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wilber TP, Herrnkind WF (1984) Predaceous gastropods regulate new-shell supply to salt marsh hermit crabs. Mar Biol 79:145–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesDartmouth CollegeHanoverUSA

Personalised recommendations