Evolutionary Ecology

, Volume 32, Issue 2–3, pp 159–170 | Cite as

Tracing the evolutionary origin of a visual signal: the coincidence of wrap attack and web decorating behaviours in orb web spiders (Araneidae)

Original Paper
  • 48 Downloads

Abstract

The silk decorations that adorn the webs of many orb-web spiders are thought to have a signal function, but the evolution of the decorating behaviour remains unresolved. The decoration signal is maintained apparently because it improves foraging efficiency, through either increased encounter rates with prey or reduced damage to the web. Recent investigations suggest that the decorations may originate in a regulation of the activity of the aciniform silk glands, which produce silk for both decorating the web and wrapping prey. This view predicts a link between decorating behaviour and a preference for restraining prey by wrapping with silk, which is evident among species of Argiope spiders. Here I compare the frequency of the wrap attack behaviour in four species of orb-web spiders that occupy the same habitat, but differ in their silk decorating behaviour: two species, Plebs bradleyi and Gea theridioides, build silk decorations, while the other two, Araneus hamiltoni and Backobourkia brounii do not. Spiders were presented with prey items that varied in the ease with which they could be captured, with houseflies being more easily subdued than house crickets. As predicted, the silk decorating species used wrap attacks significantly more often than non-decorating spiders, irrespective of the prey species. These data support the view that both behaviours are evolutionary linked. I propose that silk decorating originated from the evolution of wrap attacking, and that silken web decorations have later evolved into a signal and are now maintained for that function.

Keywords

Wrap attack Web decoration Signal evolution Orb web spiders 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I thank the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) for financial support (Grant No. WA2637/2-1). I am very grateful for the support of the lab of Mark Elgar (University of Melbourne), hosting me for the time of the experiments and having created a joyful working environment. I thank Mark Elgar for helpful comments on the manuscript and for always being such a supportive and encouraging mentor, co-operator and friend over the years.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The author declares that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

10682_2018_9930_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (141 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 140 kb)

References

  1. Blackledge TA (1998) Stabilimentum variation and foraging success in Argiope aurantia and Argiope trifasciata (Araneae: Araneidae). J Zool 246:21–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blackledge TA, Wenzel JW (2001) Silk mediated defense by an orb web spider against predatory mud-dauber wasps. Behaviour 138:155–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blamires SJ, Hochuli DF, Thompson MB (2008) Why cross the web: decoration spectral properties and prey capture in an orb spider (Argiope keyserlingi) web. Biol J Linn Soc 94:221–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bruce MJ (2006) Silk decorations: controversy and consensus. J Zool 269:89–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bruce MJ, Herberstein ME, Elgar MA (2001) Signalling conflict between prey and predator attraction. J Evol Biol 14:786–794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cheng R-C, Tso I-M (2007) Signaling by decorating webs: Luring prey or deterring predators? Behav Ecol 18:1085–1091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cheng R-C, Yang E-C, Lin C-P, Herberstein ME, Tso I-M (2010) Insect form vision as one potential shaping force of spider web decoration design. J Exp Biol 213:759–768CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Chou I-C, Wang P-H, Shen P-S, Tso I-M (2005) A test of prey-attracting and predator defence functions of prey carcass decorations built by Cyclosa spiders. Anim Behav 69:1055–1061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Craig CL, Bernard GD (1990) Insect attraction to ultraviolet reflecting spider webs and web decorations. Ecology 71:616–623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eberhard WG (2003) Substitution of silk stabilimenta for egg sacs by Allocyclosa bifurca (Araneae: Araneidae) suggests that silk stabilimenta function as camouflage devices. Behaviour 140:847–868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eisner T, Nowicki S (1983) Spider web protection through visual advertisement: role of the stabilimentum. Science 219:185–187CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Endler JA (1992) Signals, signal conditions, and the direction of evolution. Am Nat 139:125–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Endler JA, Day LB (2006) Ornament colour selection, visual contrast and the shape of colour preference functions in great bowerbirds, Chlamydera nuchalis. Anim Behav 72:1405–1416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Endler JA, Théry M (1996) Interacting effects of lek placement, display behavior, ambient light, and color patterns in three neotropical forest-dwelling birds. Am Nat 148:421–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Foelix RF (2011) Biology of spiders. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  16. Framenau VW, Dupérré N, Blackledge TA, Vink CJ (2010) Systematics of the new Australasian orb-weaving spider genus Backobourkia (Araneae: Araneidae: Araneinae). Arthropod Syst Phylogeny 68:79–111Google Scholar
  17. Gregorič M, Agnarsson I, Blackledge TA, Kuntner M (2015) Phylogenetic position and composition of Zygiellinae and Caerostris, with new insight into orb-web evolution and gigantism. Zool J Linn Soc-Lond 175:225–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Griswold CE, Coddington JA, Hormiga G, Scharff N (1998) Phylogeny of the orb-web building spiders (Araneae, Orbiculariae: Deinopoidea, Araneoidea). Zool J Linn Soc Lond 123:1–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hayashi CY, Blackledge TA, Lewis RV (2004) Molecular and mechanical characterization of aciniform silk: uniformity of iterated sequence modules in a novel member of the spider silk fibroin gene family. Mol Biol Evol 21:1950–1959CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Herberstein ME (2000) Foraging behaviour in orb-web spiders (Araneidae): do web decorations increase prey capture success in Argiope keyserlingi Karsch, 1878? Austral J Zool 48:217–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Herberstein ME, Craig CL, Coddington JA, Elgar MA (2000) The functional significance of silk decorations of orb-web spiders: a critical review of the empirical evidence. Biol Rev 75:649–669CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Joseph MM, Framenau VW (2012) Systematic review of a new orb-weaving spider genus (Araneae: Araneidae), with special reference to the Australasian-Pacific and South-East Asian fauna. Zool J Linn Soc Lond 166:279–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kerr AM (1993) Low frequency of stabilimenta in orb webs of Argiope appensa (Araneae: Araneidae) from Guam: An indirect effect of an introduced avian predator? Pac Sci 47:328–337Google Scholar
  24. McCook HC (1889) American spiders and their spinning work, vol 1. Academy of Natural Sciences, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  25. Müller MC, Westheide W (1993) Comparative morphology of the sexually dimorphic orb-weaving spider Argiope bruennichi (Araneae: Araneidae). Mem Queensl Mus 33:615–620Google Scholar
  26. Nakata K (2009) To be or not to be conspicuous: the effects of prey availability and predator risk on spider’s web decoration building. Anim Behav 78:1255–1260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Olive CW (1980) Foraging specializations in orb-weaving spiders. Ecology 61:1133–1144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Olive CW (1981) Optimal phenology and body-size of orb-weaving spiders: foraging constraints. Oecologia 49:83–87CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Peters HM (1993) Über das problem der stabilimente in spinnennetzen. Zool Jahrb Allg Zool 97:245–264Google Scholar
  30. Robinson MH, Olazarri J (1971) Units of behavior and complex sequences in the predatory behavior of Argiope argentata (Fabricius): (Araneae: Araneidae). Smithson Contr Zool 65:1–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Robinson MH, Mirick H, Turner O (1969) The predatory behaviour of some araneid spiders and the origin of immobilization wrapping. Psyche 76:487–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schaedelin FC, Taborsky M (2009) Extended phenotypes as signals. Biol Rev 84:293–313CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Scharff N, Coddington JA (1997) A phylogenetic analysis of the orb-weaving spider family Araneidae (Arachnida, Araneae). Zool J Linn Soc 120:355–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schoener TW, Spiller DA (1992) Stabilimenta characteristics of the spider Argiope argentata on small islands: support of the predator-defense hypothesis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 31:309–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Seah WK, Li D (2001) Stabilimenta attract unwelcome predators to orb-webs. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:1553–1558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Starks PT (2002) The adaptive significance of stabilimenta in orb-webs: a hierarchical approach. Ann Zool Fennici 39:307–315Google Scholar
  37. Tan EJ, Seah SWH, Yap L-MYL, Goh PM, Gan W, Liu F, Li D (2010) Why do orb-weaving spiders (Cyclosa ginnaga) decorate their webs with silk spirals and plant detritus? Anim Behav 79:179–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tso I-M (1998) Isolated spider web stabilimentum attracts insects. Behaviour 135:311–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tso I-M (2004) The effect of food and silk reserve manipulation on decoration building of Argiope aetheroides. Behaviour 141:603–616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Vollrath F, Knight DP (2001) Liquid crystalline spinning of spider silk. Nature 410:541–548CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Walter A, Elgar MA (2012) The evolution of novel animal signals: silk decorations as a model system. Biol Rev 87:686–700CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Walter A, Elgar MA (2016) Signal polymorphism under a constant environment: the odd cross in a web decorating spider. Sci Nat 103:93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Walter A, Elgar MA, Bliss P, Moritz RFA (2008) ‘Wrap attack’ activates web decorating behavior in Argiope spiders. Behav Ecol 19:799–804CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiomedicineAarhus UniversityAarhus CDenmark
  2. 2.School of BioSciencesUniversity of MelbourneVictoriaAustralia

Personalised recommendations