Advertisement

Evolutionary Ecology

, Volume 31, Issue 1, pp 131–141 | Cite as

Evolution of avian breeding strategies and its relation to the habitat preferences of Mesozoic birds

  • Gerald Mayr
Ideas & Perspectives

Abstract

Birds are the only extant tetrapods, which incubate their eggs with body heat in nests outside of soil. Nesting free of sediment is now considered to have evolved comparatively late in avian evolution, within Ornithuromorpha, the clade including modern birds. Egg turning by the breeding adults was identified as an evolutionary corollary of this derived reproductive behavior and is due to a higher albumen content of the egg. An associated increase of egg width in the ornithuromorph subclade Ornithurae is reflected by opening of the pubic symphysis. Here it is hypothesized that the lower yolk to albumen ratio led to a reduced hatchling precocity and that different habitat preferences of Mesozoic birds account for the evolution of the derived avian reproductive biology in Ornithuromorpha. Unlike their sister taxon, the predominantly arboreal Enantiornithes, early ornithuromorphs were aquatic or terrestrial animals. After egg deposition in the ground was abandoned, early ornithuromorphs probably still nested on the ground, and in this case increased parental care is more likely to evolve in taxa that also forage on ground level. In Enantiornithines, by contrast, the evolution of increased post-hatching parental care was impeded by the fact that the “superprecocial” chicks hatched on the ground and entered arboreal habitats soon thereafter. If an increased post-hatching parental care was among the selective drivers of ornithuromorph breeding biology, offspring predation may have been a critical factor in the evolution of Cretaceous birds.

Keywords

Enantiornithes Ornithuromorpha Nesting Reproductive biology Precocity 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I thank Min Wang for photos of the pelves of Piscivoravis and Parabohaiornis. Comments by the reviewers, Andrzej Elzanowski and Charles Deeming, improved the manuscript.

References

  1. Bell A, Chiappe LM (2011) Statistical approach for inferring ecology of Mesozoic birds. J Syst Palaeontol 9:119–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Campbell B, Lack E (1985) A dictionary of birds. Poyser, CaltonGoogle Scholar
  3. Chiappe LM (2007) Glorified dinosaurs: the origin and early evolution of birds. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  4. Chinsamy A, Elzanowski A (2001) Bone histology: evolution of growth pattern in birds. Nature 412:402–403CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Clarke JA (2004) Morphology, phylogenetic taxonomy, and systematics of Ichthyornis and Apatornis (Avialae: Ornithurae). Bull Am Mus Nat Hist 286:1–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Colbourne R (2002) Incubation behaviour and egg physiology of kiwi (Apteryx spp.) in natural habitats. N Z J Ecol 26:129–138Google Scholar
  7. Deeming DC (1991) Reasons for the dichtomy in egg-turning in birds and reptiles. In: Deeming DC, Ferguson MWJ (eds) Egg incubation: its effects on embryonic development in birds and reptiles. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 307–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Deeming DC (2002) Importance and evolution of incubation in avian reproduction. In: Deeming DC (ed) Avian incubation: behaviour, environment, and evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 1–7Google Scholar
  9. Deeming DC (2007) Allometry of mass and composition in bird eggs: effects of phylogeny and hatchling maturity. Avian Poult Biol Rev 18:71–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Deeming DC (2015) The fossil record and evolution of avian egg nesting and incubation. In: Deeming DC, Reynolds SJ (eds) Nests, eggs, and incubation: new ideas about avian reproduction. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 8–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Deeming DC, Ruta M (2014) Egg shape changes at the theropod-bird transition, and a morphometric study of amniote eggs. R Soc Open Sci 1:140311CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Dekker RWRJ, Brom TG (1992) Megapode phylogeny and the interpretation of incubation strategies. Zool Verh 278:19–31Google Scholar
  13. Dyke GJ, Kaiser GW (2010) Cracking a developmental constraint: egg size and bird evolution. Rec Aust Mus 62:207–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Elliott A (1994) Family Megapodiidae (megapodes). In: del Hoyo J, Elliott A, Sargatal J (eds) Handbook of the birds of the world. New world vultures to guineafowl, vol 2. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona, pp 278–309Google Scholar
  15. Elzanowski A (1981) Embryonic bird skeletons from the Late Cretaceous of Mongolia. Palaeontol Pol 42:147–176Google Scholar
  16. Elzanowski A (1985) The evolution of parental care in birds with reference to fossil embryos. In: Ilyichev VD, Gavrilov VM (eds) Acta XVIII Congressus Internationalis Ornithologici, vol 1. Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Moscow, pp 178–183Google Scholar
  17. Fernández MS, García RA, Fiorelli L, Scolaro A, Salvador RB, Cotaro CN, Kaiser GW, Dyke GJ (2013) A large accumulation of avian eggs from the Late Cretaceous of Patagonia (Argentina) reveals a novel nesting strategy in Mesozoic birds. PLoS One 8:e61030CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Folch A (1992) Family Apterygidae (kiwis). In: del Hoyo J, Elliott A, Sargatal J (eds) Handbook of the birds of the world. Ostrich–ducks, vol 1. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona, pp 104–110Google Scholar
  19. Hansell M (2000) Bird nests and construction behaviour. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hu H, Zhou Z-H, O’Connor JK (2014) A subadult specimen of Pengornis and character evolution in Enantiornithes. Vertebr Palasiat 52:77–97Google Scholar
  21. Jones TD, Geist NR (2012) Reproductive biology of dinosaurs. In: Brett-Surman MK, Farlow JO, Holtz TR Jr (eds) The complete dinosaur, 2nd edn. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, pp 603–612Google Scholar
  22. Longrich NR, Tokaryk T, Field DJ (2011) Mass extinction of birds at the Cretaceous–Paleogene (K–Pg) boundary. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108:15253–15257CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Mayr G (2016) Avian evolution: the fossil record of birds and its paleobiological significance. Wiley, ChichesterCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Moore JR, Varricchio DJ (2016) The evolution of diapsid reproductive strategy with inferences about extinct taxa. PLoS One 11:e0158496CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Norell MA, Clark JM, Chiappe LM, Dashzeveg D (1995) A nesting dinosaur. Nature 378:774–776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. O’Connor JK, Chiappe LM, Bell A (2011) Pre-modern birds: avian divergences in the Mesozoic. In: Dyke G, Kaiser G (eds) Living dinosaurs. The evolutionary history of modern birds. Wiley, Chichester, pp 39–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sato T, Cheng Y-N, Wu X-C, Zelenitsky DK, Hsiao Y-F (2005) A pair of shelled eggs inside a female dinosaur. Science 308:375CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Sotherland PR, Rahn H (1987) On the composition of bird eggs. Condor 89:48–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Starck JM, Ricklefs RE (1998) Patterns of development: the altricial–precocial spectrum. In: Starck JM, Ricklefs RE (eds) Avian growth and development. Evolution within the altricial–precocial spectrum. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 3–30Google Scholar
  30. Stephan B (1987) Urvögel: Archaeopterygiformes. A. Ziemsen, WittenbergGoogle Scholar
  31. Tanaka K, Zelenitsky DK, Therrien F (2015) Eggshell porosity provides insight on evolution of nesting in dinosaurs. PLoS One 10:e0142829CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Varricchio DJ, Barta DE (2015) Revisiting Sabath’s “Larger Avian Eggs” from the Gobi Cretaceous. Acta Palaeontol Polon 60:11–25Google Scholar
  33. Varricchio DJ, Jackson F (2004) Two eggs sunny-side up: reproductive physiology in the dinosaur Troodon formosus. In: Currie PJ, Koppelhus EB, Shugar MA, Wright JL (eds) Feathered dragons: studies on the transition from dinosaurs to birds. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, pp 215–233Google Scholar
  34. Varricchio DJ, Jackson FD (2016) Reproduction in Mesozoic birds and evolution of modern avian reproductive mode. Auk 133:654–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wang M, Lloyd GT (2016) Rates of morphological evolution are heterogeneous in Early Cretaceous birds. Proc R Soc B 283:20160214CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Wang M, Zhou Z, Zhou S (2016) A new basal ornithuromorph bird (Aves: Ornithothoraces) from the Early Cretaceous of China with implication for morphology of early Ornithuromorpha. Zool J Linn Soc 176:207–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wellnhofer P (2009) Archaeopteryx. The icon of evolution. Friedrich Pfeil, MünchenGoogle Scholar
  38. Wesołowski T (1994) On the origin of parental care and the early evolution of male and female parental roles in birds. Am Nat 143:39–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wesołowski T (2004) The origin of parental care in birds: a reassessment. Behav Ecol 15:520–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Xing L, McKellar RC, Wang M, Bai M, O’Connor JK, Benton MJ, Zhang J, Wang Y, Tseng K, Lockley MG, Li G, Zhang W, Li G (2016) Mummified precocial bird wings in mid-Cretaceous Burmese amber. Nat Commun 7:12089CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Xu X, Zhou Z, Dudley R, Mackem S, Chuong CM, Erickson GM, Varricchio DJ (2014) An integrative approach to understanding bird origins. Science 346:1253293CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Zelenitsky DK (2006) Reproductive traits of non-avian theropods. J Paleontol Soc Korea 22:209–216Google Scholar
  43. Zhou Z, Zhang F (2004) A precocial avian embryo from the Lower Cretaceous of China. Science 306:653CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Zhou Z, Zhang F (2005) Discovery of an ornithurine bird and its implication for Early Cretaceous avian radiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci 102:18998–19002CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ornithological SectionSenckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum FrankfurtFrankfurt am MainGermany

Personalised recommendations