Pollinator-driven selection is thought to drive much of the extraordinary diversity of flowering plants. Plants that produce floral traits preferred by particular pollinators are more likely to receive conspecific pollen and to evolve further adaptations to those pollinators that enhance pollination and ultimately generate floral diversity. Two mechanisms in particular, sensory bias and learning, are thought to explain how pollinator preference can contribute to divergence and speciation in flowering plants. While the preferences of pollinators, such as bees, flies, and birds, are frequently implicated in patterns of floral trait evolution, the role of learning in generating reproductive isolation and trait divergence for different floral types within plant populations is not well understood. Floral color polymorphism in particular provides an excellent opportunity to examine how pollinator behavior and learning might maintain the different floral morphs. In this study we asked if bumble bees showed innate preferences for different color morphs of the pollen-only plant Solanum tridynamum, whether bees formed preferences for the morphs with which they had experience collecting pollen from, and the strength of those learned preferences. Using an absolute conditioning protocol, we gave bees experience collecting pollen from a color polymorphic plant species that offered only pollen rewards. Despite initially-naïve bees showing no apparent innate bias toward human-white versus human-purple flower morphs, we did find evidence of a bias in learning. Specifically, bees learned strong preferences for purple corollas, but learned only weak preferences for hypochromic (human-white) corollas. We discuss how our results might explain patterns of floral display evolution, particularly as they relate to color polymorphisms. Additionally, we propose that the ease with which floral visual traits are learned—i.e., biases in learning—can influence the evolution of floral color as a signal to pollinators.
Bumble bee Pollen reward Learning Color polymorphism Biases in learning Preference
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
We are grateful to Carla Essenberg, Madhu Viswanathan, Matthew Forister, and Kenneth Train for aid with statistical analyses, to Abreeza Zegeer for greenhouse care, to John Wiens from the Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum for plants, and to Sarah White for assistance in running experimental trials.
This work was supported by a University of Arizona Honors College Undergraduate Research Grant, as well as funding from the Graduate and Professional Student Council, and the National Science Foundation (IOS-1257762 to A.S. Leonard, S.L. Buchmann, and D.R. Papaj).
Bradshaw HD, Schemske DW (2003) Allele substitution at a flower color locus produces a pollinator shift in monkeyflowers. Nature 426:176–178CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Briscoe Runquist RD, Moeller DA (2014) Floral and mating system divergence in secondary sympatry: testing an alternative hypothesis to reinforcement in Clarkia. Ann Bot 113:223–235CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Hurly TA, Healy SD (2002) Cue learning by rufous hummingbirds (Selasphorus rufus). J Exp Psychol 28:209–223Google Scholar
Johnson SD (2006) Pollinator-driven speciation in plants. In: Harder LD, Barrett SCH (eds) The ecology and evolution of flowers. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 295–310Google Scholar
Kandori I (2002) Diverse visitors with various pollinator importance and temporal change in the important pollinators of Geranium thunbergii (Geraniaceae). Ecol Res 17:283–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelber A, Pfaff M (1997) Spontaneous and learned preferences for visual flower features in a diurnal hawkmoth. Isr J Plant Sci 45:235–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonard AS, Papaj DR (2011) ‘X’ marks the spot: the possible benefits of nectar guides to bees and plants. Funct Ecol 25:1293–1301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lunau K (1991) Innate flower recognition in bumblebees (Bombus terrestris, B. lucorum; Apidae): optical signals from stamens as landing reaction releasers. Ethology 88:203–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lunau K (1992) Limits of colour learning in a flower-visiting hoverfly, Eristalis tenax L. (Syrphidae, Diptera). Eur J Neurosci Suppl 5:103Google Scholar
Lunau K, Maier EJ (1995) Innate colour preferences of flower visitors. J Comp Physiol A 177:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lunau K, Wacht S, Chittka L (1996) Colour choices of naïve bumble bees and their implications for colour perception. J Comp Physiol A 178:477–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malerba R, Nattero J (2012) Pollinator response to flower color polymorphism and floral display in a plant with a single-locus floral color polymorphism: consequences for plant reduction. Ecol Res 27:377–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar