The potential for disruptive selection on growth rates across genetically influenced alternative reproductive tactics
- 266 Downloads
A trade-off between survival to sexual maturity and mating success is common across alternative reproductive tactics (ARTs), and can lead to tactical disruptive selection on shared traits (i.e. positive selection gradient in one tactic, and negative selection gradient in another). We were interested in examining the theoretical possibility of tactical disruptive selection on intrinsic growth rate. The male ARTs in Xiphophorus multilineatus express two distinct life histories: “courters” optimize mating success by maturing later at larger size and coaxing females to mate, while “sneakers” optimize survival to sexual maturity by maturing earlier at a smaller size, using both coaxing and coercive mating behaviors. In addition to differences in mating behaviors, body length, body depth, and the pigment pattern vertical bars, courter males grow faster than sneaker males. We present a new hypothesis for differences in growth rates between genetically influenced ARTs. The “growth-maturity optimization” hypothesis suggests that ARTs with differences in the probability of surviving to sexual maturity may have different optimal growth rates, leading to tactical disruptive selection. We also present a simple model to suggest that when considering both a cost and benefit to faster growth, tactical disruptive selection on growth rates is theoretically possible. In our model, the value that determines when tactical disruptive selection on growth rate will occur is the increase in probability of survival to sexual maturity gained through faster growth multiplied by the cost of faster growth (reduced longevity). Finally, we present empirical evidence to support the prediction that faster growth has a cost in X. multilineatus: in a controlled laboratory setting, courter males that did not survive 1.2 years past sexual maturity grew faster as juveniles (14–70 days) than those that survived.
KeywordsAlternative reproductive tactics Melanincortin-4 receptor gene Mortality growth trade-off “Growth-maturity optimization” hypothesis Tactical disruptive selection Xiphophorus
We thank A. Murphy for rearing the fish tested in the environmental chambers, and D. D’Amore and I. Ligocki for helpful comments on the manuscript. This research was supported by a grant from Swedish Foundation for International Cooperation in Research and Higher Education.
Compliance with ethical standards
All applicable institutional and/or national guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.
- Gross MR (1982) Sneakers, satellites and parentals: polymorphic mating strategies in North American sunfishes. Ethology 60:1–26Google Scholar
- Gross MR (1984) Sunfish, salmon and the evolution of alternative reproductive strategies and tactics in fish. In: Wooton RJ, Potts GW (eds) Fish reproduction: Strategies and Tactics. Academic Press, London, pp 55–75Google Scholar
- Kallman KD (1989) Genetic control of size at maturity in Xiphophorus. In: Meffe GK, Snelson FF (eds) Ecology and evolution of livebearing fishes (Poeciliidae). Prentice Hall, New Jersey, pp 163–184Google Scholar
- Lee WS, Monaghan P, Metcalfe NB (2013) Experimental demonstration of the growth rate–lifespan trade-off. Proc R Soc B 280:2012–2370Google Scholar
- Leonardsson K, Lundberg P (1986) The choice of reproductive tactics as a mixed evolutionarily stable strategy: the case of male Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) Report—Inst. Freshwater Res. Drottningholm 63:69–76Google Scholar
- Mangel M, Stamps J (2001) Trade-offs between growth and mortality and the maintenance of individual variation in growth. Evol Ecol Res 3:583–593Google Scholar
- Morris MR, Goedert D, Abbott JK, Robinson DM, Rios-Cardenas O (2013) Intralocus tactical conflict and the evolution of alternative reproductive tactics. In: Brockmann JH, Roper TJ, Naguib M, Mitani JC, Simmons LW, Barrett L (eds) Advances in the study of behavior, 45. Academic Press, London, pp 447–478Google Scholar
- Rios-Cardenas O, Morris MR (2011) Precopulatory sexual selection. In: Evans JP, Pilastro A, Schulpp I (eds) Ecology and evolution of poeciliid Fishes. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 187–196Google Scholar
- Shuster SM, Wade MJ (2003) Mating systems and strategies. Princeton University Press, USAGoogle Scholar