Advertisement

Evolutionary Ecology

, Volume 30, Issue 2, pp 267–283 | Cite as

Negative niche construction favors the evolution of cooperation

  • Brian D. Connelly
  • Katherine J. Dickinson
  • Sarah P. Hammarlund
  • Benjamin KerrEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

By benefitting others at a cost to themselves, cooperators face an ever present threat from defectors—individuals that avail themselves of the cooperative benefit without contributing. A longstanding challenge to evolutionary biology is to understand the mechanisms that support the many instances of cooperation that nevertheless exist. In spatially-structured environments, clustered cooperator populations reach greater densities, which creates more mutational opportunities to gain beneficial non-social adaptations. Hammarlund et al. recently demonstrated that cooperation rises in abundance by hitchhiking with these non-social mutations. However, once adaptive opportunities have been exhausted, the ride abruptly ends as cooperators are displaced by adapted defectors. Using an agent-based model, we demonstrate that the selective feedback that is created as populations construct their local niches can maintain cooperation at high proportions and even allow cooperators to invade. This cooperator success depends specifically on negative niche construction, which acts as a perpetual source of adaptive opportunities. As populations adapt, they alter their environment in ways that reveal additional opportunities for adaptation. Despite being independent of niche construction in our model, cooperation feeds this cycle. By reaching larger densities, populations of cooperators are better able to adapt to changes in their constructed niche and successfully respond to the constant threat posed by defectors. We relate these findings to previous studies from the niche construction literature and discuss how this model could be extended to provide a greater understanding of how cooperation evolves in the complex environments in which it is found.

Keywords

Adaptation Cooperation Genetic hitchhiking Niche construction 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Peter Conlin, Sylvie Estrela, Carrie Glenney, Martha Kornelius, and Luis Zaman for helpful comments on the manuscript, and to Anuraag Pakanati for assistance with simulations. BK thanks Kevin Laland, Marc Feldman, John Odling-Smee, Lucy Odling-Smee, and Doug Irwin for the invitation to participate in the Frontiers in Niche Construction meeting at SFI. This material is based upon research supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant DBI-1309318 (Postdoctoral Research Fellowship in Biology to BDC), Cooperative Agreement DBI-0939454 (BEACON STC), and Grant DEB-0952825 (CAREER Award to BK). Computational resources were provided by an award from Google Inc. (to BDC and BK).

Supplementary material

10682_2015_9803_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (4.6 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (pdf 4753 KB)

References

  1. Allison SD (2005) Cheaters, diffusion and nutrients constrain decomposition by microbial enzymes in spatially structured environments. Ecol Lett 8:626–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Asfahl KL, Walsh J, Gilbert K, Schuster M (2015) Non-social adaptation defers a tragedy of the commons in Pseudomonas aeruginosa quorum sensing. ISME J. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2014.259 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bernier SP, Ha D-G, Khan W, Merritt JHM, O’Toole GA (2011) Modulation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa surface-associated group behaviors by individual amino acids through c-di-GMP signaling. Res Microbiol 162:680–688CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown SP, Johnstone RA (2001) Cooperation in the dark: signalling and collective action in quorum-sensing bacteria. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 268:961–965CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown SP, Taddei F (2007) The durability of public goods changes the dynamics and nature of social dilemmas. PLoS ONE 2:e593CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Connelly BD, Dickinson KJ, Hammarlund SP, Kerr B (2015) Model, data, and analysis for Negative niche construction favors the evolution of cooperation. Zenodo. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.31838 Google Scholar
  7. Cosson P, Zulianello L, Join-Lambert O, Faurisson F, Gebbie L, Benghezal M et al (2002) Pseudomonas aeruginosa virulence analyzed in a Dictyostelium discoideum host system. J Bacteriol 184:3027–3033CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Dandekar AA, Chugani S, Greenberg EP (2012) Bacterial quorum sensing and metabolic incentives to cooperate. Science 338:264–266CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Darch SE, West SA, Winzer K, Diggle SP (2012) Density-dependent fitness benefits in quorum-sensing bacterial populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109:8259–8263CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Diggle SP, Griffin AS, Campbell GS, West SA (2007) Cooperation and conflict in quorum-sensing bacterial populations. Nature 450:411–414CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Driscoll WW, Pepper JW (2010) Theory for the evolution of diffusible external goods. Evolution 64:2682–2687CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Dumas Z, Kümmerli R (2012) Cost of cooperation rules selection for cheats in bacterial metapopulations. J Evol Biol 25:473–484CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Fletcher JA, Doebeli M (2009) A simple and general explanation for the evolution of altruism. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 276:13–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Foster K, Shaulsky G, Strassmann J, Queller D, Thompson C (2004) Pleiotropy as a mechanism to stabilize cooperation. Nature 431:693–696CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Gardner A, West SA (2010) Greenbeards. Evolution 64:25–38CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Ghoul M, West SA, Diggle SP, Griffin AS (2014) An experimental test of whether cheating is context dependent. J Evol Biol 27:551–556CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Griffin AS, West SA, Buckling A (2004) Cooperation and competition in pathogenic bacteria. Nature 430:1024–1027CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Hafer N, Milinski M (2015) When parasites disagree: evidence for parasite-induced sabotage of host manipulation. Evolution 69:611–620CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Hagberg AA, Schult DA, Swart PJ (2008) Exploring network structure, dynamics, and function using NetworkX. In: Proceedings of the 7th Python in science conference (SciPy2008), pp 11–15Google Scholar
  20. Hamblin SR, White PA, Tanaka MM (2014) Viral niche construction alters hosts and ecosystems at multiple scales. Trends Ecol Evol 29:594–599CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Hamilton WD (1964) The genetical evolution of social behaviour I & II. J Theor Biol 7:1–52CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Hammarlund SP, Connelly BD, Dickinson KJ, Kerr B (2015) The evolution of cooperation by the Hankshaw effect. bioRxiv. doi: 10.1101/016667
  23. Harrison F (2007) Microbial ecology of the cystic fibrosis lung. Microbiology 153:917–923CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Hartfield M, Otto SP (2011) Recombination and hitchhiking of deleterious alleles. Evolution 65:2421–2434CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Kerr B, Godfrey-Smith P, Feldman MW (2004) What is altruism? Trends Ecol Evol 19:135–140CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Koestler BJ, Waters CM (2014) Bile acids and bicarbonate inversely regulate intracellular cyclic di-GMP in Vibrio cholerae. Infect Immun 82:3002–3014CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Kümmerli R, Brown SP (2010) Molecular and regulatory properties of a public good shape the evolution of cooperation. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107:18921–18926CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Kuzdzal-Fick JJ, Fox SA, Strassmann JE, Queller DC (2011) High relatedness is necessary and sufficient to maintain multicellularity in Dictyostelium. Science 334:1548–1551CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Laland KN, Odling-Smee FJ, Feldman MW (1996) The evolutionary consequences of niche construction: a theoretical investigation using two-locus theory. J Evol Biol 9:293–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Laland KN, Odling-Smee FJ, Feldman MW (1999) Evolutionary consequences of niche construction and their implications for ecology. Proc Natl Acad Sci 96:10242–10247CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Lehmann L (2007) The evolution of trans-generational altruism: kin selection meets niche construction. J Evol Biol 20:181–189CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. McKinney W (2010) Data structures for statistical computing in Python. In: van der Walt S, Millman J (eds) Proceedings of the 9th Python in science conference, pp 51–56Google Scholar
  33. Morgan AD, Quigley BJZ, Brown SP, Buckling A (2012) Selection on non-social traits limits the invasion of social cheats. Ecol Lett 15:841–846CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Nadell CD, Foster KR, Xavier JB (2010) Emergence of spatial structure in cell groups and the evolution of cooperation. PLoS Comput Biol 6:e1000716CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Nowak MA (2006) Five rules for the evolution of cooperation. Science 314:1560–1563CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Odling-Smee FJ, Laland KN, Feldman MW (2003) Niche construction: the neglected process in evolution. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  37. R Core Team (2015) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, AustriaGoogle Scholar
  38. Santos M, Szathmáry E (2008) Genetic hitchhiking can promote the initial spread of strong altruism. BMC Evol Biol 8:281CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Schwilk DW, Kerr B (2002) Genetic niche-hiking: an alternative explanation for the evolution of flammability. Oikos 99:431–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sinervo B, Chaine A, Clobert J, Calsbeek R, Hazard L, Lancaster L et al (2006) Self-recognition, color signals, and cycles of greenbeard mutualism and altruism. Proc Natl Acad Sci 103:7372–7377CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Van Dyken JD, Wade MJ (2012) Origins of altruism diversity II: runaway coevolution of altruistic strategies via “reciprocal niche construction”. Evolution 66:2498–2513CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Veelders M, Brückner S, Ott D, Unverzagt C, Mösch H-U, Essen L-O (2010) Structural basis of flocculin-mediated social behavior in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107:22511–22516CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Waite AJ, Shou W (2012) Adaptation to a new environment allows cooperators to purge cheaters stochastically. Proc Nat Acad Sci 109:19079–19086CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. West SA, Diggle SP, Buckling A, Gardner A, Griffin AS (2007a) The social lives of microbes. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 38:53–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. West SA, Griffin AS, Gardner A (2007b) Evolutionary explanations for cooperation. Curr Biol 17:R661–R672CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Wilder B, Stanley KO (2015) Altruists proliferate even at a selective disadvantage within their own niche. PLoS ONE 10:e0128654CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Zhang X-X, Rainey PB (2013) Exploring the sociobiology of pyoverdin-producing Pseudomonas. Evolution 67:3161–3174CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brian D. Connelly
    • 1
  • Katherine J. Dickinson
    • 1
  • Sarah P. Hammarlund
    • 1
    • 2
  • Benjamin Kerr
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Biology and BEACON Center for the Study of Evolution in ActionUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA
  2. 2.Department of ZoologyUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations