Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Intraspecific variation in clutch size and maternal investment in pueriparous and larviparous Salamandra salamandra females

Evolutionary Ecology volume 29, pages 185–204 (2015)Cite this article

Abstract

Amphibian reproductive modes are diverse and are characterised by complex adaptations, including vast variability in life history traits and different parental investment strategies. For instance, viviparity is rare in urodeles despite the potential ecological advantages gained in such populations by having semi-independency from water. The fire salamander, Salamandra salamandra, shows remarkable intraspecific variation in reproductive modes, with two strategies co-occurring: a common reproductive mode, larviparity (parturition of aquatic larvae), and a phylogenetically derived reproductive mode, pueriparity (parturition of terrestrial juveniles). Pueriparous populations of S. salamandra have at least two independent origins, the first originating from its northern distribution in the Iberian Peninsula, and the second at two insular populations on the northwestern Iberian coast. Here, we analyse the patterns of variability of some life-history traits in larviparous and pueriparous populations of S. salamandra, including pueriparous populations from the two independent origins, to understand how these traits relate to the evolutionary transitions in reproductive modes in S. salamandra. Our study shows differences in female body size and clutch and brood size between larviparous and pueriparous fire salamanders. We did not find differences in female investment between reproductive modes, and thus, the evolution to pueriparity in S. salamandra is likely characterised by the re-allocation of eggs to matrotrophy. Our study also confirms pueriparity and larviparity as the characteristic reproductive modes for insular and coastal/mainland S. s. gallaica populations, respectively, revealing the potential presence of pueriparity in one coastal population. This comparative analysis sheds light on the maternal factors that might have driven, or are related to, the evolution of pueriparity in this unique biological system and sets up the basis for testing different hypotheses that include climatic, ecological, physiological, and genetic factors as drivers of this evolutionary transition.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  • Alcobendas M, Castanet J (2000) Bone growth plasticity among populations of Salamandra salamandra: interactions between internal and external factors. Herpetologica 56:14–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Alcobendas M, Dopazo H, Alberch P (1996) Geographic variation in allozymes of populations of Salamandra salamandra (Amphibia: Urodela) exhibiting distinct reproductive modes. J Evol Biol 9:83–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alcobendas M, Buckley D, Tejedo M (2004) Variability in survival, growth and metamorphosis in the larval fire salamander (Salamandra salamandra): effects of larval birth size, sibship and environment. Herpetologica 60:232–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • AmphibiaWeb (2014) Information on amphibian biology and conservation. Berkeley, CA. http://amphibiaweb.org. Accessed 22 Jan 2014

  • Beukema W, de Pous P, Donaire D et al (2010) Biogeography and contemporary climatic differentiation among Moroccan Salamandra algira. Biol J Linn Soc 101:626–641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn DG (2000) Reptilian viviparity: past research, future directions, and appropriate models. Comp Biochem Phys A Mol Int Phys 127:391–409

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn DG (2014) Evolution of vertebrate viviparity and specializations for fetal nutrition: a quantitative and qualitative analysis. J Morphol. doi:10.1002/jmor.20272

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bleu J, Heulin B, Haussy C, Meylan S, Massot M (2012) Experimental evidence of early costs o reproduction in conspecific viviparous and oviparous lizards. J Evol Biol 25:1264–1274

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley D (2003) La evolución del viviparismo en Salamandra salamandra (Linnaeus, 1758). PhD Dissertation. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Spain

  • Buckley D (2012) Evolution of viviparity in salamanders (Amphibia, Caudata). In: eLS. Wiley, Chichester. doi:10.1002/9780470015902.a0022851

  • Buckley D, Alcobendas M, García-París M, Wake MH (2007) Heterochrony, cannibalism, and the evolution of viviparity in Salamandra salamandra. Evol Dev 9:105–115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Caley MJ, Schwarzkopf L, Shine R (2001) Does total reproductive effort evolve independently of offspring size? Evolution 55:1245–1248

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock TH (2001) The evolution of parental care. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Cordero Rivera A, Velo-Antón G, Galán P (2007) Ecology of amphibians in small coastal Holocene islands: local adaptations and the effect of exotic tree plantations. Munibe 25:94–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham EJ (2002) Aves (birds). In: eLS. Wiley, Chichester. doi:10.1038/npg.els.0001548

  • Dias JMA, Boski T, Rodrigues A et al (2000) Coast line evolution in Portugal since the last glacial maximum until present: a synthesis. Mar Geol 170:177–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dopazo HJ, Alberch P (1994) Preliminary results on optional viviparity and intrauterine siblicide in Salamandra salamandra populations from northern Spain. Mertensiella 4:125–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Dopazo HJ, Korenblum M (2000) Viviparity in Salamandra salamandra (Amphibia: Salamandridae): adaptation or exaptation? Herpetologica 56:144–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Galán P (2007) Viviparismo y distribución de Salamandra salamandra bernardezi en el norte de Galicia. Bol Asoc Esp Herp 18:44–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Galán P, Velo-Antón G, Cordero Rivera A (2011) Puesta de huevos infecundos en Salamandra salamandra. Bol Asoc Esp Herp 22:1–3

    Google Scholar 

  • García-París M, Alcobendas M, Buckley D, Wake DB (2003) Dispersal of viviparity across contact zones in Iberian populations of fire salamanders (Salamandra) inferred from discordance of genetic and morphological traits. Evolution 57:129–143

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez-Mestre I, Pyron RA, Wiens JJ (2012) Phylogenetic analyses reveal unexpected patterns in the evolution of reproductive modes in frogs. Evolution 66:3687–3700

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin NB, Dulvy NK, Reynolds JD (2002) Life-history correlates of the evolution of live bearing in fishes. Philos Trans R Soc B 357:259–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gower D, Giri V, Dharne MS, Shouche YS (2008) Frequency of independent origins of viviparity among caecilians (Gymnophiona): evidence from the first ‘live-bearing’ Asian amphibian. J Evol Biol 21:1220–1226

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greven H (1998) Survey of the oviduct of salamandrids with special reference to the viviparous species. J Exp Zool 282:507–525

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greven H (2011) Maternal adaptations to reproductive modes in amphibians. In: Norris P, Lopez K (eds) Hormones and reproduction of vertebrates, volume 2, amphibians. Elsevier, USA, pp 117–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison RM (2001) Reproduction in mammals: general overview. In: eLS. Wiley, Chichester. doi:10.1038/npg.els.0001855

  • Heulin B, Osenegg K, Lebouvier M (1991) Timing of embryonic development and birth dates in oviparous and viviparous strains of Lacerta vivipara: testing the predictions of an evolutionary hypothesis. Acta Oecol 12:517–528

    Google Scholar 

  • Heulin B, Osenegg-Leconte K, Michel D (1997) Demography of a bimodal reproductive species of lizard (Lacerta vivipara): survival and density characteristics of oviparous populations. Herpetologica 53:432–444

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodges WL (2004) Evolution of viviparity in horned lizards (Phrynosoma): testing the cold-climate hypothesis. J Evol Biol 17:1230–1237

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson BGM (2009) Reproductive biology and phylogeny of fishes (agnathans and bony fishes). Science Publishers, Enfield, NH

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Janvier P (2001) Agnatha (lampreys, hagfishes, ostracoderms). In: eLS. Wiley, Chichester. doi:10.1038/npg.els.0001532

  • Joly J (1986) La réproduction de la salamandre terrestre (Salamandra salamandra L.). In: Grasse PP, Delsol M (eds) Traité de Zologie. Amphibiens, vol 14. Masson, Paris, pp 471–486

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan RH, Cooper WS (1984) The evolution of developmental plasticity in reproductive characteristics: an application of the ‘adaptive coin-flipping’ principle. Am Nat 123:393–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kopp M, Baur B (2000) Intra- and inter-litter variation in life-history traits in a population of fire salamanders (Salamandra salamandra terrestris). J Zool 25:231–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kupfer A, Müller H, Antoniazzi MM, Jared C, Greven H, Nussbaum RA, Wilkinson M (2006) Parental investment by skin feeding in a caecilian amphibian. Nature 440:926–929

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert SM, Wiens JJ (2013) Evolution of viviparity: a phylogenetic test of the cold-climate hypothesis in phrynosomatid lizards. Evolution 67:2614–2630

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lomolino MV (2005) Body size evolution in insular vertebrates: generality of the island rule. J Biogeogr 32:1683–1699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyron RA, Burbrink FT (2014) Early origin of viviparity and multiple reversions to oviparity in squamate reptiles. Ecol Lett 17:13–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Qualls CP, Shine R (1998) Costs of reproduction in conspecific oviparous and viviparous lizards, Lerista bouganvillii. Oikos 82:539–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rebelo R, Leclair MH (2003) Differences in size at birth and brood size among Portuguese populations of the fire salamander, Salamandra salamandra. Herpetol J 13:179–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Díaz T, Braña F (2012) Altitudinal variation in egg retention and rates of embryonic development in oviparous Zootoca vivipara fits predictions from the cold-climate model of the evolution of viviparity. J Evol Biol 25:1877–1887

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roitberg ES, Kuranova VN, Bulakhova NA, Orlova VF, Eplanova GV, Zinenko OI, Shamgunova RR, Hofmann S, Yakolev VA (2012) Variation of reproductive traits and female boy-size in the most widely-ranging terrestrial reptile: testing the effects of reproductive mode, lineage, and climate. Evol Biol 40:420–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salvador A, García-París M (2001) Anfibios Españoles. Identificación, historia Natural y Distribución. Canseco Editores, S. L, Talavera de la Reina, Spain

  • Semlitsch RD, Schmiedehausen S (1994) Parental contributions to variation in hatchling size and its relationship to growth and metamorphosis in tadpoles of Rana lessonae and Rana esculenta. Copeia 1994:406–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shine R (1985) The evolution of viviparity in reptiles: an ecological analysis. In: Gans C, Billet F (eds) Biology of the reptilia. Wiley, New York, pp 605–694

    Google Scholar 

  • Shine R (2014) Evolution of an evolutionary hypothesis: a history of changing ideas about the adaptive significance of viviparity in reptiles. J Herpetol 48:147–161

  • Statsoft Inc (2010) STATISTICA 10.0. Statsoft, Inc, Tulsa, OK

  • Stewart JR (2003) Fetal nutrition in lecitotrophic reptiles: toward a comprehensive model for evolution of viviparity and placentation. J Morphol 274:824–843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thiesmeier B, Haker K (1990) Salamandra salamandra bernardezi Wolterstorff 1928 aus Oviedo, Spanien, nebst Bermerkungen zu Viviparie in der Gattung Salamandra. Salamandra 26:140–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Travis J, Emerson SB, Blouin M (1987) A quantitative genetic analysis of larval life-history traits in Hyla crucifer. Evolution 41:45–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uotila U, Crespo-Díaz A, Sanz-Azkue et al (2013) Variation in the reproductive strategies of fire salamander populations in the province of Gipuzkoa (Basque Country). Munibe 61:91–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Veith M, Steinfartz S, Zardoya R et al (1998) A molecular phylogeny of ‘true’ salamanders (family Salamandridae) and the evolution of terrestriality of reproductive modes. J Zool Syst Evol Res 3:7–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Velo-Antón G (2008) Presencia de Salamandra salamandra en la isla de Tambo (Rías Bajas, Pontevedra). Bol Asoc Esp Herp 19:61–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Velo-Antón G, García-París M, Galán P et al (2007) The evolution of viviparity in Holocene islands: ecological adaptation versus phylogenetic descent along the transition from aquatic to terrestrial environments. J Zool Syst Evol Res 45:345–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Velo-Antón G, Zamudio KR, Cordero-Rivera A (2012) Genetic drift and rapid evolution of viviparity in insular fire salamanders (Salamandra salamandra). Heredity 108:410–418

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wade MJ, Shuster SM (2002) The evolution of parental care in the context o sexual selection: a critical reassessment of parental investment theory. Am Nat 160:285–292

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wake MH (2002) Viviparity and oviparity. In: Pagel MD (ed) Encyclopedia of evolution, vol 2. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 1141–1143

    Google Scholar 

  • Wake MH (2003) Reproductive modes, ontogenies, and the evolution of body forms. Anim Biol 53:209–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wake MH (2014) Fetal adaptations for viviparity in amphibians. J Morphol. doi:10.1002/jmor.20271

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wells KD (2007) The ecology and behavior of amphibians. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wourms JP (1981) Viviparity: the maternal–fetal relationship in fishes. Am Zool 21:473–515

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are deeply thankful to M. Casal Nantes for her generous help during field-work campaigns. We thank the employees of the National Park for facilitating our trips to the island. Fieldwork for obtaining tissue samples was done with the corresponding permits from regional administration (Galicia, Ref. 1653/2009, 014/2011, 546/2012). We also thank M. Modrell, the associated editor Martin Reichard and two anonymous reviewers for all their comments and suggestions, which have certainly improved the manuscript. G.V.-A. and X.S. are supported by Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (SFRH/BPD/74834/2010 and SFRH/BPD/73176/2010, respectively). D.B. was partially supported by a JAE-DOC fellowship from the CSIC under the program “Junta para la Ampliación de Estudios” co-financed by the European Social Fund (ESF). This study was partially supported by Grants from the Organismo Autónomo Parques Nacionales (Grant 072B/2002) and by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT: PTDC/BIA-EVF/3036/2012) through EU Programme COMPETE, and by project “Biodiversity, Ecology and Global Change” co-financed by North Portugal Regional Operational Programme 2007/2013 (ON.2—O Novo Norte), under the National Strategic Reference Framework (NSRF), through the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF). This research also received support from the SYNTHESYS Project http://www.synthesys.info/ which is financed by European Community Research Infrastructure Action under the FP7 “Capacities” Programme at the Museo Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (CSIC) (Ref: ES-TAF-1987).

Author information

Author notes

  1. David Buckley

    Present address: Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Anatomy Building, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3DY, UK

Authors and Affiliations

  1. CIBIO/InBIO, Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, Instituto de Ciências Agrárias de Vairão, Universidade do Porto, R. Padre Armando Quintas, 4485-661, Vairão, Portugal

    Guillermo Velo-Antón & Xavier Santos

  2. Grupo de Ecoloxía Evolutiva e da Conservación, Departamento de Ecoloxía e Bioloxía Animal, Universidade de Vigo, E.U.E.T. Forestal, Campus Universitario, 36005, Pontevedra, Spain

    Iago Sanmartín-Villar & Adolfo Cordero-Rivera

  3. Departamento de Biodiversidad y Biología Evolutiva, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, CSIC, Madrid, Spain

    David Buckley

Authors
  1. Guillermo Velo-Antón
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xavier Santos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Iago Sanmartín-Villar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Adolfo Cordero-Rivera
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. David Buckley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guillermo Velo-Antón.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 2.

Table 2 Subspecies, sampled populations, female codes, female body size and reproductive output (number of juveniles, larvae and eggs; and measurements of total length and weight [mean and standard deviations]) for each studied female
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Velo-Antón, G., Santos, X., Sanmartín-Villar, I. et al. Intraspecific variation in clutch size and maternal investment in pueriparous and larviparous Salamandra salamandra females. Evol Ecol 29, 185–204 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-014-9720-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-014-9720-0

Keywords

search

Navigation