Evolutionary Ecology

, Volume 28, Issue 1, pp 37–53 | Cite as

Variation in contact zone dynamics between two species of topminnows, Fundulus notatus and F. olivaceus, across isolated drainage systems

  • David D. DuvernellEmail author
  • Jacob F. Schaefer
Original Paper


Spatially variable selection pressure within heterogeneous environments can result in the evolution of specialist phenotypes that facilitate co-occurrence of closely related species and limit genetic exchange. If divergent selection pressures maintain reproductive isolation, hybridization is expected to correlate with the strength of underlying ecological gradients and the traits shaped by adaptive processes. We sampled ten replicate topminnow (Fundulus olivaceus and Fundulus notatus) hybrid zones in isolated drainages throughout central and southern North America. In all drainages, species were distributed in an upstream–downstream manner with contact zones localized at confluences featuring abrupt shifts from tributary to river habitat. In two drainages, the typical up and downstream positions of species were reversed. Phenotype differences between the species reflect predicted selection differences along stream gradients. Downstream populations (lower food availability and greater predator pressure) generally showed larger investment in reproduction (higher gonadal somatic index), smaller body size and lower somatic condition compared to upstream populations. Phenotypic differences between the species in the two reversed drainages were consistent with convergence of life history traits in the respective habitats. Phenotypes of individuals of hybrid origin (F1 hybrids or backcrosses) were not significantly different from the average of the two parental forms, though there were trends towards reduced fitness. The prevalence of hybridization among drainages ranged from no hybrids in two drainages to near random mating. The strongest correlates of hybridization rate among replicate hybrid zones were similarity in body shape and the homogeneity of habitat through tributary-river confluences. The two reversed orientation hybrid zones also exhibited high prevalence of hybrids suggesting that phenotypic convergence could lead to increased hybridization.


Hybrid zone Reproductive isolation Ecological gradient River continuum Convergence Fitness 



We thank B. Kreiser, C. Champagne, P. Mickle, S. Clark, B. Schmidt, M. Gutierrez, B. Knittel, J. Westerfield, K. Woods, J. Scott, P. Farrow, N. Green, M. Johns, J. Curry, D. McGinnie, M. Stasik, A. Stevenson, N. Anciulis, M. Hurt, A. Gafford, J. Einhorn, W. Vogel, M. Miller, P. Alldredge, B. Schoeneck, and M. Jablonski for assistance with field collections and laboratory work. Funding provided by the National Science Foundation (DEB # 0716985).


  1. Aboim MA, Mavárez J, Bernatchez L, Coelh MM (2010) Introgressive hybridization between two Iberian endemic cybrinid fish: a comparison between two independent hybrid zones. J Evol Biol 23:817–828PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alldredge P, Gutierrez M, Duvernell DD, Schaefer JF, Brunkow P, Matamoros W (2011) Variability in movement dynamics of topminnow (Fundulus notatus and F. olivaceus) populations. Ecol Fresh Fish 20:513–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson EC, Thompson EA (2002) A model-based method for identifying species hybrids using multilocus genetic data. Genetics 160:1217–1229PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Barton NH (1989) Adaptation, speciation and hybrid zones. Nature 341:497–503PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Belkhir K, Borsa P, Chikhi L, Raufaste N, Bonhomme F (2000) GENETIX 4.02, logiciel sous Windows TM pour la génétique des populations. Laboratoire génome, populations, interactions, CNRS UPR 9060, Université de Montpellier II, Montpellier, FranceGoogle Scholar
  6. Benda L, Poff NL, Miller D, Dunne T, Reeves G, Pess G, Pollock M (2004) The network dynamics hypothesis: how channel networks structure riverine habitats. Bioscience 54:413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berdan EL, Fuller RC (2012) A test for environmental effects on behavioral isolation in two species of killifish. Evolution 66:3224–3237PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Black A, Howell WM (1978) A distinctive chromosomal race of the cyprinodontid fish, Fundulus notatus from the Upper Tombigbee River system of Alabama and Mississippi. Copeia 1978:280–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blanchard TA (1996) Ovarian cycles and microhabitat use in two species of topminnows, Fundulus olivaceus and F. euryzonus, from the southeastern United States. Env Biol Fish 47:155–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Braasch ME, Smith PW (1965) Relationships of the topminnows Fundulus notatus and Fundulus olivaceus in the Upper Mississippi River Valley. Copeia 1965:46–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bull CM (1991) Ecology of parapatric distributions. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 22:19–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cooke GM, Chao NL, Beheregaray LB (2012) Divergent natural selection with gene flow along major environmental gradients in Amazonia: insights from genome scans, population genetics and phylogeography of the characin fish Triportheus albus. Mol Ecol 21:2410–2427PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Culumber ZW, Fisher HS, Tobler M, Mateos M, Barber PH, Sorenson MD, Rosenthal GG (2011) Replicated hybrid zones of Xiphophorus swordtails along an elevational gradient. Mol Ecol 20:342–356PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Culumber ZW, Shepard DB, Coleman SW, Rosenthal GG, Tobler M (2012) Physiological adaptation along environmental gradients and replicated hybrid zone structure of swordtails (Teleostei:Xiphophorus). J Evol Biol 25:1800–1814PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cummins KW (1962) An evaluation of some techniques for the collection and analysis of benthic samples with special emphasis on lotic waters. Am Mid Nat 67:477–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Duvernell DD, Schaefer JF, Hancks D, Fonoti J, Ravanelli AM (2007) Hybridization and introgression among syntopic populations of the topminnows Fundulus notatus and F. olivaceus. J Evol Biol 20:152–164PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Duvernell DD, Meier S, Schaefer JF, Kreiser BR (2013) Contrasting phylogeographic histories between broadly sympatric topminnows in the Fundulus notatus species complex. Mol Phyl Evol (in review)Google Scholar
  18. Fuller RC, McGhee KE, Schrader M (2007) Speciation in killifish and the role of salt tolerance. J Evol Biol 20:1962–1975PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gorman OT (1986) Assemblage organization of stream fishes: the effect of rivers on adventitious streams. Am Nat 128:611–616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Griffiths D (2010) Pattern and process in the distribution of North American freshwater fish. Biol J Linn Soc 100:46–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hewitt GM (1988) Hybrid zones-natural laboratories for evolutionary studies. Trends Ecol Evol 3:158–167PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hitt NP, Angermeier PL, Hughes RH, Wang L, Seelbach PW (2006) Effects of adjacent streams on local fish assemblage structure in western Virginia: implications for biomonitoring. Am Fish Soc Symp 48:75–86Google Scholar
  23. Howell WM, Black A (1981) Karyotypes in populations of the cyprinodontid fishes of the Fundulus notatus Species complex: a geographic analysis. Bul Al Mus Nat Hist 6:19–30Google Scholar
  24. Kawecki TJ, Ebert D (2004) Conceptual issues in local adaptation. Ecol Let 7:1225–1241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Langerhans RB (2008) Predictability of phenotypic differentiation across flow regimes in fishes. Integr Comp Biol 48:750–768PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Langerhans RB, Layman CA, Shokrollahi A, DeWitt TJ (2004) Predator-driven phenotypic diversification in Gambusia affinis. Evolution 58:2305–2318PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. McKinnon JS, Rundle HD (2002) Speciation in nature: the threespine stickleback model systems. Trends Ecol Evol 17:480–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McKinnon JS, Mori S, Blackman BK, David L, Kingsley DM, Jamieson L, Chou J, Schluter D (2004) Evidence for ecology’s role in speciation. Nature 429:294–298PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Osborne LL, Wiley MJ (1992) Influence of tributary spatial position on the structure of warmwater fish communities. Can J Fish Aq Sci 49:671–681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pritchard JR, Schluter D (2001) Declining interspecific competition during character displacement: summoning the ghost of competition past. Evol Ecol Res 3:209–220Google Scholar
  31. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Reifová R, Reif J, Antczak M, Nachman MW (2011) Ecological character displacement in the face of gene flow: evidence from two species of nightingales. BMC Evol Biol 11:138PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Reznick DN, Bryga HA (1996) Life-history evolution in guppies (Poecilia reticulata: Poeciliidae). v. genetic basis of parallelism in life histories. Am Nat 147:339–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Reznick D, Endler JA (1982) The impact of predation on life history evolution in Trinidadian guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Evolution 36:160–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Reznick DN, Byrga HA, Endler JA (1990) Experimentally induced life-history evolution in a natural population. Nature 346:357–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rice SP, Greenwood MT, Joyce CB (2001) Tributaries, sediment sources, and the longitudinal organization of macroinvertebrate fauna along river systems. Can J Fish Aq Sci 58:824–840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schaefer JF (2012) Hatch success and temperature dependent development time in two broadly distributed topminnows (Fundulidae). Naturwissenschaften 99:591–595PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schaefer JF, Kerfoot JR (2004) Fish assemblage dynamics in an adventitious stream: a landscape perspective. Am Mid Nat 151:134–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schaefer J, Walters A (2010) Metabolic cold adaptation and developmental plasticity in metabolic rates among species in the Fundulus notatus species complex. Func Ecol 24:1087–1094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schaefer J, Kreiser BK, Champagne C, Mickle PM, Duvernell DD (2009) Patterns of co-existence and hybridization among two topminnows (Fundulus euryzonus and F. olivaceus) in a riverine contact zone. Ecol Fresh Fish 18:360–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schaefer JF, Duvernell DD, Kreiser BR (2011a) Ecological and genetic assessment of spatial structure among replicate contact zones between two topminnow species. Evol Ecol 24:1145–1161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schaefer J, Duvernell DD, Kreiser BR (2011b) Shape variability in topminnows (Fundulus notatus species complex) along the river continuum. Biol J Linn Soc 103:612–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schluter D (2009) Evidence for ecological speciation and its alternative. Science 323:737–741PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schluter D, Conte GL (2009) Genetics and ecological speciation. Proc Nat Acad Sci 106:9955–9962PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schluter D, McPhail JD (1992) Ecological character displacement and speciation in sticklebacks. Am Nat 140:85–108PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Seehausen O, Takimoto G, Roy D, Jokela J (2008) Speciation reversal and biodiversity dynamics with hybridization in changing environments. Mol Ecol 17:30–44PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Setzer P (1970) An analysis of a natural hybrid swarm by means of chromosome morphology. Trans Am Fish Soc 99:139–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Seutin G, White BN, Boag PT (1991) Preservation of avian blood and tissue samples for DNA analyses. Can J Zoo 69:82–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Smithson EB, Johnson CE (1999) Movement patterns of stream fishes in a Ouachita highlands stream: an examination of the restricted movement paradigm. Trans Am Fish Soc 128:847–853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Stelkens RB, Seehausen O (2009) Phenotypic divergence but not genetic distance predicts assortative mating among species of a cichlid fish radiation. J Evol Biol 22:1679–1694PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Strahler AN (1957) Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. Trans Am Geo Un 38:913–920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sutton SG, Bult TP, Haedrich RL (2000) Relationships among fat weight, body weight, water weight, and condition factors in wild Atlantic salmon parr. Trans Am Fish Soc 129:527–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Swenson NG, Howard DJ (2005) Clustering of contact zones, hybrid zones, and phylogeographic breaks in North America. Am Nat 166:581–591PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Thomerson JE (1966) A comparative biosystematic study of Fundulus notatus and Fundulus olivaceous (Pices: Cyprinodontidae). Tul Stud Zool 13:29–47Google Scholar
  55. Thomerson JE, Woolridge DP (1970) Food habits of allotopic and syntopic populations of the topminnows Fundulus olivaceus and Fundulus notatus. Am Mid Nat 84:573–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tipton JA, Bart HL, Piller KL (2004) Geomorphic disturbance and its impact on darter (Teleostomi: Percidae) distribution and abundance in the Pearl River drainage, Mississippi. Hydrobiologia 527:49–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Tobler M, DeWitt TJ, Schlupp I, García de León FJ, Herrmann R, Feulner PGD, Tiedmann R, Plath M (2008) Toxic hydrogen sulfide and dark caves: phenotypic and genetic divergence across two environmental gradients. Evolution 62:2643–2659PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Vaha J, Primmer CR (2006) Efficiency of model-based Bayesian methods for detecting hybrid individuals under different hybridization scenarios and with different numbers of loci. Mol Ecol 15:63–72PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Vamosi SM, Heard SB, Vamosi JC, Webb CO (2008) Emerging patterns in the comparative analysis of phylogenetic community structure. Mol Ecol 18:572–592PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Vannote RL, Minshall GW, Cummins KW, Sedell JR, Cushing CE (1980) The river continuum concept. Can J Fish Aqua Sci 37:130–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Vigueira P, Schaefer JF, Duvernell DD, Kreiser BR (2008) Tests of reproductive isolation among species in the Fundulus notatus (Cyprinodontiformes: Fundulidae) species complex. Evol Ecol 22:55–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Vines TH, Schluter D (2006) Strong assortative mating between allopatric sticklebacks as a by-product of adaptation to different environments. Proc R Soc B 273:911–916PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Ward JL, Blum MJ (2012) Exposure to an environmental estrogen breaks down sexual isolation between native and invasive species. Evol App 5:901–912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Weir BS, Cockerham CC (1984) Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38:1358–1370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wiley EO, Mayden RL (1985) Species and speciation in phylogenetic systematics, with examples from the North American fish fauna. Ann Mo Bot Gar 72:596–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Winemiller KO, Rose KA (1992) Patterns of life-history diversification in North American fishes: implications for population regulation. Can J Fish Aqua Sci 49:2196–2218CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesSouthern Illinois University EdwardsvilleEdwardsvilleUSA
  2. 2.Department of Biological SciencesThe University of Southern MississippiHattiesburgUSA

Personalised recommendations