Evolutionary Ecology

, Volume 27, Issue 6, pp 1199–1216 | Cite as

Feather mass and winter moult extent are heritable but not associated with fitness-related traits in a long-distance migratory bird

  • Iván de la HeraEmail author
  • Thomas E. Reed
  • Francisco Pulido
  • Marcel E. Visser
Original Paper


In birds, the allocation of resources to plumage production may have important fitness consequences. However, we have only a limited understanding of how plumage traits respond to natural selection, making it difficult to predict how variation in plumage traits may contribute to the adaptation of birds to environmental change. In this study, we collected plumage-related data in a pedigreed population of a long-distance migratory bird (the Pied Flycatcher Ficedula hypoleuca) to estimate the heritability of two plumage traits: feather mass (as a proxy of feather quality) and the extent of winter moult. We further explored whether these plumage features were associated with some fitness-related traits. Variation in plumage characteristics could be explained by differences in sex, age and year, which indicates a high degree of plasticity in these traits. After controlling for these effects, however, feather mass and winter moult extent were highly repeatable (r = 0.58–0.82) and heritable (h2 = 0.59–0.65), suggesting that additive genetic variation accounts for a significant proportion of the residual phenotypic variation of plumage traits in this population. Although the studied characteristics showed evolutionary potential, we did not find any relationship between plumage features and fitness-related traits like spring arrival date, egg-laying date, mating success or mating-time. We conclude that current selection on feather mass and moult extent, if existing, is weak, and that these moult-related traits are currently of minor importance for the adaptation of our study population to global warming.


Coefficient of additive genetic variation Animal model Avian migration MCMCglmm 



We want to thank all the people that helped during the fieldwork, and particularly to H. Bouwmeester, C. Rueda, N. Turreira and R. Roig. We are also grateful to K. van Oers, P. Gienapp and C.M. Lessells for valuable discussion. This study was funded by the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (VICI grant to M.E.V.), the Department of Education, Universities and Research of the Basque Government (studentship BFI. 09-13 to I.H.), and the Spanish Ministry of Education (MEC; RYC-2007-01861 to F.P.).


  1. Baayen RH (2008) languageR: data sets and functions with analyzing linguistic data: a practical introduction to statistics. R Package Version 0.953.
  2. Battley PF (2006) Consistent annual schedules in a migratory songbird. Biol Lett 2:517–520PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Both C, Visser ME (2001) Adjustment to climate change is constrained by arrival date in a long-distance migrant bird. Nature 411:296–298PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Both C, Bouwhuis S, Lessells CM, Visser ME (2006) Climate change and population declines in a long-distance migratory bird. Nature 441:81–83PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bushuev AV, Ivankina EV, Kerimov AB (2006) Sex differences in resting metabolic rate in Pied Flycatchers. J Ornithol 147:101Google Scholar
  6. Butler LK, Rohwer S, Speidel MG (2008) Quantifying structural variation in contour feathers to address functional variation and life history trade-offs. J Avian Biol 39:629–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Charmantier A, Reale D (2005) How do misassigned paternities affect the estimation of heritability in the wild? Mol Ecol 14:2839–2850PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coppack T, Both C (2002) Predicting life-cycle adaptation of migratory birds to global climate change. Ardea 90:369–378Google Scholar
  9. Dale S, Slagsvold T, Lampe HM, Sætre GP (1999) Population divergence in sexual ornaments: the white forehead patch of Norwegian Pied Flycatchers is small and unsexy. Evolution 53:1235–1246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dawson A (2004) The effects of delaying the start of moult on the duration of moult, primary feather growth rates and feather mass in Common Starlings Sturnus vulgaris. Ibis 146:493–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dawson A (2005) The effect of temperature on photoperiodically regulated gonadal maturation, regression and moult in starlings—potential consequences of climate change. Func Ecol 19:995–1000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dawson A, Hinsley SA, Ferns PN, Bonser RHC, Eccleston L (2000) Rate of moult affects feather quality: a mechanism linking current reproductive effort to future survival. Proc R Soc B 267:2093–2098PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. de la Hera I, Díaz JA, Pérez-Tris J, Tellería JL (2009a) A comparative study of migratory behaviour and body mass as determinants of moult duration in passerines. J Avian Biol 40:461–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. de la Hera I, Pérez-Tris J, Tellería JL (2009b) Migratory behaviour affects the trade-off between feather growth rate and feather quality in a passerine bird. Biol J Lin Soc 97:98–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. de la Hera I, Pérez-Tris J, Tellería JL (2009c) Repeatable length and mass but not growth rate of individual feathers between moults in a passerine bird. Acta Orn 44:95–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. de la Hera I, Pérez-Tris J, Tellería JL (2010a) Relationships among timing of moult, moult duration and feather mass in long-distance migratory passerines. J Avian Biol 41:609–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. de la Hera I, Hedenström A, Pérez-Tris J, Tellería JL (2010b) Variation in the mechanical properties of flight feathers of the blackcap Sylvia atricapilla in relation to migration. J Avian Biol 41:342–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. de la Hera I, Hedenström A, Pérez-Tris J, Tellería JL (2010c) Structural and mechanical differences between original and replaced feathers in Blackcaps Sylvia atricapilla. Ardeola 47:431–436Google Scholar
  19. Dohm MR (2002) Repeatability estimates do not always set an upper limit to heritability. Funct Ecol 16:273–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Donnelly A, Caffarra A, Kelleher CT, O’Neill BF, Diskin E, Pletsers A, Proctor H, Stirnemann R, O’Halloran J, Peñuelas J, Hodkinson TR, Sparks TH (2012) Surviving in a warmer world: environmental and genetic responses. Clim Res 53:245–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Falconer DS, Mackay TFC (1996) Introduction to quantitative genetics. Longman, EssexGoogle Scholar
  22. Galván I, Moreno J (2009) Variation in effects of male plumage ornaments: the case of Iberian Pied Flycatchers. Ibis 151:541–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gienapp P, Merila J (2010) Genetic and environmental effects on a condition-dependent trait: feather growth in Siberian jays. J Evol Biol 23:715–723PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ginn HB, Melville DS (1983) Moult in birds. BTO, TringGoogle Scholar
  25. Griggio M, Serra L, Licheri D, Campomori C, Pilastro A (2009) Molt speed affects structural feather ornaments in the Blue Tit. J Evol Biol 22:782–792PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gunnarsson TG, Gill JA, Newton J, Potts PM, Sutherland WJ (2005) Seasonal matching of habitat quality and fitness in a migratory bird. Proc R Soc B 272:2319–2323PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hadfield JD (2010) MCMC methods for multi-response generalised linear mixed models: the MCMCglmm R package. J Stat Soft 33:1–22Google Scholar
  28. Hall KSS, Fransson T (2001) Wing moult in relation to autumn migration in adult Common Whitethroats Sylvia communis communis. Ibis 143:580–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hedenstrom A, Barta Z, Helm B, Houston AI, McNamara JM, Jonzen N (2007) Migration speed and scheduling of annual events by migrating birds in relation to climate change. Clim Res 35:79–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Houle D (1992) Comparing evolvability and variability of quantitative traits. Genetics 130:195–204PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Huhta E, Alatalo RV (1993) Plumage colour and male–male interactions in the pied flycatcher. Anim Behav 45:511–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Husby A, Gustafsson L, Qvarnström A (2012) Low genetic variance in the duration of the incubation period in a Collared Flycatcher (Ficedula albicollis) population. Am Nat 179:132–136PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jenni L, Winkler R (1994) Moult and ageing of European passerines. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  34. Jonzen N, Linden A, Ergon T, Knudsen E, Vik JO, Rubolini D, Piacentini D, Brinch C, Spina F, Karlsson L, Stervander M, Andersson A, Waldenstrom J, Lehikoinen A, Edvardsen E, Solvang R, Stenseth NC (2006) Rapid advance of spring arrival dates in long-distance migratory birds. Science 312:1959–1961PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. King DA (2004) Climate change science: adapt, mitigate or ignore? Science 303:176–177PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Klaassen M (1995) Moult and basal metabolic costs in males of two subspecies of stonechats: the European Saxicola torquata rubicula and the East African S. t. axillaris. Oecologia 104:424–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Knudsen E, Lindén A, Both C, Jonzén N, Pulido F, Saino N, Sutherland WJ, Bach LA, Coppack T, Ergon T, Gienapp P, Gill JA, Gordo O, Hedenström A, Lehikoinen E, Marra PP, Møller AP, Nilsson ALK, Péron G, Ranta E, Rubolini D, Sparks TH, Spina F, Studds CE, Sæther SA, Tryjanowski P, Stenseth NC (2011) Challenging claims in the study of migratory birds and climate change. Biol Rev 86:928–946PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kruuk LEB (2004) Estimating genetic parameters in natural populations using the animal model. Phil Trans R Soc B 359:873–890PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kruuk LEB, Hadfield JD (2007) How to separate genetic and environmental causes of similarity between relatives. J Evol Biol 20:1890–1903PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lind J (2001) Escape flight in moulting tree sparrows (Passer montanus). Funct Ecol 15:29–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lindström A, Visser GH, Dann S (1993) The energetic cost of feather synthesis is proportional to basal metabolic rate. Physiol Zool 66:490–510Google Scholar
  42. López G, Figuerola J, Varo N, Soriguer R (2005) White Wagtails Motacilla alba showing extensive post-juvenile moult are more stressed. Ardea 93:237–244Google Scholar
  43. Lundberg A, Alatalo RV (1992) The pied flycatcher. T and AD Poyser, LondonGoogle Scholar
  44. Møller AP, Fiedler W, Berthold P (2010) Effects of climate change on birds. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  45. Møller AP, Nuttall R, Piper SE, Szep T, Vickers EJ (2011) Migration, moult and climate change in barn swallows Hirundo rustica in South Africa. Clim Res 47:201–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Nilsson JA, Svensson E (1996) The cost of reproduction: a new link between current reproductive effort and future reproductive success. Proc R Soc B 263:711–714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Peñuelas J, Filella I, Comas P (2002) Changed plant and animal life cycles from 1952 to 2000 in the Mediterranean region. Glob Chang Biol 8:531–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Postma E (2010) Using animal models to infer and predict the evolutionary consequences of climate change. In: Møller AP, Fiedler W, Berthold P (eds) Effects of climate change on birds. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 47–55Google Scholar
  49. Potti J (1998) Arrival time from spring migration in male Pied Flycatchers: individual consistency and familial resemblance. Condor 100:702–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pulido F (2007) Phenotypic changes in spring arrival: evolution, phenotypic plasticity, effects of weather and condition. Clim Res 35:5–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pulido F, Berthold P (2004) Microevolutionary response to climate change. Adv Ecol Res 35:149–181Google Scholar
  52. Pulido F, Coppack T (2004) Correlation between timing of juvenile moult and onset of migration in the blackcap, Sylvia atricapilla. Anim Behav 68:167–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Reed TE, Schindler DE, Waples RS (2010) Interacting effects of phenotypic plasticity and evolution on population persistence in a changing climate. Cons Biol 25:56–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Robinson RA, Crick HQP, Learmonth JA et al (2009) Travelling through a warming world: climate change and migratory species. Endanger Species Res 7:87–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rubolini D, Spina F, Saino N (2005) Correlates of timing of spring migration in birds: a comparative study of trans-Saharan migrants. Biol J Linn Soc 85:199–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rubolini D, Saino N, Moller AP (2010) Migratory behaviour constrains the phenological response of birds to climate change. Clim Res 42:45–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Salewski V, Altwegg R, Erni B, Falk KH, Bairlein F, Leisler B (2004) Moult of three Palaearctic migrants in their West African winter quarters. J Ornith 145:109–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Senar JC, Copete JL, Martin AJ (1998) Behavioural and morphological correlates of variation in the extent of postjuvenile moult in the Siskin Carduelis spinus. Ibis 140:661–669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Svensson L (1992) Identification guide to European passerines. L. Svensson, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  60. Visser ME (2008) Keeping up with a warming world; assessing the rate of adaptation to climate change. Proc R Soc B 275:649–659PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wilson AJ (2008) Why h2 does not always equal VA/VP? J Evol Biol 21:647–650PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wilson AJ, Réale D, Michelle NC, Morrissey MM, Postma E, Walling CA, Kruuk LE, Nussey DH (2009) An ecologist’s guide to the animal model. J Anim Ecol 79:13–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Iván de la Hera
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Thomas E. Reed
    • 1
  • Francisco Pulido
    • 1
    • 3
  • Marcel E. Visser
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Animal EcologyNetherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW)WageningenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of Zoology and Animal Cell BiologyUniversidad del País Vasco (UPV/EHU)Vitoria-GasteizSpain
  3. 3.Department of Zoology and Physical Anthropology, Faculty of BiologyUniversidad Complutense de MadridMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations