Advertisement

Evolutionary Ecology

, Volume 27, Issue 6, pp 1159–1173 | Cite as

Niche evolution in Australian terrestrial mammals? Clarifying scale-dependencies in phylogenetic and functional drivers of co-occurrence

  • Gilad BinoEmail author
  • Daniel Ramp
  • Richard T. Kingsford
Original Paper

Abstract

Interactive forces between competition and habitat filtering drive many biogeographic patterns over evolutionary time scales. However, the responsiveness of assemblages to these two forces is highly influenced by spatial scale, forming complex patterns of niche separation. We explored these spatial dependencies by quantifying the influence of phylogeny and functional traits in shaping present day native terrestrial mammal assemblages at multiple scales, principally by identifying the spatial scales at which niche evolution operates. We modelled the distribution of 53 native terrestrial mammal species across New South Wales, Australia. Using predicted distributions, we estimated the range overlap between each pair of species at increasing grain sizes (~0.8, 5.1, 20, 81, 506, 2,025, 8,100 km2). We employed a decision tree to identify how interactions among functional traits and phylogenetic relatedness translated to levels of sympatry at increasing spatial scales. We found that Australian terrestrial mammals displayed phylogenetic over-dispersion that was inversely related to spatial scale, suggesting that ecological processes were more influential than biogeographic sympatry patterns in defining assemblages of species. While the contribution of phylogenetic relatedness to patterns of co-occurrence decreased as spatial scale increased, the reverse was true for habitat preferences. At the same time, functional traits also operated at different scales, as dietary preferences dominated at local spatial scales (<10 km2) while body mass has a stronger effect at larger spatial scales. Our findings show that ecological and evolutionary processes operate at different scales and that Australian terrestrial mammals diverged slower along their micro-scale niche compared to their macro-scale niche. By combining phylogenetic and niche methods through the modelling of species distributions, we assessed whether specific traits were related to a particular niche. More importantly, conducting multi-scale spatial analysis avoids categorical assignment of traits-to-niches, providing a clearer relationship between traits and a species ecological niche and a more precise scaling for the axes of niche evolution.

Keywords

Biogeography Niche conservatism Habitat filtering Phylogenetic clustering Community ecology Mammals Australia 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was part of Australian Research Council Linkage Project LP0774833 titled “Managing for ecosystem change in the GBMWHA”. We thank the following partner organizations for their support: the Blue Mountains World Heritage Institute, the Blue Mountains City Council, the New South Wales Department of Environment and Climate Change (DECCW), the New South Wales Department of Primary Industries and the Hawkesbury-Nepean Catchment and Management Authority. GB was supported by an Australian Postgraduate Award. We are grateful to DECCW for the provision of Atlas data. We thank Evan Webster for providing valuable technical support. We are especially thankful for the anonymous comments from two anonymous reviewers and the Editor in Chief Prof. John A Endler.

Supplementary material

10682_2013_9631_MOESM1_ESM.docx (687 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 687 kb)

References

  1. Abrams PA, Rueffler C (2009) Coexistence and limiting similarity of consumer species competing for a linear array of resources. Ecology 90:812–822PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ackerly DD, Schwilk DW, Webb CO (2006) Niche evolution and adaptive radiation: testing the order of trait divergence. Ecology 87:S50–S61PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Australian Faunal Directory (2009) Australian biological resources study. Australian Government, Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  4. Bininda-Emonds ORP, Cardillo M, Jones KE, MacPhee RDE, Beck RMD, Grenyer R, Price SA, Vos RA, Gittleman JL, Purvis A (2007) The delayed rise of present-day mammals. Nature 446:507–512PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bino G, Ramp D, Kingsford RT (2012) Improving bioregional frameworks for conservation by including mammal distributions. Austral Ecol. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9993.2012.02423.x
  6. Blackburn TM, Petchey OL, Cassey P, Gaston KJ (2005) Functional diversity of mammalian predators and extinction in island birds. Ecology 86:2916–2923CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blanckenhorn WU (2000) The evolution of body size: what keeps organisms small? Q Rev Biol 75:385–407PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blomberg SP, Garland T, Ives AR (2003) Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution 57:717–745PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Bohning-Gaese K, Oberrath R (1999) Phylogenetic effects on morphological, life-history, behavioural and ecological traits of birds. Evol Ecol Res 1:347–364Google Scholar
  10. Boitani L, Sinibaldi I, Corsi F, De Biase A, Carranza I, Ravagli M, Reggiani G, Rondinini C, Trapanese P (2008) Distribution of medium- to large-sized African mammals based on habitat suitability models. Biodiversity Conserv 17:605–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bradley RD, Baker RJ (2001) A test of the genetic species concept: cytochrome-b sequences and mammals. J Mammal 82:960–973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bray JR, Curtis JT (1957) An ordination of the Upland Forest Communities of Southern Wisconsin. Ecol Monogr 27:325–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Breiman L (2001) Random forests. Mach Learn 45:5–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information–theoretic approach. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Cardillo M (2011) Phylogenetic structure of mammal assemblages at large geographical scales: linking phylogenetic community ecology with macroecology. Philos Trans R Soc B 366:2545–2553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cavender-Bares J, Keen A, Miles B (2006) Phylogenetic structure of floridian plant communities depends on taxonomic and spatial scale. Ecology 87:S109–S122PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cavender-Bares J, Kozak KH, Fine PV, Kembel SW (2009) The merging of community ecology and phylogenetic biology. Ecol Lett 12:693–715PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Clarke K, Warwick R (2001) Change in marine communities: an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation, 2nd edn. PRIMER-E, PlymouthGoogle Scholar
  19. Cooper N, Rodríguez J, Purvis A (2008) A common tendency for phylogenetic overdispersion in mammalian assemblages. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 275:2031–2037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cornwell WK, Schwilk DW, Ackerly DD (2006) A trait-based test for habitat filtering: convex hull volume. Ecology 87:1465–1471PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Crisp MD, Arroyo MTK, Cook LG, Gandolfo MA, Jordan GJ, McGlone MS, Weston PH, Westoby M, Wilf P, Linder HP (2009) Phylogenetic biome conservatism on a global scale. Nature 458:754–756PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cutler DR, Edwards TC Jr, Beard KH, Cutler A, Hess KT, Gibson J, Lawler JJ (2007) Random forests for classification in ecology. Ecology 88:2783–2792PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Davidson AD, Hamilton MJ, Boyer AG, Brown JH, Ceballos G (2009) Multiple ecological pathways to extinction in mammals. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:10702–10705PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. De’ath G, Fabricius KE (2000) Classification and regression trees: a powerful yet simple technique for ecological data analysis. Ecology 81:3178–3192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. DECCW (2009) The atlas of NSW wildlife. The NSW Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  26. Diamond JM (1975) Assembly of species communities. In: Cody ML, Diamond JM (eds) Ecology and evolution of communities. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 342–444Google Scholar
  27. Diamond JM (1986) Evolution of ecological segregation in the New Guinea montane avifauna. In: Diamond JM, Case TJ (eds) Community Ecol. Harper and Row, Cambridge, pp 98–125Google Scholar
  28. Efron B, Tibshirani R (1997) Improvements on cross-validation: the.632 + bootstrap method. J Am Stat Assoc 92:548–560Google Scholar
  29. Elton C (1946) Competition and the structure of ecological communities. J Anim Ecol 15:54–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Emerson BC, Gillespie RG (2008) Phylogenetic analysis of community assembly and structure over space and time. Trends Ecol Evol 23:619–630PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Flynn DFB, Gogol-Prokurat M, Nogeire T, Molinari N, Richers BT, Lin BB, Simpson N, Mayfield MM, DeClerck F (2009) Loss of functional diversity under land use intensification across multiple taxa. Ecol Lett 12:22–33PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Freckleton RP, Jetz W (2009) Space versus phylogeny: disentangling phylogenetic and spatial signals in comparative data. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 276:21–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Freckleton RP, Harvey PH, Pagel M (2002) Phylogenetic analysis and comparative data: a test and review of evidence. Am Nat 160:712–726PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Fritz SA, Bininda-Emonds ORP, Purvis A (2009) Geographical variation in predictors of mammalian extinction risk: big is bad, but only in the tropics. Ecol Lett 12:538–549PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gleason HA (1917) The structure and development of the plant association. Bull Torrey Bot Club 44:463–481Google Scholar
  36. González AL, Fariña JM, Kay AD, Pinto R, Marquet PA (2011) Exploring patterns and mechanisms of interspecific and intraspecific variation in body elemental composition of desert consumers. Oikos 120:1247–1255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Graham CH, Ron SR, Santos JC, Schneider CJ, Moritz C (2004) Integrating phylogenetics and environmental niche models to explore speciation mechanisms in dendrobatid frogs. Evolution 58:1781–1793PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Guisan A, Thuiller W (2005) Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models. Ecol Lett 8:993–1009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Harmon LJ, Glor RE (2010) Poor statistical performance of the Mantel test in phylogenetic comparative analyses. Evolution 64:2173–2178PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J (2009) The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference and prediction. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Holt RD (2009) Bringing the Hutchinsonian niche into the 21st century: ecological and evolutionary perspectives. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106:19659–19665PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hutchinson GE (1957) Population studies—animal ecology and demography—concluding remarks. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 22:415–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ingram T (2011) Speciation along a depth gradient in a marine adaptive radiation. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 278:613–618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Jablonski D, Sepkoski JJ (1996) Paleobiology, community ecology, and scales of ecological pattern. Ecology 77:1367–1378PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Jackson SM (2003) Australian mammals: biology and captive management. CSIRO Publishing, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  46. Jenkins DG, Brescacin CR, Duxbury CV, Elliott JA, Evans JA, Grablow KR, Hillegass M, Lyon BN, Metzger GA, Olandese ML, Pepe D, Silvers GA, Suresch HN, Thompson TN, Trexler CM, Williams GE, Williams NC, Williams SE (2007) Does size matter for dispersal distance? Glob Ecol Biogeogr 16:415–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Johnson CN, Isaac JL (2009) Body mass and extinction risk in Australian marsupials: the ‘critical weight range’ revisited. Austral Ecol 34:35–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Jones MJ, Fielding A, Sullivan M (2006) Analysing extinction risk in parrots using decision trees. Biodiversity Conserv 15:1993–2007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Justice CO, Vermote E, Townshend JRG, Defries R, Roy DP, Hall DK, Salomonson VV, Privette JL, Riggs G, Strahler A, Lucht W, Myneni RB, Knyazikhin Y, Running SW, Nemani RR, Wan ZM, Huete AR, van Leeuwen W, Wolfe RE, Giglio L, Muller JP, Lewis P, Barnsley MJ (1998) The moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer (MODIS): land remote sensing for global change research. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote 36:1228–1249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kembel SW, Cowan PD, Helmus MR, Cornwell WK, Morlon H, Ackerly DD, Blomberg SP, Webb CO (2010) Picante: R tools for integrating phylogenies and ecology. Bioinformatics 26:1463–1464PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kingsford RT, Brandis K, Thomas RF, Crighton P, Knowles E, Gale E (2004) Classifying landform at broad spatial scales: the distribution and conservation of wetlands in New South Wales. Australia. Mar. Freshw. Res. 55:17–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Kodandaramaiah U, Konvicka M, Tammaru T, Wahlberg N, Gotthard K (2012) Phylogeography of the threatened butterfly, the woodland brown < i > Lopinga achine (Nymphalidae: Satyrinae): implications for conservation. J Insect Conserv 16:305–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, McWilliam H, Valentin F, Wallace IM, Wilm A, Lopez R, Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Higgins DG (2007) Clustal W and clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 23:2947–2948PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Leathwick JR, Elith J, Hastie T (2006) Comparative performance of generalized additive models and multivariate adaptive regression splines for statistical modelling of species distributions. Ecol Model 199:188–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Liaw A, Wiener M (2002) Classification and Regression by randomForest. R News 2:18–22Google Scholar
  56. Losos JB (2008) Phylogenetic niche conservatism, phylogenetic signal and the relationship between phylogenetic relatedness and ecological similarity among species. Ecol Lett 11:995–1003PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Losos JB (2009) Lizards in an evolutionary tree: the ecology of adaptive radiation in anoles. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  58. Losos JB, Leal M, Glor RE, De Queiroz K, Hertz PE, Rodriguez Schettino L, Lara AC, Jackman TR, Larson A (2003) Niche lability in the evolution of a Caribbean lizard community. Nature 424:542–545PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Lovette IJ, Hochachka WM (2006) Simultaneous effects of phylogenetic niche conservatism and competition on avian community structure. Ecology 87:14–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Macarthur R, Levins R (1967) The limiting similarity, convergence, and divergence of coexisting species. Am Nat 101:377–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Menkhorst PW, Knight F (2004) A field guide to the mammals of Australia. Oxford University Press, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  62. Millar JS, Hickling GJ (1991) Body size and the evolution of mammalian life histories. Funct Ecol 5:588–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Moritz C, Faith DP (1998) Comparative phylogeography and the identification of genetically divergent areas for conservation. Mol Ecol 7:419–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Münkemüller T, Bugmann H, Johst K (2009) Hutchinson revisited: patterns of density regulation and the coexistence of strong competitors. J Theor Biol 259:109–117PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Nix H (1986) A biogeographic analysis of Australian Elapid snakes. In: Longmore R (ed) Snakes: atlas of Elapid snakes of Australia. Bureau of Flora and Fauna, Canberra, pp 4–10Google Scholar
  66. Olden JD, Lawler JJ, Poff NL (2008) Machine learning methods without tears: a primer for ecologists. Q Rev Biol 83:171–193PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Paradis E, Claude J, Strimmer K (2004) APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 20:289–290PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Parson W, Pegoraro K, Niederstatter H, Foger M, Steinlechner M (2000) Species identification by means of the cytochrome b gene. Int J Leg Med 114:23–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Peters RH (1983) The ecological implications of body size. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Rice NH, Martinez-Meyer E, Peterson AT (2003) Ecological niche differentiation in the Aphelocoma jays: a phylogenetic perspective. Biol J Linn Soc 80:369–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Ricklefs RE (2004) A comprehensive framework for global patterns in biodiversity. Ecol Lett 7:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Rodríguez MÁ, López-Sañudo IL, Hawkins BA (2006) The geographic distribution of mammal body size in Europe. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 15:173–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Rosenzweig ML (1995) Species diversity in space and time. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Scoble J, Lowe AJ (2010) A case for incorporating phylogeography and landscape genetics into species distribution modelling approaches to improve climate adaptation and conservation planning. Diversity Distrib 16:343–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Sibly RM, Brown JH (2007) Effects of body size and lifestyle on evolution of mammal life histories. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:17707–17712PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Silvertown J, Dodd M, Gowing D, Lawson C, McConway K (2006) Phylogeny and the hierarchical organization of plant diversity. Ecology 87:S39–S49PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Stern H, de Hoedt G, Ernst J (2000) Objective classification of Australian climates. Aust Meteorol Mag 49:87–96Google Scholar
  78. Steyerberg EW, Harrell FE, Borsboom GJJM, Eijkemans MJC, Vergouwe Y, Habbema JDF (2001) Internal validation of predictive models: efficiency of some procedures for logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 54:774–781PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Strahan R (1984) Complete book of Australian mammals. Angus & Robertson Publishers, LondonGoogle Scholar
  80. Streelman TJ, Danley PD (2003) The stages of vertebrate evolutionary radiation. Trends Ecol Evol 18:126–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Sutherland GD, Harestad AS, Price K, Lertzman KP (2000) Scaling of natal dispersal distances in terrestrial birds and mammals. Conserv Ecol 4:16Google Scholar
  82. Swenson NG, Enquist BJ, Pither J, Thompson J, Zimmerman JK (2006) The problem and promise of scale dependency in community phylogenetics. Ecology 87:2418–2424PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. R Development Core Team (2010) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. URL http://www.R-project.org. Accessed 14 Mar 2011: R Foundation for Statistical Computing
  84. Tofts R, Silvertown J (2000) A phylogenetic approach to community assembly from a local species pool. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol 267:363–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Vamosi SM, Heard SB, Vamosi JC, Webb CO (2009) Emerging patterns in the comparative analysis of phylogenetic community structure. Mol Ecol 18:572–592PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Van der Vaart AW (1998) Asymptotic statistics. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Warren DL, Glor RE, Turelli M (2010) ENMTools: a toolbox for comparative studies of environmental niche models. Ecography 33:607–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Webb CO (2000) Exploring the phylogenetic structure of ecological communities: an example for rain forest trees. Am Nat 156:145–155PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Webb CO, Ackerly DD, McPeek MA, Donoghue MJ (2002) Phylogenies and community ecology. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 33:475–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Weiher E, Keddy PA (1995) The assembly of experimental wetland plant communities. Oikos 73:323–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Wiens JJ (2012) Perspective: why biogeography matters: historical biogeography vs. phylogeography and community phylogenetics for inferring ecological and evolutionary processes. Front Biogeogr 4:128–135Google Scholar
  92. Wiens JJ, Graham CH (2005) Niche conservatism: integrating evolution, ecology, and conservation biology. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 36:519–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gilad Bino
    • 1
    Email author
  • Daniel Ramp
    • 1
    • 2
  • Richard T. Kingsford
    • 1
  1. 1.Australian Wetlands, Rivers, and Landscapes Centre, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental SciencesUniversity of New South WalesSydneyAustralia
  2. 2.School of the EnvironmentUniversity of Technology SydneyBroadwayAustralia

Personalised recommendations