Evolutionary Ecology

, Volume 27, Issue 3, pp 579–591 | Cite as

Predation and the relative importance of larval colour polymorphisms and colour polyphenism in a damselfly

Original Paper


Intraspecific body colour variation is common in many animal species. Predation could be a key selective agent giving rise to variation in body colour, and such variation could be due to genetics (polymorphisms) or phenotypic plasticity (polyphenisms). In this study we examined the degree of colour polymorphism and polyphenism in background colour matching in larvae of the damselfly Coenagrionarmatum. In addition, we tested if predation risk is reduced when larvae are exposed to a matching compared to a non-matching background. By raising families of larvae at three different background colours we showed that polymorphism explained about 20 % of the total variation and polyphenism about 35 %. In a predation experiment with fish, we showed that larvae with a body colour matching the background had a higher survival success compared to larvae with a non-matching background colour. We suggest that the background matching is adaptive in terms of survival from predation and that colour diversity is maintained because of spatial and temporal variation in the background experienced by damselfly larvae under field conditions.


Colour polymorphism Predation Phenotypic plasticity Polyphenism Coenagrion armatum 


  1. Askew RR (2004) The dragonflies of Europe, revised edn. Harley Books, ColchesterGoogle Scholar
  2. Baayen RH, Davidson DJ, Bates D (2008) Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. J Mem Lang 4:390–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bakker TCM, Mazzi D, Sala S (1997) Parasite-induced changes in behavior and color make Gammarus pulex more prone to fish predation. Ecology 74:1098–1104Google Scholar
  4. Bates D, Maechler M, Dai B (2008) lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.999375-42. http://lme4.r-forge.r-project.org/
  5. Benke AC (1970) A method for comparing individual growth rates of aquatic insects with special reference to the odonata. Ecology 51:328–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bennett A, Cuthill I, Norris K (1994) Sexual selection and the mismeasure of colour. Am Nat 144:848–860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Candolin U, Salesto T, Evers M (2007) Changed environmental conditions weaken sexual selection in sticklebacks. J Evol Biol 20:233–239PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Canfield M, Greene E (2009) Phenotypic plasticity and the semantics of polyphenism: a historical review and current perspectives. In: Whitman DW, Ananthakrishnan TN (eds) Phenotypic plasticity of insects: mechanisms and consequences. Science Publishers, Enfield, pp 65–80Google Scholar
  9. Clarke JM, Schluter D (2011) Colour plasticity and background matching in a threespine stickleback species pair. Biol J Linn Soc 102:902–914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Deutsch JC (1997) Colour diversification in Malawi cichlids: evidence for adaptation, reinforcement or sexual selection? Biol J Linn Soc 62:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Endler JA (1978) A predator’s view of animal color patterns. Evol Biol 11:319–364Google Scholar
  12. Gray SM, McKinnon JS (2006) Linking color polymorphism maintenance and speciation. Trends Ecol Evol 22:71–79PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hanlon RT, Forsythe JW, Joneschild DE (1999) Crypsis, conspicuousness, mimicry and polyphenism as antipredator defences of foraging octopuses on Indo-Pacific coral reefs, with a method of quantifying crypsis from video tapes. Biol J Linn Soc 66:1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hargeby A, Johansson J, Ahnesjö J (2004) Habitat-specific pigmentation in a freshwater isopod: adaptive evolution over a small spatiotemporal scale. Evolution 58(81):94Google Scholar
  15. Henriksson B-I (1993) Sphagnum mosses as a microhabitat for invertebrates in acidified lakes and the colour adaptation and substrate preference in Leucorrhinia dubia (Odonata, Anisoptera). Ecography 16:143–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hoffmann EA, Blouin MS (2000) A review of colour and pattern polymorphisms in anurans. Biol J Linn Soc 70:633–665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Huxley JS (1955) Morphism and evolution. Heredity 9:1–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Johansson F (1993) Intraguild predation and cannibalism in odonate larvae—effects of foraging behaviour and zooplankton availability. Oikos 66:80–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Karlsson M, Caesar S, Ahnesjö J, Forsman A (2008) Dynamics of colour polymorphism in a changing environment: fire melanism and then what? Oecologi 154:715–724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kelber A, Osorio D (2010) From spectral information to animal colour vision: experiments and concepts. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 277:1617–1625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kettlewell HBD (1955) Selection experiments on industrial melanism in the Lepidoptera. Heredity 9:323–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Klinka DR, Reimchen TE (2009) Adaptive coat colour polymorphism in the Kermode bear of coastal British Columbia. Biol J Linn Soc 98:479–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Macan TT (1966) The influence of predation on the fauna of a moorland fishpond. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 61:432–452Google Scholar
  24. Majerus MEN (1998) Melanism: evolution in action. Oxford University press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Manríquez PH, Lagos NA, Jara MA, Castilla JC (2009) Adaptive shell colour plasticity during the early ontogeny of an intertidal keystone snail. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:16298–16303PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McGuffin MA, Baker RL, Forbes MR (2006) Detection and avoidance of fish predators by adult Enallagma damselflies. J Insect Behav 19:77–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McPeek MA (1989) Differential dispersal tendencies among Enallagma damselflies. (Odonata) inhabiting different habitats. Oikos 56:187–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Miller PL, Miller CA (1981) Field observations on copulatory behaviour in Zygoptera, with an examination of the structure and activity of male genitalia. Odonatologica 10:201–218Google Scholar
  29. Moran NA (1992) The evolutionary maintenance of alternative phenotypes. Am Nat 139:971–989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Moum SE, Baker RL (1990) Colour change and substrate selection in larval Ischnura verticalis (Coenagrionidae: Odonata). Can J Zool 68:221–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mullen LN, Hoekstra HE (2008) Natural selection along an environmental gradient: a classic cline in mouse pigmentation. Evolution 62:1555–1570Google Scholar
  32. Nachman MW, Hoekstra HE, D’Agostino S (2003) The genetic basis of adaptive melanism in pocket mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:5268–5273PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pinheiro J, Bates DM (2000) Mixed effects models in S and S-Plus. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ramachandran VS, Tyler CW, Gregory RL, Rogers-Ramachandran D, Duensing S, Pillsbury C, Ramachandran C (1996) Rapid adaptive camouflage in tropical flounders. Nature 379:815–818PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rick IP, Bloemker D, Bakker TCM (2012) Spectral composition and visual foraging in the three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteidae: Gasterosteus aculeatus L.): elucidating the role of ultraviolet wavelengths. Biol J Linn Soc 105:359–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ruxton GD, Sherrat TN, Speed MP (2004) Avoiding attack: the evolutionary ecology of crypsis, warning signals and mimicry. Oxford University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Scheiner SM (1993) Genetics and evolution of phenotypic plasticity. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 24:35–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schielzeth H (2010) Simple means to improve the interpretability of regression coefficients. Methods Ecol Evol 1:103–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Simpson SJ, Sword GA, Lo N (2011) Polyphenism in insects. Curr Biol 21:R738–R749PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Smith C, Barber I, Wotton RJ, Chittka L (2004) A receiver bias in the origin of three-spined stickleback mate choice. Proc R Soc Lond B 271:949–955CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. StatSoft, Inc., STATISTICA (data analysis software system), version 10. 2011, www.statsoft.com
  42. Stevens M, Rraga CA, Cuthill IC, Partridge JC, Troscianko TS (2007) Using digital photography to study animal color. Biol J Linn Soc 90:211–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Storfer A, Cross J, Rush V, Caruso J (1999) Adaptive colour and gene flow as a constraint to local adaptation in the streamside salamander, Ambystoma barbouri. Evolution 53:889–898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sultan SE, Spencer HG (2002) Metapopulation structure favors plasticity over local adaptation. Am Nat 160:271–283PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Svanbäck R, Eklöv P (2011) Catch me if you can—predation affects divergence in a polyphenetic species. Evolution 65:3515–3526PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Waage JK (1986) Evidence for widespread sperm displacement ability among Zygoptera (Odonata) and the means for predicting its presence. Biol J Linn Soc 28:285–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wente WH, Phillips JB (2003) Fixed green and brown color morphs and a novel color-changing morph of the pacific tree frog Hyla regilla. Am Nat 162:461–473PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Ecology and GeneticsUppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden
  2. 2.Department of Ecology and Environmental ScienceUmeå UniversityUmeaSweden

Personalised recommendations