Limited genetic differentiation between acoustically divergent populations of urban and rural silvereyes (Zosterops lateralis)

Abstract

The bioacoustic attributes of vocalisations made by birds in urban environments often differ markedly from those of rural conspecifics. Whether such differences are result from genetic divergence between urban and rural populations, or from plasticity or cultural evolution of song remains poorly understood. Silvereyes (Zosterops lateralis) show evidence of acoustic adaptation to urban noise, modifying both their songs and calls in cities when compared to rural areas. We investigated whether these differences were associated with corresponding morphological and neutral genetic differences. Across six pairs of geographically separate urban and rural populations, all morphological traits measured were similar. Furthermore, genetic analyses of variation at nine microsatellite loci revealed high levels of genetic connectivity between populations, and similar levels of heterozygosity in both habitat types. Consistent directional shifts in song attributes of city birds across large geographic areas thus do not appear to be accompanied by associated morphological or neutral genetic divergence.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Badyaev AV, Young RL, Oh KP, Addison C (2008) Evolution on a local scale: developmental, functional, and genetic bases of divergence in bill form and associated changes in song structure between adjacent habitats. Evolution 62:1951–1964

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Balloux F, Lugon-Moulin N (2002) The estimation of population differentiation with microsatellite markers. Mol Ecol 11:155–165

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Blondel J (2007) Coping with habitat heterogeneity: the story of Mediterranean blue tits. J Ornithol 148:3–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cardoso GC, Atwell JW (2011) Directional cultural change by modification and replacement of memes. Evolution 65:295–300

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Catterall CP, Wyatt WS, Henderson LJ (1982) Food resources, territory density and reproductive success of an island silvereye population Zosterops lateralis. Ibis 124:405–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chace JF, Walsh JJ (2006) Urban effects on native avifauna: a review. Landsc Urban Plan 74:46–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chan K, Kikkawa J (1997) Short communication: a silvereye Dilemma: to migrate or not to migrate? Emu 97:91–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Clegg SM, Degnan SM, Moritz C, Estoup A, Kikkawa J, Owens IP (2002) Microevolution in island forms: the roles of drift and directional selection in morphological divergence of a passerine bird. Evolution 56:2090–2099

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cynx J, Bean NJ, Rossman I (2005) Testosterone implants alter the frequency range of zebra finch songs. Horm Behav 47:446–451

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Degnan SM, Robertson BC, Clegg SM, Moritz CC (1999) Microsatellite primers for studies of gene flow and mating systems in white-eyes (Zosterops). Mol Ecol 8:159–160

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Derryberry EP (2009) Ecology shapes birdsong evolution: variation in morphology and habitat explains variation in white-crowned sparrow song. Am Nat 174:24–33

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. DiBattista J (2008) Patterns of genetic variation in anthropogenically impacted populations. Conserv Genet 9:141–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Edelaar P, Benkman CW (2006) Replicated population divergence caused by localized coevolution? A test of three hypotheses in the red crossbill-lodgepole pine system. J Evolut Biol 19:1651–1659

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Evans KL, Gaston KJ, Frantz AC, Simeoni M, Sharp SP, McGowan A, Dawson DA, Walasz K, Partecke J, Burke T, Hatchwell BJ (2009) Independent colonization of multiple urban centres by a formerly forest specialist bird species. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 276:2403–2410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Evans KL, Newton J, Gaston KJ, Sharp SP, McGowan A, Hatchwell BJ (2012) Colonisation of urban environments is associated with reduced migratory behaviour, facilitating divergence from ancestral populations. Oikos 121:634–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Excoffier L, Laval G, Schneider S (2005) Arlequin (version 3.0): an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evolut Bioinform Online 1:47–50

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Frentiu FD, Lange CL, Burke T, Owens IPF (2003) Isolation of microsatellite loci in the Capricorn silvereye, Zosterops lateralis chlorocephalus (Aves: Zosteropidae). Mol Ecol Notes 3:462–464

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Griffiths R, Double MC, Orr K, Dawson RJ (1998) A DNA test to sex most birds. Mol Ecol 7:1071–1075

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Halfwerk W, Slabbekoorn H (2009) A behavioural mechanism explaining noise-dependent frequency use in urban birdsong. Anim Behav 78:1301–1307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Higgins PJ, Peter JM, Cowling SJ (2006) Boatbill to starlings: handbook of Australian, New Zealand and antarctic birds, vol 7. Oxford University Press, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jost LOU (2009) D vs. GST: response to Heller and Siegismund (2009) and Ryman and Leimar (2009). Mol Ecol 18:2088–2091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kikkawa J (1987) Social relations and fitness in silvereyes. In: Ito Y, Brown J, Kikkawa J (eds) Animal societies—theories and facts. Japan Scientific Press, Tokyo, pp 253–266

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kikkawa J, Wilson J (1983) Breeding and dominance among the Heron Island Silvereyes Zosterops lateralis chlorocephala. Emu 83:181–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Laitinen J, Samarut J, Hölttä E (1994) A nontoxic and versatile protein salting-out method for isolation of DNA. Biotechniques 17:316–322

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Leader N, Geffen E, Mokady O, Yom-Tov Y (2008) Song dialects do not restrict gene flow in an urban population of the orange-tufted sunbird, Nectarinia osea. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62:1299–1305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Luther D, Baptista L (2010) Urban noise and the cultural evolution of bird songs. Proc R Soc Lond B 277:469–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. MacDougall-Shackleton EA, MacDougall-Shackleton SA (2001) Cultural and genetic evolution in mountain white-crowned sparrows: song dialects are associated with population structure. Evolution 55:2568–2575

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Marler P (2004) Bird calls: their potential for behavioral neurobiology. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1016:31–44

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. McCarthy MA (2007) Bayesian methods for ecology. University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  30. Meirmans PG (2006) Using the AMOVA framework to estimate a standardized genetic differentiation measure. Evolution 60:2399–2402

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Meirmans PG, Van Tienderen PH (2004) Genotype and genodive: two programs for the analysis of genetic diversity of asexual organisms. Mol Ecol Notes 4:792–794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Nemeth E, Brumm H (2010) Birds and anthropogenic noise: are urban songs adaptive? Am Nat 176:465–475

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Partecke J, Gwinner E (2007) Increased sedentariness in European blackbirds following urbanization: a consequence of local adaptation? Ecology 88:882–890

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Partecke J, Van’t Hof T, Gwinner E (2004) Differences in the timing of reproduction between urban and forest European blackbirds (Turdus merula): result of phenotypic flexibility or genetic differences? Proc R Soc B 271:1995–2001

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Partecke J, Gwinner E, Bensch S (2006) Is urbanisation of European blackbirds (Turdus merula) associated with genetic differentiation? J Ornithol 147:549–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Patricelli GL, Blickley JL (2006) Avian communication in urban noise: causes and consequences of vocal adjustment. Auk 123:639–649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Patten MA, Rotenberry JT, Zuk M (2004) Habitat selection, acoustic adaptation, and the evolution of reproductive isolation. Evolution 58:2144–2155

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Podos J, Southall JA, Rossi-Santos MR (2004) Vocal mechanics in Darwin’s finches: correlation of beak gape and song frequency. J Exp Biol 207:607–619

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Potvin DA, Parris KM, Mulder RA (2011) Geographically pervasive effects of urban noise on frequency and syllable rate of songs and calls in silvereyes (Zosterops lateralis). Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 278:2464–2469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) GENEPOP (version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J Hered 86:248–249

    Google Scholar 

  41. Rice WR (1987) Speciation via habitat specialization: the evolution of reproductive isolation as a correlated character. Evolut Ecol 1:301–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Riede T, Suthers RA, Fletcher NH, Blevins WE (2006) Songbirds tune their vocal tract to the fundamental frequency of their song. Proc Natl Acad Sci 103:5543–5548

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Ripmeester EA, Kok JS, van Rijssel JC, Slabbekoorn H (2010) Habitat-related birdsong divergence: a multi-level study on the influence of territory density and ambient noise in European blackbirds. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 64:409–418

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Rousset F (2008) Genepop’007: a complete re-implementation of the genepop software for Windows and Linux. Mol Ecol Resour 8:103–106

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Slabbekoorn H, Ripmeester EA (2008) Birdsong and anthropogenic noise: implications and applications for conservation. Mol Ecol 17:72–83

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Slabbekoorn H, Smith TB (2002a) Bird song, ecology and speciation. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 357:493–503

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Slabbekoorn H, Smith TB (2002b) Habitat-dependent song divergence in the little greenbul: an analysis of environmental selection pressures on acoustic signals. Evolution 56:1849–1858

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Spiegelhalter D, Thomas A, Best N, Lunn D (2006) OPENBUGS user manual version 220. MRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  49. Vangestel C, Mergeay J et al (2011) Spatial heterogeneity in genetic relatedness among house sparrows along an urban–rural gradient as revealed by individual-based analysis. Mol Ecol 20(22):4643–4653

    Google Scholar 

  50. Yoktan K, Geffen E, Ilany A, Yom-Tov Y, Naor A, Leader N (2011) Vocal dialect and genetic subdivisions along a geographic gradient in the orange-tufted sunbird. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65:1389–1402

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank three anonymous reviewers for helpful comments improving the manuscript. We thank J. Kruckel for field assistance, G. Fry, A. Leishman, D. Paton, D. Williams, E. Woehler, R. Fuller, and A. Fletcher for assistance in locating and banding, the Australian National Botanic Gardens (ACT), Namadgi National Park (ACT), Glenorchy City Council (Tas), Brisbane City Council (Qld), Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve (NSW), Kogarah City Council (NSW), Darebin City Council (Vic) and Darebin Parklands Association (Vic) for permission to conduct work on their lands.

Ethical note

Procedures were undertaken with the approval of the following agencies: Animal Ethics Committee at the University of Melbourne, Director-General’s Animal Care and Ethics Committee at the NSW Department of Primary Industries, and Wildlife Ethics Committee at the SA Department for Environment and Heritage.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dominique A. Potvin.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Potvin, D.A., Parris, K.M. & Mulder, R.A. Limited genetic differentiation between acoustically divergent populations of urban and rural silvereyes (Zosterops lateralis). Evol Ecol 27, 381–391 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-012-9591-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • Urbanization
  • Silvereye
  • Population genetics
  • Zosterops lateralis