Evolutionary Ecology

, Volume 25, Issue 1, pp 1–11 | Cite as

Linking genetic mechanisms of heterozygosity-fitness correlations to footprints of selection at single loci

  • Jakob C. Mueller
  • Joachim Hermisson
  • Juanita Olano-Marin
  • Bengt Hansson
  • Bart Kempenaers
Ideas and Perspectives

Abstract

Investigations of heterozygosity-fitness correlations (HFCs) are central to the understanding how genetic diversity is maintained in natural populations. Advanced genome-wide approaches will enrich the number of functional loci to be tested. We argue that a combined analysis of the genetic mechanisms of HFCs and selection signals at single loci will allow researchers to better understand the micro-evolutionary basis of HFCs. Different dominance relationships among the alleles at the locus can lead to positive, negative or null HFCs depending on the allele frequency distribution. These scenarios differ in the temporal stability of the HFCs and in the patterns of allele frequency changes over time. Here, we describe a simple theoretical framework that links the analyses of heterozygosity-fitness associations (ecological timescale) with tests for selection signals (evolutionary timescale). Different genomic footprints of selection can be expected for the different underlying genetic mechanisms of HFCs, and this information can be independently used for the classification of HFCs. We suggest that in addition to inbreeding and single-locus overdominant effects also loci under directional selection could play a significant role in the development of heterozygosity-fitness effects in large natural populations under recent or fluctuating ecological changes.

Keywords

Allelic dominance Recessiveness Microevolution Partial selective sweep Balancing selection Fluctuating selection 

Supplementary material

References

  1. Amos W, Acevedo-Whitehouse K (2009) A new test for genotype-fitness associations reveals a single microsatellite allele that strongly predicts the nature of tuberculosis infections in wild boar. Mol Ecol Res 9:1102–1111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andolfatto P (2007) Hitchhiking effects of recurrent beneficial amino acid substitutions in the Drosophila melanogaster genome. Genome Res 17:1755–1762CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Anisimova M, Liberles DA (2007) The quest for natural selection in the age of comparative genomics. Heredity 99:567–579CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Backstrom N, Fagerberg S, Ellegren H (2008) Genomics of natural bird populations: a gene-based set of reference markers evenly spread across the avian genome. Mol Ecol 17:964–980CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Balloux F, Amos W, Coulson T (2004) Does heterozygosity estimate inbreeding in real populations? Mol Ecol 13:3021–3031CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bamshad M, Wooding SP (2003) Signatures of natural selection in the human genome. Nat Rev Genet 4:99–111CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Beaumont MA, Balding DJ (2004) Identifying adaptive genetic divergence among populations from genome scans. Mol Ecol 13:969–980CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bell G (2010) Fluctuating selection: the perpetual renewal of adaptation in variable environments. Phil Trans R Soc B 365:87–97CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Bierne N, Tsitrone A, David P (2000) An inbreeding model of associative overdominance during a population bottleneck. Genetics 155:1981–1990PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Charlesworth B (1998) Adaptive evolution: the struggle for dominance. Curr Biol 8:R502–R504CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Charlesworth B, Charlesworth D (1999) The genetic basis of inbreeding depression. Genet Res Camb 74:329–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. Coltman DW, Slate J (2003) Microsatellite measures of inbreeding: a meta-analysis. Evolution 57:971–983PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. David P (1998) Heterozygosity-fitness correlations: new perspectives on old problems. Heredity 80:531–537CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Depaulis F, Veuille M (1998) Neutrality tests based on the distribution of haplotypes under an infinite-site model. Mol Biol Evol 15:1788–1790PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Ellegren H, Sheldon BC (2008) Genetic basis of fitness differences in natural populations. Nature 452:169–175CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Eyre-Walker A, Keightley PD (2007) The distribution of fitness effects of new mutations. Nat Rev Genet 8:610–618CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Ferreira AGA, Amos W (2006) Inbreeding depression and multiple regions showing heterozygote advantage in Drosophila melanogaster exposed to stress. Mol Ecol 15:3885–3893CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Gilk SE, Wang IA, Hoover CL et al (2004) Outbreeding depression in hybrids between spatially separated Pink Salmon, Oncorhynchus gorbuscha, populations: marine survival, homing ability, and variability in family size. Environ Biol Fish 69:287–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Grant PR, Grant BR (2002) Unpredictable evolution in a 30-year study of Darwin’s finches. Science 296:707–711CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Grueber CE, Wallis GP, Jamieson IG (2008) Heterozygosity-fitness correlations and their relevance to studies on inbreeding depression in threatened species. Mol Ecol 17:3978–3984CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Hansson B, Westerberg L (2002) On the correlation between heterozygosity and fitness in natural populations. Mol Ecol 11:2467–2474CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Hansson B, Westerberg L (2008) Heterozygosity-fitness correlations within inbreeding classes: local or genome-wide effects? Conserv Genet 9:73–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hawks J, Wang ET, Cochran GM, Harpending HC, Moyzis RK (2007) Recent acceleration of human adaptive evolution. PNAS 104:20753–20758CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Hermisson J, Pennings PS (2005) Soft sweeps—molecular population genetics of adaptation from standing genetic variation. Genetics 169:2335–2352CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Jensen JD, Wong A, Aquadro CF (2007) Approaches for identifying targets of positive selection. Trends Genet 23:568–577CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Jensen JD, Thornton KR, Andolfatto P (2008) An approximate Bayesian estimator suggests strong, recurrent selective sweeps in Drosophila. PLOS Genet 4Google Scholar
  28. Kempenaers B (2007) Mate choice and genetic quality: a review of the heterozygosity theory. Adv Study Behav 37:189–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kim Y, Stephan W (2002) Detecting a local signature of genetic hitchhiking along a recombining chromosome. Genetics 160:765–777PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Kimura M, Otha T (1969) The average number of generations until fixation of a mutant gene in a finite population. Genetics 61:763–771PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Kopp M, Hermisson J (2006) The evolution of genetic architecture under frequency-dependent disruptive selection. Evolution 60:1537–1550PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Lesbarreres D, Primmer CR, Laurila A, Merilä J (2005) Environmental and population dependency of genetic variability-fitness correlations in Rana temporaria. Mol Ecol 14:311–323CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Lieutenant-Gosselin M, Bernatchez L (2006) Local heterozygosity-fitness correlations with global positive effects on fitness in threespine stickleback. Evolution 60:1658–1668PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Luikart G, Pilgrim K, Visty J, Ezenwa VO, Schwartz MK (2008) Candidate gene microsatellite variation is associated with parasitism in wild bighorn sheep. Biol Lett 4:228–231CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Macpherson JM, Sella G, Davis JC, Petrov DA (2007) Genomewide spatial correspondence between nonsynonymous divergence and neutral polymorphism reveals extensive adaptation in drosophila. Genetics 177:2083–2099CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Mäkinen HS, Cano JM, Merilä J (2008) Identifying footprints of directional and balancing selection in marine and freshwater three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) populations. Mol Ecol 17:3565–3582CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Merilä J, Sheldon BC (1999) Genetic architecture of fitness and nonfitness traits: empirical patterns and development of ideas. Heredity 83:103–109CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Mitchell-Olds T, Willis JH, Goldstein DB (2007) Which evolutionary processes influence natural genetic variation for phenotypic traits? Nat Rev Genet 8:845–856CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Mueller JC, Andreoli C (2004) Plotting haplotype-specific linkage disequilibrium patterns by extended haplotype homozygosity. Bioinformatics 20:786–787CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Mustonen V, Laessig M (2007) Adaptations to fluctuating selection in Drosophila. PNAS 104:2277–2282CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Mustonen V, Laessig M (2009) From fitness landscapes to seascapes: non-equilibrium dynamics of selection and adaptation. Trends Genet 25:111–119CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Nei M, Rooney AP (2005) Concerted and birth-and-death evolution of multigene families. Annual Rev Genet 39:121–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Nielsen R, Williamson S, Kim Y et al (2005) Genomic scans for selective sweeps using SNP data. Genome Res 15:1566–1575CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Ohta T (1971) Associative overdominance caused by linked detrimental mutations. Genet Res 18:277–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pamilo P, Palsson S (1998) Associative overdominance, heterozygosity and fitness. Heredity 81:381–389CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Pemberton J (2004) Measuring inbreeding depression in the wild: the old ways are the best. Trends Ecol Evol 19:613–615CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Piertney SB, Oliver MK (2006) The evolutionary ecology of the major histocompatibility complex. Heredity 96:7–21PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Reed DH (2007) Natural selection and genetic diversity. Heredity 99:1–2CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Reimchen TE, Nosil P (2002) Temporal variation in divergent selection on spine number in threespine stickleback. Evolution 56:2472–2483PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Rueffler C, Van Dooren TJM, Leimar O, Abrams PA (2006) Disruptive selection and then what? Trends Ecol Evol 21:238–245CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Sabeti PC, Reich DE, Higgins JM et al (2002) Detecting recent positive selection in the human genome from haplotype structure. Nature 419:832–837CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Slate J, David P, Dodds KG et al (2004) Understanding the relationship between the inbreeding coefficient and multilocus heterozygosity: theoretical expectations and empirical data. Heredity 93:255–265CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Slate J, Hale MC, Birkhead TR (2007) Simple sequence repeats in zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata) expressed sequence tags: a new resource for evolutionary genetic studies of passerines. BMC Genomics 8:52CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Tajima F (1989) Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphisms. Genetics 123:585–595PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Teschke M, Mukabayire O, Wiehe T, Tautz D (2008) Identification of selective sweeps in closely related populations of the house mouse based on microsatellite scans. Genetics 180:1537–1545CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Teshima KM, Przeworski M (2006) Directional positive selection on an allele of arbitrary dominance. Genetics 172:713–718CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Thornton KR, Jensen JD, Becquet C, Andolfatto P (2007) Progress and prospects in mapping recent selection in the genome. Heredity 98:340–348PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Tomiuk J, Stauss M, Segelbacher G et al (2007) Female genetic heterogeneity affects the reproduction of great tits (Parus major L., 1758) in low-quality woodlands. J Zool Syst Evol Res 45:144–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Trotter MV, Spencer HG (2007) Frequency-dependent selection and the maintenance of genetic variation: exploring the parameter space of the multiallelic pairwise interaction model. Genetics 176:1729–1740CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. van Doorn GS, Dieckmann U (2006) The long-term evolution of multilocus traits under frequency-dependent disruptive selection. Evolution 60:2226–2238CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. van Herwaarden OA, van der Wal NJ (2002) Extinction time and age of an allele in a large finite population. Theor Popul Biol 61:311–318CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Vasemägi A, Nilsson J, Primmer CR (2005) Expressed sequence tag-linked microsatellites as a source of gene-associated polymorphisms for detecting signatures of divergent selection in atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.). Mol Biol Evol 22:1067–1076CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Voight BF, Kudaravalli S, Wen X, Pritchard JK (2006) A map of recent positive selection in the human genome. PLoS Biol 4:e72CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Watterson GA (1978) The homozygosity test of neutrality. Genetics 88:405–417PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Williamson SH, Hubisz MJ, Clark AG et al (2007) Localizing recent adaptive evolution in the human genome. PloS Genet 3:901–915CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Zeng K, Mano S, Shi S, Wu C-I (2007a) Comparisons of site- and haplotype-frequency methods for detecting positive selection. Mol Biol Evol 24:1562–1574CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Zeng K, Shi S, Wu C-I (2007b) Compound tests for the detection of hitchhiking under positive selection. Mol Biol Evol 24:1898–1908CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jakob C. Mueller
    • 1
  • Joachim Hermisson
    • 2
  • Juanita Olano-Marin
    • 1
  • Bengt Hansson
    • 3
  • Bart Kempenaers
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Behavioural Ecology and Evolutionary GeneticsMax-Planck Institute for OrnithologyStarnbergGermany
  2. 2.Faculty for MathematicsUniversity of ViennaViennaAustria
  3. 3.Section of Animal Ecology, Department of BiologyLund UniversityLundSweden

Personalised recommendations