Skip to main content
Log in

The association among herbivory tolerance, ploidy level, and herbivory pressure in cardamine pratensis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Evolutionary Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We tested whether differences in ploidy level and previous exposure to herbivory can affect plant tolerance to herbivory. We conducted a common garden experiment with 12 populations of two ploidy levels of the perennial herb Cardamine pratensis (five populations of tetraploid ssp. pratensis and seven populations of octoploid ssp. paludosa). Earlier studies have shown that attack rates by the main herbivore, the orange tip butterfly Anthocharis cardamines, are lower in populations of octoploids than in populations of tetraploids, and vary among populations. In the common garden experiment, a combination of natural and artificial damage significantly reduced seed and flower production. We measured tolerance based on four plant-performance metrics: survival, growth, seed production and clonal reproduction. For three of these measurements, tolerance of damage did not differ between ploidy levels. For clonal reproduction, the octoploids had a higher tolerance than the tetraploids, although they experience lower herbivore attack rates in natural populations. Populations from sites with high levels of herbivory had higher tolerance, measured by seed production, than populations with low levels of herbivory. We did not detect any significant costs of tolerance. We conclude that high intensity of herbivory has selected for high tolerance measured by seed production in C. pratensis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agrawal AA, Strauss SY, Stout MJ (1999) Costs of induced responses and tolerance to herbivory in male and female fitness components of wild radish. Evolution 53:1093–1104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aide TM (1992) Dry season leaf production: an escape from herbivory. Biotropica 24:532–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arvanitis L (2007) Plant polyploidy and interactions with insect herbivores. PhD thesis, Department of Botany, Stockholm University, Stockholm

  • Arvanitis L, Wiklund C, Ehrlén J (2007) Butterfly seed predation: effects of landscape characteristics, plant ploidy level and population structure. Oecologia 152:275–285

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arvanitis L, Wiklund C, Ehrlén J (2008) Plant ploidy level influences selection by butterfly seed predators. Oikos 117:1020–1025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bach CE (1988) Effects of host plant patch size on herbivore density: underlying mechanisms. Ecology 69:1103–1117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergelson J, Purrington CB (1996) Surveying patterns in the cost of resistance in plants. Am Nat 148:536–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boalt E, Lehtilä K (2007) Tolerance to apical and foliar damage: costs and mechanisms in Raphanus raphanistrum. Oikos 116:2071–2081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell MM, Richards JH, Johnson DA et al (1981) Coping with herbivory: Photosynthetic capacity and resource allocation in two semiarid Agropyron bunchgrasses. Oecologia 50:14–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carman JG, Briske DD (1985) Morphologic and allozymic variation between long-term grazed and non-grazed populations of the bunchgrass Schizachyrium scoparium var. frequens. Oecologia 66:332–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Courtney SP (1982) Coevolution of pierid butterflies and their cruciferous foodplants IV. Crucifer apparency and Anthocharis cardamines (L.) oviposition. Oecologia 52:258–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Courtney SP, Duggan AE (1983) The population biology of the orange tip butterfly Anthocharis cardamines. Br Ecol Entomol 8:271–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Detling JK, Painter EL (1983) Defoliation responses of western wheatgrass populations with diverse histories of prairie dog grazing. Oecologia 57:65–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer MI, Acra MA, Wang GM et al (1991) Source-sink carbon relations in two Panicum coloratum ecotypes in response to herbivory. Ecology 72:1472–1483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fineblum WL, Rausher MD (1995) Tradeoff between resistance and tolerance to herbivore damage in morning glory. Nature 377:517–520

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Franzke A, Hurka H (2000) Molecular systematics and biogeography of the Cardamine pratensis complex (Brassicaceae). Plant Syst Evol 224:213–234

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie J, Turelli M (1989) Genotype-environment interactions and the maintenance of genetic variability. Genetics 121:129–138

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez JM, Zamora R (2000) Spatial variation in the selective scenarios of Hormathophylla spinosa (Cruciferae). Am Nat 155:657–668

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkes CV, Sullivan JJ (2001) The impact of herbivory on plants in different resource conditions: a meta-analysis. Ecology 82:2045–2058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hay ME (1984) Predictable spatial escapes from herbivory: how do these affect the evolution of herbivore resistance in tropical marine communities? Oecologia 64:396–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedrick P (1999) Antagonistic pleiotropy and genetic polymorphism: a perspective. Heredity 82:126–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (2000) Applied logistic regression. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hultén E, Fries M (1986) Atlas of North European vascular plants: north of the Tropic of Cancer. I. Koeltz Scientific Books, Königstein

    Google Scholar 

  • Husband BC (2000) Constraints on polyploid evolution: a test of the minority cytotype exclusion principle. Proc R Soc London B 267:217–223

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ivey CT, Carr DE, Eubanks MD (2004) Effects of inbreeding in Mimulus guttatus on tolerance to herbivory in natural environments. Ecology 85:567–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaramillo VJ, Detling JK (1988) Grazing history, defoliation, and competition: effects on shortgrass production and nitrogen accumulation. Ecology 69:1599–1608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Järemo J, Ripa J, Nilsson P (1999) Flee or fight uncertainty: plant strategies in relation to anticipated damage. Ecology Lett 2:361–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juenger T, Bergelson J (2000) The evolution of compensation to herbivory in scarlet gilia, Ipomopsis aggregata: herbivore-imposed natural selection and the quantitative genetics of tolerance. Evolution 54:764–777

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kareiva P (1985) Finding and losing host plants by Phyllotreta: patch size and surrounding habitat. Ecology 66:1809–1816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kéry M, Matthies D, Fischer M (2001) The effect of plant population size on the interactions between the rare plant Gentiana cruciata and its specialized herbivore Maculinea rebeli. J Ecol 89:418–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khatri KS (1989) Cardamine L. sect. Cardamine (Cruciferae) in the Asian territory of Soviet Union. A morphological, anatomical and phylogenetical study with taxonomic reconsiderations. Feddes Repert 100:81–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutner MH, Nachtsheim CJ, Neter J (2004) Applied linear regression methods, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill-Irwin, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehtilä K, Boalt E (2004) The use and usefulness of artificial herbivory in plant-herbivore studies. In: Weisser WW, Siemann E (eds) Insects and ecosystem function. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 257–275

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Leimu R, Koricheva J (2006) A meta-analysis of tradeoffs between plant tolerance and resistance to herbivores: combining the evidence from ecological and agricultural studies. Oikos 112:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lennartsson T, Tuomi J, Nilsson P (1997) Evidence for an evolutionary history of overcompensation in the grassland biennial Gentianella campestris (Gentianaceae). Am Nat 149:1147–1155

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Loreti J, Oesterheld M, Sala O (2001) Lack of intraspecific variation in resistance to defoliation in a grass that evolved under light grazing pressure. Plant Ecol 157:197–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lövkvist B (1956) The Cardamine pratensis complex. Outlines of its cytogenetics and taxonomy. PhD thesis, Faculty of Science, University of Uppsala, Uppsala

  • Marquis RJ (1992) Selective impact of herbivores. In: Fritz RR, Simms EL (eds) Plant resistance to herbivores and pathogens: ecology, evolution, and genetics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 301–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauricio R, Rausher MD, Burdick DS (1997) Variation in the defence strategies of plants: are resistance and tolerance mutually exclusive? Ecology 78:1301–1311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNaughton SJ (1984) Grazing lawns: animals in herds, plant form, and coevolution. Am Nat 124:863–886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nuismer SL, Thompson JN (2001) Plant polyploidy and non-uniform effects on insect herbivores. Proc Royal Soc London B 268:1937–1940

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oesterheld M, McNaughton SJ (1988) Intraspecific variation in the response of Themeda triandra to defoliation: the effect of time of recovery and growth rates on compensatory growth. Oecologia 77:181–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Painter R (1958) Resistance of plants to insects. Ann Rev Entomol 3:367–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pilson D (2000) The evolution of plant response to herbivory: simultaneously considering resistance and tolerance in Brassica rapa. Evol Ecol 14:457–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polley HW, Detling JK (1988) Herbivory tolerance of Agropyron smithii populations with different grazing histories. Oecologia 77:261–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polley HW, Detling JK (1990) Grazing-mediated differentiation in Agropyron smithii: evidence from populations with different grazing histories. Oikos 57:326–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prout T, Savolainen O (1996) Genotype-by-environment interaction is not sufficient to maintain variation: Levene and the leafhopper. Am Nat 148:930–936

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roff DA (1992) The evolution of life histories: theory and analysis. Chapman and Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Segraves KA, Thompson JN (1999) Plant polyploidy and pollination: floral traits and insect visits to diploid and tetraploid Heuchera grossulariifolia. Evolution 53:1114–1127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simoes M, Baruch Z (1991) Responses to simulated herbivory and water stress in two tropical C4 grasses. Oecologia 88:173–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soltis PS, Soltis DE (2000) The role of genetic and genomic attributes in the success of polyploids. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:7051–7057

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Schemske DW et al (2007) Autopolyploidy in angiosperms: have we grossly underestimated the number of species? Taxon 56:13–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Stearns S (1992) The evolution of life histories. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Stowe KA (1998) Experimental evolution of resistance in Brassica rapa: correlated response of tolerance in lines selected for glucosinolate content. Evolution 52:703–712

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stowe KA, Marquis RJ, Hochwender CG (2000) The evolutionary ecology of tolerance to consumer damage. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 31:565–595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss SY, Agrawal AA (1999) The ecology and evolution of plant tolerance to herbivory. Trends Ecol Evol 14:179–185

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson JN (1994) The coevolutionary process. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson JN, Merg KF (2008) Evolution of polyploidy and diversification of plant-pollinator interactions. Ecology 89:2197–2206

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson JN, Cunningham BM, Segraves KA et al (1997) Plant polyploidy and insect/plant interactions. Am Nat 150:730–743

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Kleunen M, Schmid B (2003) No evidence for an evolutionary increased competitive ability in an invasive plant. Ecology 84:2816–2823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weis AE, Hochberg ME (2000) The diverse effects of intraspecific competition on the selective advantage to resistance: a model and its predictions. Am Nat 156:276–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiklund C, Åhrberg C (1978) Host plant, nectar source plants, and habitat selection of males and females of Anthocharis cardamines (Lepidoptera). Oikos 31:169–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilsey BJ, Coleman JS, McNaughton SJ (1997) Effects of elevated CO2 and defoliation on grasses: a comparative ecosystem approach. Ecol Appl 7:844–853

    Google Scholar 

  • Zangerl AR, Berenbaum MR (1990) Furanocoumarin induction in wild parsnip: genetics and populational variation. Ecology 71:1933–1940

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank four anonymous referees for comments on the manuscript. This study was financed by the Swedish Research Council and the Baltic Sea Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elin Boalt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boalt, E., Arvanitis, L., Lehtilä, K. et al. The association among herbivory tolerance, ploidy level, and herbivory pressure in cardamine pratensis . Evol Ecol 24, 1101–1113 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-010-9364-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-010-9364-7

Keywords

Navigation