Variation in polyandry and its fitness consequences among populations of the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum
- 168 Downloads
Female mating with multiple males in a single reproductive period, or polyandry, is a common phenomenon in animals. In this study we investigated variation in female mating behavior and its fitness consequences among three genetic strains of the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum. We found that the extent of polyandry and its fitness consequences varied significantly among the strains. In the first strain PRUZ, females mated multiply but incurred costs of polyandry in the form of reduced offspring production. Females of the second strain, NDG11, mated readily with multiple partners and benefited because polyandry led to higher offspring quality. Finally, TIW1 females were resistant to multiple mating and polyandry resulted in lower offspring production but improved offspring quality. Thus, in the first population we observed only costs of polyandry, in the second strain only benefits of polyandry whereas in the third we detected both costs and benefits of polyandry. Possible explanations for such a pattern are discussed.
KeywordsTribolium castaneum Fitness Polyandry Male–female co-evolution
We thank C. Kane, T. Cottom, G. Bajwa, M. Park, and K. Tran for technical assistance. A. Monteiro and anonymous reviewers provided useful suggestions on improving the manuscript. The research is supported by National Science Foundation grant IBN 1030165. These experiments comply with the current laws of the country they were conducted in.
- Andersson M (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
- Attia FA,Tregenza T (2004) Divergence revealed by population crosses in the red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum. Evol Ecol Res 6:927–935Google Scholar
- Birkhead T (2000) Promiscuity: an evolutionary history of sperm competition. Harvard University, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Boake C, Wade M (1984) Populations of red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) differ in their sensitivity to aggregation pheromones. Environ Entomol 13:1182–1185Google Scholar
- Brooker M, Rowley I, Adams M, Baverstock P (1990) Promiscuity: an inbreeding avoidance mechanism in a socially monogamous species? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 26:191–199Google Scholar
- Drummond B (1984) Multiple mating and sperm competition in the Lepidoptera. In: Smith RL (ed) Sperm competition and the evolution of animal mating strategies. Academic Press Orlando, FL, pp 291–370Google Scholar
- Eberhard W (1996) Female control: sexual selection by cryptic female choice. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
- Ridley M (1988) Mating frequency and fecundity in insects. Biol Rev Cambr Phil Soc 63:509–549Google Scholar
- SAS (1995) JMP statistics and graphics guide. SAS Institute, CaryGoogle Scholar