Skip to main content
Log in

Stage-structured cycles generate strong fitness-equalizing mechanisms

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Evolutionary Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For many organisms, rates of reproduction, growth and mortality depend on the amount of resources that an individual consumes. When resource abundances fluctuate through space and time, the realized life-history of an individual can change dramatically depending on the dynamics experienced. Previous studies have investigated the influence of resource-dependent rates on population dynamics, but none have considered how the feedback between non-equilibrium resource dynamics and resource-dependent life-histories influence natural selection and the maintenance of genetic diversity within populations. Here we demonstrate that different patterns of resource dynamics have a strong impact on natural selection in organisms with resource-dependent life-histories. Small-amplitude consumer-resource cycles, lead to lower rates of natural selection than do large-amplitude consumer-resource cycles. Parameterizing the model for a Daphnia-algal system, we demonstrate that resource-dependent life-history can explain the recently published observation that selection among Daphnia genotypes changed depending on the pattern of algal resource fluctuations. The characteristically asexual reproduction of Daphnia allows us to draw a much-needed link to the large body of competition theory that has emerged from community ecology. Our results reveal that the common ecological features of resource-dependent life-history and ontogenetic size-structure generate strong fitness equalizing mechanisms that likely contribute to the maintenance of diversity in natural systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amarasekare P, Hoopes MF, Mouquet N, Holyoak M (2004) Mechanisms of coexistence in competitive metacommunities. Am Nat 164:310–326

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bampfylde CJ, Brown ND, Gavaghan DJ, Maini PK (2005) Modelling rain forest diversity: the role of competition. Ecol Model 188:253–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banks JE (1997) Do imperfect trade-offs affect the extinction debt phenomenon? Ecology 78:1597–1601

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernardo J (1993) Determinants of maturation in animals. Trends Ecol Evol 8:166–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonsall MB, Jansen VAA, Hassell MP (2004) Life history trade-offs assemble ecological guilds. Science 306:111–114

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cerny M, Hebert PDN (1993) Genetic diversity and breeding system variation in Daphnia-pulicaria from North-American lakes. Heredity 71:497–507

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesson P (1994) Multispecies competition in variable environments. Theor Popul Biol 45:227–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesson P (2000) Mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 31:343–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claessen D, Dieckmann U (2002) Ontogenetic niche shifts and evolutionary branching in size-structured populations. Evol Ecol Res 4:189–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Coomes DA, Grubb PJ (2003) Colonization, tolerance, competition and seed-size variation within functional groups. Trends Ecol Evol 18:283–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Roos AM, Persson L (2001) Physiologically structured models—from versatile technique to ecological theory. Oikos 94:51–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Roos AM, Persson L (2003) Competition in size-structured populations: mechanisms inducing cohort formation and population cycles. Theor Popul Biol 63:1–16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • de Roos AM, Metz JAJ, Evers E, Leipoldt A (1990) A size dependent predator-prey interaction—who pursues whom. J Math Biol 28:609–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Roos AM, Persson L, McCauley E (2003) The influence of size-dependent life-history traits on the structure and dynamics of populations and communities. Ecol Lett 6:473–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fargione J, Tilman D (2002) Competition and coexistence in terrestrial plants. In: Sommer U, Worms B (eds) Competition and coexistence. Springer, New York, pp 165–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurney WSC, Nisbet RM (1998) Ecological dynamics. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin G (1960) Competitive exclusion principle. Science 131:1292–1297

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hebert PDN, Crease TJ (1980) Clonal coexistence in Daphnia-pulex (Leydig)—another planktonic paradox. Science 207:1363–1365

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine JM, Rees M (2002) Coexistence and relative abundance in annual plant assemblages: the roles of competition and colonization. Am Nat 160:452–467

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCauley E, Murdoch WW (1987) Cyclic and stable-populations—plankton as paradigm. Am Nat 129:97–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCauley E, Murdoch WW, Nisbet RM (1990a) Growth, reproduction, and mortality of Daphnia-pulex Leydig—life at low food. Funct Ecol 4:505–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCauley E, Murdoch WW, Nisbet RM, Gurney WSC (1990b) The physiological ecology of Daphnia: development of a model of growth and reproduction. Ecology 71:703–715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCauley E, Nisbet RM, de Roos AM, Murdoch WW, Gurney WSC (1996) Structured population models of herbivorous zooplankton. Ecol Monogr 66:479–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCauley E, Nisbet RM, Murdoch WW, de Roos AM, Gurney WSC (1999) Large-amplitude cycles of Daphnia and its algal prey in enriched environments. Nature 402:653–656

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McNamara JM, Houston AI (1996) State-dependent life histories. Nature 380:215–221

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Metz JAJ, Nisbet RM, Geritz SAH (1992) How should we define fitness for general ecological scenarios? Trends Ecol Evol 7:198–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson WA (2004) Competition in structured zooplankton populations: coupling population genetics and dynamics using theoretical and experimental approaches. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Calgary

  • Nelson WA, McCauley E, Wrona FJ (2005) Stage-structured cycles promote genetic diversity in a predator-prey system of Daphnia and algae. Nature 433:413–417

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nisbet RM (1997) Delay-differential equations for structured populations. In: Tuljapurkar S, Caswell H (eds) Structured-population models in marine, terrestrial, and freshwater systems. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 89–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbet RM, Gurney WSC (1983) The systematic formulation of population-models for insects with dynamically varying instar duration. Theor Popul Biol 23:114–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nisbet RM, Gurney WSC, Metz JAJ (1989) Stage structure models applied in evolutionary ecology. In: Biomathematics, vol 18 (eds) Levin, Hallam, Gross, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 429–449

  • Nisbet RM, McCauley E, Gurney WSC, Murdoch WW, Wood SN (2004). Formulating and testing a partially specified dynamic energy budget model. Ecology 85:3132–3139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noonburg EG, Nisbet RM, McCauley E, Gurney WSC (1998) Experimental testing of dynamic energy budget models. Funct Ecol 12:211–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauer JR, Slade NA (1987) Size-based demography of vertebrates. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 18:71–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schippers P, Verschoor AM, Vos M, Mooij WM (2001) Does “supersaturated coexistence” resolve the “paradox of the plankton”? Ecol Lett 4:404–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sebens KP (1987) The ecology of indeterminate growth in animals. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 18:371–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silvertown J (2004) Plant coexistence and the niche. Trends Ecol Evol 19:605–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder RE, Borer ET, Chesson P (2005) Examining the relative importance of spatial and nonspatial coexistence mechanisms. Am Nat 166:E74–E94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svanback R, Bolnick DI (2005) Intraspecific competition affects the strength of individual specialization: an optimal diet theory method. Evol Ecol Res 7:993–1012

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood SN (2001) Partially specified ecological models. Ecol Monogr 71:1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Alex Potapov for suggesting the change of variables (Appendix III) and Caroline Bampfylde for thoughtful comments on an earlier draft. We also thank two anonymous reviewers for valuable suggestions and comments. E.M. gratefully acknowledges support from NSERC operating grants, and the Canada Research Chairs program. W.A.N. gratefully acknowledges support from the Alberta Ingenuity Fund.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William A. Nelson.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nelson, W.A., McCauley, E. & Nisbet, R.M. Stage-structured cycles generate strong fitness-equalizing mechanisms. Evol Ecol 21, 499–515 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-006-9131-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-006-9131-y

Keywords