Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Nuptial gift consumption influences female remating in a scorpionfly: male or female control of mating rate?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Evolutionary Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the scorpionfly Panorpa cognata, males provide females with saliva secretions as nuptial food gifts. Consequently, females derive material benefits and possibly also genetic benefits from multiple matings. Females therefore generally should have a high motivation to remate. Males, on the other hand, do not share this interest, which will generate a sexual conflict over remating interval, possibly leading to male adaptations that prevent females from remating with other males. In this study, I found that mated females were less prone to copulate than virgin females, despite female benefits of multiple matings. Further, I found that the remating interval was significantly longer if the first copulation was long compared to shorter matings. This effect does not entirely depend on copulation duration per se, but on the amount of saliva, that a female is consuming during copulation. These results suggest a mating-induced refractory period and can be interpreted as male manipulation of female remating behaviour mediated through substances in the nuptial gift. Alternatively, receiving large nuptial gifts may decrease the prospective direct fitness benefits from further copulations, and thus change optimal female remating rate. Furthermore, gift size has been shown to correlate with male nutritional condition, which may be an indicator of male genetic quality. Females may therefore benefit indirectly by not remating following copulations involving large saliva gifts. In this scenario, female remating interval would be an effect of cryptic female choice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alatalo RV, Kotiaho J, Mappes J, Parri S (1998) Mate choice for offspring performance: major benefits or minor costs? Proc R Soc Lond B 265:2297–2301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alcock J (1994) Postinsemination associations between males and females in insects: the mate-guarding hypothesis. Annu Rev Entomol 39:1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson J, Borg-Karlson AK, Wiklund C (2000) Sexual cooperation and conflict in butterflies: a male-transferred anti-aphrodisiac reduces harassment of recently mated females. Proc R Soc Lond B 267:1271–1275

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson J, Borg-Karlson AK, Wiklund C (2004) Sexual conflict and anti-aphrodisiac titre in a polyandrous butterfly: male ejaculate tailoring and absence of female control. Proc R Soc Lond B 271:1765–1770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnqvist G, Nilsson T (2000) The evolution of polyandry: multiple mating and female fitness in insects. Anim Behav 60:145–164

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arnqvist G, Rowe L (2005) Sexual conflict. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Baer B, Morgan ED, Schmid-Hempel P (2001) A nonspecific fatty acid within the bumblebee mating plug prevents females from remating. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:3926–3928

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bernays EA, Simpson SJ (1982) The control of food intake. Adv Insect Physiol 16:59–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkhead TR, Martinez JG, Burke T, Froman DP (1999) Sperm mobility determines the outcome of sperm competition in the domestic fowl. Proc R Soc Lond B 266:1759–1764

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bockwinkel G, Sauer KP (1994) Resource dependence of male mating tactics in the scorpionfly, Panorpa vulgaris (Mecoptera, Panorpidae). Anim Behav 47:203–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown WD (1997) Female remating and the intensity of female choice in black-horned tree crickets, Oecanthus nigricornis. Behav Ecol 8:66–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byers GW, Thornhill R (1983) Biology of the Mecoptera. Annu Rev Entomol 28:203–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman T, Miyatake T, Smith HK, Partridge L (1998) Interactions of mating, egg production and death rates in females of the Mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratitis capitata. Proc R Soc Lond B 265:1879–1894

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen PS (1984) The functional-morphology and biochemistry of insect male accessory-glands and their secretions. Annu Rev Entomol 29:233–255

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cook PA, Gage MJG (1995) Effects of risks of sperm competition on the numbers of eupyrene and apyrene sperm ejaculated by the moth Plodia interpunctella (Lepidoptera, Pyralidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 36:261–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook PA, Wedell N (1999) Non-fertile sperm delay female remating. Nature 397:486

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson JL (1986) Prolonged mating in the milkweed beetle Labidomera clivicollis clivicollis (Cleoptera: Chrysomelidae): a test of the “sperm loading” hypothesis. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 18:331–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dziuk PJ (1996) Factors that influence the proportion of offspring sired by a male following heterospermic insemination. Anim Reprod Sci 43:65–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eady PE (1995) Why do male Callosobruchus maculatus beetles inseminate so many sperm? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 36:25–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard WG (1996) Female control: sexual selection by cryptic female choice. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhard WG, Cordero C (1995) Sexual selection by cryptic female choice on male seminal products—a new bridge between sexual selection and reproductive physiology. Trends Ecol Evol 10:493–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engqvist L (2006) Females benefit from mating with different males in the scorpionfly Panorpa cognata. Behav Ecol 17:435–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engqvist L, Sauer KP (2001) Strategic male mating effort and cryptic male choice in a scorpionfly. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:729–735

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Engqvist L, Sauer KP (2002) Amorous scorpionflies: causes and consequences of the long pairing prelude of Panorpa cognata. Anim Behav 63:667–675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engqvist L, Sauer KP (2003a) Determinants of sperm transfer in the scorpionfly Panorpa cognata: male variation, female condition and copulation duration. J Evol Biol 16:1196–1204

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Engqvist L, Sauer KP (2003b) Influence of nutrition on courtship and mating behaviour in the scorpionfly Panorpa cognata. Ethology 109:911–928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleischman RR, Sakaluk SK (2004) Sexual conflict over remating in house crickets: no evidence of an anti-aphrodisiac in males’ ejaculates. Behaviour 141:633–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox GA (2001) Failure-time analysis: emergence, flowering, survivorship, and other waiting times. In: Scheiner SM, Gurevitch J (eds) Design and analysis of ecological experiments. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 253–289

    Google Scholar 

  • Härdling R, Kaitala A (2005) The evolution of repeated mating under sexual conflict. J Evol Biol 18:106–115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • He Y, Tsubaki Y (1991) Effects of spermatophore size on female re-mating in the armyworm, Pseudoletia separata with reference to larval crowding. J Ethol 9:47–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland B, Price WR (1998) Chase-away sexual selection: antagonistic seduction versus resistance. Evolution 52:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ihaka R, Gentleman R (1996) R: a language for data analysis and graphics. J Comput Graph Statist 5:299–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennions MD, Petrie M (2000) Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biol Rev 75:21–64

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson JC, Ivy TM, Sakaluk SK (1999) Female remating propensity contingent on sexual cannibalism in sagebrush crickets, Cyphoderris strepitans: a mechanism of cryptic female choice. Behav Ecol 10:227–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick M (1996) Good genes and direct selection in evolution of mating preferences. Evolution 50:2125–2140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick M, Barton NH (1997) The strength of indirect selection on female mating preferences. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:1282–1286

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leopold RA (1976) The role of male accessory glands in insect reproduction. Annu Rev Entomol 21:199–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis SM, Austad SN (1990) Sources of intraspecific variation in sperm precedence in red flour beetles. Am Nat 135:351–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mercier L (1915) Caractère sexuel secondaire chez les Panorpes: le rôle des glandes salivaires des males. Arch Zool Exp 55:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyatake T, Chapman T, Partridge L (1999) Mating-induced inhibition of remating in female Mediterranean fruit flies Ceratitis capitata. J Insect Physiol 45:1021–1028

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Møller AP, Jennions MD (2001) How important are direct fitness benefits of sexual selection? Naturwissenschaften 88:401–415

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oberhauser KS (1989) Effects of spermatophores on male and female monarch butterfly reproductive success. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 25:237–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker GA (1970) Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Biol Rev 45:525–567

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker GA (1979) Sexual selection and sexual conflict. In: Blum MS, Blum NA (eds) Sperm competition and the evolution of animal mating systems. Academic Press, New York, pp 1–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker GA, Simmons LW (1989) Nuptial feeding in insects: theoretical models of male and female interests. Ethology 82:3–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker GA, Partridge L (1998) Sexual conflict and speciation. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 353:261–274

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parker GA, Simmons LW, Kirk H (1990) Analysing sperm competition data: simple models for predicting mechanisms. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 27:55–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polak M, Wolf LL, Starmer WT, Barker JSF (2001) Function of the mating plug in Drosophila hibisci Bock. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 49:196–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakaluk SK (1991) Post-copulatory mate guarding in decorated crickets. Anim Behav 41:207–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakaluk SK, Eggert A-K (1996) Female control of sperm transfer and intraspecific variation in sperm. Evolution 50:694–703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakaluk SK, Avery RL, Weddle CB (2006) Cryptic sexual conflict in gift-giving insects: chasing the chase-away. Am Nat 167:94–104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sauer KP (1970) Zur Monotopbindung einheimischer Arten der Gattung Panorpa (Mecoptera) nach Untersuchungen im Freiland und im Laboratorium. Zool Jahrb Syst 97:201–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauer KP (1977) The adaptive significance of genetic variability of photoperiodic response in Panorpa vulgaris. Zool Jahrb Syst 104:489–538

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauer KP, Lubjuhn T, Sindern J, Kullmann H, Kurtz J, Epplen C, Epplen JT (1998) Mating system and sexual selection in the scorpionfly Panorpa vulgaris (Mecoptera: Panorpidae). Naturwissenschaften 85:219–228

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sillén-Tullberg B (1981) Prolonged copulation—a male post-copulatory strategy in a promiscuous species, Lygaeus equestris (Heteroptera, Lygaeidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 9:283–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons LW (2001) Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons LW (2005) The evolution of polyandry: sperm competition, sperm selection, and offspring viability. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 36:125–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons LW, Parker GA (1989) Nuptial feeding in insects: mating effort versus paternal investment. Ethology 81:332–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons LW, Gwynne DT (1991) The refractory period of female katydids (Orthoptera: Tettigonidae): sexual conflict over the remating interval? Behav Ecol 2:276–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons LW, Alcock J, Reeder A (2003) The role of cuticular hydrocarbons in male attraction and repulsion by female Dawson’s burrowing bee, Amegilla dawsoni. Anim Behav 66:677–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siva-Jothy MT, Stutt AD (2003) A matter of taste: direct detection of female mating status in the bedbug. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:649–652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stockley P (1997) Sexual conflict resulting from adaptations to sperm competition. Trends Ecol Evol 12:154–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sugawara T (1979) Stretch reception in the bursa copulatrix of the butterfly, Pieris rapae crucivora, and its role in behavior. J Comp Physiol 130:191–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takakura K (2001) Courtship-role-reversal in the bean weevil, Bruchidius dorsalis (Coleoptera: Bruchidae): interplay between male-male competition and cryptic female choice. Appl Entomol Zoolog 36:311–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Therneau TM, Grambsch PM (2004) Modeling survival data: extending the Cox model, 3rd edn. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill R (1976) Sexual selection and nuptial feeding behaviour in Bittacus apicalis (Insecta: Mecoptera). Am Nat 110:529–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill R (1979) Male pair-formation pheromones in Panorpa scorpionflies (Mecoptera: Panorpidae). Environ Entomol 8:886–888

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill R (1980) Competition and coexistence among Panorpa scorpionflies (Mecoptera: Panorpidae). Ecol Monogr 50:179–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill R (1981) Panorpa (Mecoptera: Panorpidae) scorpionflies: systems for understanding resource-defense polygyny and alternative male reproductive efforts. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 12:355–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill R (1983) Cryptic female choice and its implications in the scorpionfly Harpobittacus nigriceps. Am Nat 122:765–788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill R, Sauer KP (1992) Genetic sire effects on the fighting ability of sons and daughters and mating success of sons in a scorpionfly. Anim Behav 43:255–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tregenza T, Wedell N (2000) Genetic compatibility, mate choice and patterns of parentage: invited review. Mol Ecol 9:1013–1027

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tsubaki Y, Sokei Y (1988) Prolonged mating in the melon fly, Dacus cucurbitae (Diptera: Tephritidae): competition for fertilization by sperm-loading. Res Popul Ecol 30:343–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vahed K (1998) The function of nuptial feeding in insects: a review of empirical studies. Biol Rev 73:43–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weddle CB, Sakaluk SK (2003) Ingestion of male haemolymph and mating propensity of female sagebrush crickets: no evidence of a male-derived antiaphrodisiac. Anim Behav 65:83–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wedell N (1993) Spermatophore size in bushcrickets: comparative evidence for nuptial gifts as a sperm protection device. Evolution 47:1203–1212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wedell N (2005) Female receptivity in butterflies and moths. J exp Biol 208:3433–3440

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wedell N, Arak A (1989) The wartbiter spermatophore and its effect on female reproductive output (Orthoptera: Tettigonidae, Decticus verrucivorus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 24:117–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitlock MC (2005) Combining probability from independent tests: the weighted Z-method is superior to Fisher’s approach. J Evol Biol 18:1368–1373

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wiklund C, Kaitala A (1995) Sexual selection for large male size in a polyandrous butterfly: the effect of body size on male versus female reproductive success in Pieris napi. Behav Ecol 6:6–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiklund C, Karlsson B, Leimar O (2001) Sexual conflict and cooperation in butterfly reproduction: a comparative study of polyandry and female fitness. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:1661–1667

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zeh JA, Zeh DW (2003) Toward a new sexual selection paradigm: polyandry, conflict and incompatibility. Ethology 109:929–950

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank Joachim Frommen, Roger Härdling and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on the manuscript and Kim Schmidt, Nicole Schmidt and Monika Kräling for help with laboratory work. This study was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [EN 469/1-1].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Evolutionary Biology and Ecology, University of Bonn, An der Immenburg 1, D-53121, Bonn, Germany

    Leif Engqvist

Authors
  1. Leif Engqvist
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leif Engqvist.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Engqvist, L. Nuptial gift consumption influences female remating in a scorpionfly: male or female control of mating rate?. Evol Ecol 21, 49–61 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-006-9123-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-006-9123-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation