Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The selection of superior plum (Prunus domestica L.) accessions based on morphological and pomological characterizations

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Little attention has been paid to indigenous plum accessions and their distribution in many parts of Iran despite their importance as genetic resources and sources of germplasm. In this study, we used morphological and pomological characteristics to elucidate the phenotypic diversity of 79 autochthonous plum (Prunus domestica L.) accessions. Significant differences were observed among the accessions based on all of the studied characters. Fruits ripened from 23 July to 22 September. Fruit skin color ranged from yellow to black, with the predominant skin color being black. Fruit weight ranged from 4.97 to 42.19 g (average 17.23 g). Fruit flesh thickness varied from 5.70 to 17.16 mm. Fruit weight showed significant and positive correlations with leaf and fruit dimensions, and a negatively significant correlation with tendency to suckering. Principal component analysis showed that fruit-related characters were the most effective traits for differentiating the studied accessions. The Ward dendrogram revealed the similarities and dissimilarities among the accessions with identifying two major clusters. In terms of productive traits and fruit quality, the fruits of some accessions can be used for processing and drying and those of others can be freshly consumed. Finally, the results of this study provide information on the morphological and pomological characteristics of indigenous plum accessions that could be used in the conservation and management of this valuable genetic resource and also applied in plum breeding programs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berkes F, Folke C, Gadgil M (1994) Traditional ecological knowledge, biodiversity, resilience and sustainability. In: Perrings CA, Mäler KG, Folke C, Holling CS, Jansson BO (eds) Biodiversity conservation. Springer, Berlin, pp 269–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Crisosto CH, Garner D, Crisosto GM, Bowerman E (2004) Increasing ‘Blackamber’ plum (Prunus salicina Lindley) consumer acceptance. Postharvest Biol Technol 34:237–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Day Rubestein K, Smale M, Widrlechner MP (2006) Demand for genetic resources and the U.S. National Plant Germplasm System. Crop Sci 46:1021–1031

    Google Scholar 

  • Esquinas-Alcazar J (2005) Protecting crop genetic diversity for food security: political, ethical and technical challenges. Nat Rev Genet 6:946–953

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gourraud PA, Barnetche T, Vidan-Jeras B, Cambon-Thomsena A (2005) Introduction to statistical analysis of population data in immunogenetics. Transpl Immunol 14:245–253

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hammer K, Arrowsmith N, Gladis T (2003) Agrobiodiversity with emphasis on plant genetic resources. Naturwissenschften 90:241–250

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hammer Ø, Harper DAT, Ryan PD (2001) PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol Electron 4(1):9

    Google Scholar 

  • Hend BT, Ghada B, Mustapha Sana B, Mohamed M, Mokhtar T, Salhi-Hannachi A (2009) Genetic relatedness among Tunisian plum cultivars by random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis and evaluation of phenotypic characters. Sci Hortic 124:440–446

    Google Scholar 

  • Horak J, Peltanova A, Podavkova A, Safarova L, Bogusch P, Romportl D, Zasadil P (2013) Biodiversity responses to land use in traditional fruit orchards of a rural agricultural landscape. Agric Ecosyst Environ 178:71–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Ionica ME, Nour V, Trandafir I, Cosmulescu S, Botu M (2013) Physical and chemical properties of some European plum cultivars. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca 41(2):499–503

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson LE, Pascual U, Hodgkin T (2007) Utilizing and conserving agrobiodiversity in agricultural landscapes. Agric Ecosyst Environ 121:196–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Khadivi A, Mirheidari F, Moradi Y, Paryan S (2020) Phenotypic and fruit characterizations of Prunus divaricata Ledeb. germplasm from the north of Iran. Sci Hortic 261:109033

    Google Scholar 

  • Khadivi-Khub A, Barazandeh M (2015) A morphometric study of autochthonous plum genotypes based on multivariate analysis. Erwerbs-Obstbau 57:185–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Khadivi-Khub A, Etemadi-Khah A (2015) Phenotypic diversity and relationships between morphological traits in selected almond (Prunus amygdalus) germplasm. Agrofor Syst 89:205–216

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKey J (1988) A plant breeder’s aspect on the taxonomy of cultivate plants. Biol Zbl 107:369–379

    Google Scholar 

  • Milosevic T, Milosevic N (2012) Phenotypic diversity of autochthonous European (Prunus domestica L.) and Damson (Prunus insititia L.) plum accessions based on multivariate analysis. Hortic Sci (Prague) 39(1):8–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Milosevic T, Milosevic N, Mratinic E (2010) Morphogenic variability of some autochthonous plum cultivars in Western Serbia. Braz Arch Biol Technol 53:1293–1297

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulder MB, Coppolillo P (2005) Conservation: linking ecology, economics, and culture. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Negri V (2005) Agro-biodiversity conservation in Europe: ethical issues. J Agric Environ Ethics 18(1):1–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Norusis MJ (1998) SPSS/PC advanced statistics. SPSS Inc., Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Okie WR, Weinberger JH (1996) Plums. In: Janick J, Moore JN (eds) Fruit breeding, vol. I: tree and tropical fruits. Wiley, New York, pp 559–607

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira EJ, Dias NLP, Dantas JLL (2012) Selection of morpho-agronomic descriptors for characterization of papaya cultivars. Euphytica 185:253–265

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascual U, Perrings C (2007) Developing incentives and economic mechanisms for in situ biodiversity conservation in agricultural landscapes. Agric Ecosyst Environ 121:256–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Peppelman G, Kemp H, Balkhoven-Baart TMJ, Groot JM (2007) Towards high density plum growing – agronomic and economic performance of plum (Prunus domestica L.) on ‘VVA-1’ rootstock. Acta Hortic 734:225–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Qualset CO, McGuire PE, Warburton ML (1995) Agrobiodiversity key to agricultural productivity. Calif Agric 49:45–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Rallo P, Jimenez MR, Casanova L, Morales-Sillero A, Suarez MP (2019) Genetic diversity of stone fruit cultivars preserved on-farm in Southern Spain. J Agric Sci Technol 21:943–955

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramming DW, Cociu V (1990) Plums (Prunus). Acta Hortic 290:1–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Sansavini S, Watkins R (1991) Conservazione ed uso del germoplasma nella coltivazione del melo. Frutticoltura 1:45–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Sosna I (2002) Growth and cropping of four plum cultivars on different rootstocks in South Western Poland. J Fruit Ornam Plant Res 10:95–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Suranyi D (2006) Botanical and ecological description of plum species. Plums, Budapest, Mezőgazdasági Kiadó, pp 7–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Swift MJ, Izac AMN, van Noordwijk M (2004) Biodiversity and ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes—are we asking the right questions? Agric Ecosyst Environ 104:113–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrupp LA (2000) Linking agricultural biodiversity and food security: the valuable role of agrobiodiversity for sustainable agriculture. International Affairs 76:265–281

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Upadhyaya HD, Dwivedi SL, Baum M, Varshney RK, Udupa SM, Gowda CLL, Hoisington D, Singh S (2008) Genetic structure, diversity and allelic richness in composite collection and reference set in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). BMC Plant Biol 8:106

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • UPOV (International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants) (2002) Guidelines for the conduct of tests for distinctness, uniformity and stability, European plum (Prunus domestica L.). TG/41/5(PROJ). https://www.upov.int/meetings/en/doc_details.jsp?meeting_id=4529&doc_id=177458. Accessed 9 Aug

  • Utts JM (2005) Seeing through statistics, 3rd edn. Thomson Brooks/Cole, Boston, pp 166–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitanova I, Dimkova S, Ivanova D (2004) Vegetative and reproductive parameters of introduced plum cultivars. J Fruit Ornam Plant Res 12:257–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Walkowiak-Tomczak D, Reguła J, Lysiak G (2008) Physico-chemical properties and antioxidant activity of selected plum cultivars fruit. Acta Sci Pol Technol Aliment 7:15–22

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ward JHJ (1963) Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. J Am Stat Assoc 58:236–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeven AC (1998) Landraces: a review of definitions and classifications. Euphytica 104:127–139

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Horticultural Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Arak University, Arak, 38156-8-8349, Iran

    Farhad Mirheidari, Ali Khadivi, Younes Moradi & Simin Paryan

Authors
  1. Farhad Mirheidari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ali Khadivi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Younes Moradi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Simin Paryan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

FM, YM, and SP performed the experiments and collected data; AK guided all aspects of the research project, analyzed data, and wrote the manuscript. All authors approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Khadivi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mirheidari, F., Khadivi, A., Moradi, Y. et al. The selection of superior plum (Prunus domestica L.) accessions based on morphological and pomological characterizations. Euphytica 216, 87 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-020-02617-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-020-02617-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation