Molecular characterisation of maize introgressed inbred lines bred in different environments
Establishing detailed information on genetic diversity and relationships among maize (Zea mays L.) inbred lines in a breeding programme help ensure effective utilization of germplasm. Introgression of temperate maize germplasm into 12 tropical elite maize inbred lines using a common donor inbred line and different selection environments might disrupt the heterotic grouping system. Therefore, the objective of the study was to determine the effect of introgression on the clustering pattern of the newly introgressed inbred lines and to identify unique genotypes for breeding. A total of 76 introgressed inbred lines derived through pedigree crosses of introgression of 12 elite tropical inbred lines from three major heterotic groups N3, SC and P with a common donor temperate maize inbred line (08CED6_7_B) were used in the study. In addition to the derived 76 introgressed inbred lines, 26 temperate parental inbred lines and 21 elite tropical parental inbred lines with known heterotic group classification were also included in the study as references samples for heterotic groupings to give a total of 123 inbred lines for the study. Introgressed inbred lines derived from four generations of pedigree selection in three distinct environments in Zimbabwe and South Africa were characterised using 20 SSR markers. The 20 SSR markers proved very effective in discriminating the introgressed inbred lines according to genetic distance and clustering. A total of 83 alleles were detected with an average of 4.15 alleles per locus, and had an allelic diversity of 0.53 and PIC of 0.47. Introgression of temperate maize germplasm into tropical elite inbred lines did not disrupt heterotic groupings, because introgressed inbred lines remained genetically inclined towards the original heterotic groups from which they were derived. However, there were some introgressed inbred lines (14%), which did not show any inclination to any of the heterotic groups. Marked genetic difference noted within and across heterotic groupings for the introgressed inbred lines provides germplasm variation that can be exploited for inbred line development and hybrid formation, respectively.
KeywordsMaize Introgression Genetic diversity SSR markers Heterotic grouping
This work was fully supported and funded by Seed Co Pvt Ltd. We thank all research personnel at various sites for conducting the trials.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare there to be no conflict of interest.
- http://www.dnalandmarks.ca. Accessed 18 Sept 2013
- http://www.genemapperV40.com. Accessed 18 Sept 2013
- Ahmad SQ, Khan S, Ghaffar M, Ahmad F (2011) Gene action for some agronomic traits in maize (Zea mays L.). Crop Breed J 1:133–141Google Scholar
- Ali F, Shah IA, Rahman H ur, Noor M, Durrishahwar M, Khan Y, Ullah I, Yan J (2012) Heterosis for yield and agronomic attributes in diverse maize germplasm. Aust J Crop Sci 6:455–462Google Scholar
- Goodman MM (1999) Broadening the genetic diversity in maize breeding by use of exotic germplasm. Madison, USAGoogle Scholar
- Hallauer AR, Miranda JB (1988) Quantitative genetics in maize breeding. Iowa State University Press, AmesGoogle Scholar
- Liu J (2004) Powermaker V.3.25. http://www.powermarker.net. Accessed 18 Sept 2013
- Nei M (1983) Relative efficiencies of different tree-making methods for molecular data. In: Miyamoto MM, Cracraft J (eds) Phylogenetic analysis of DNA sequence. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 90–128Google Scholar
- Nelson PT, Jones MP, Goodman MM (2006) Selecting among available, elite tropical maize inbreds for use in long term temperate breeding. Maydica 51:255–262Google Scholar
- Pabendon MB, Dahlan M, Sutrisno E, Regalado E, George ML (2004) Preliminary study of genetic diversity of Indonesian maize inbreds collection. In: Srinivasan G, Zaidi PH, Prasanna BM, Gonzalez F, Lesnick K (eds) Proceedings of the eighth Asian regional maize workshop: new technologies for the new millennium Bangkok, Thailand 5–8 August 2002. CIMMYT, MexicoGoogle Scholar
- Prasanna BM (2012) Diversity in global maize germplasm: characterization and utilization. J Biol Sci 37:843–855Google Scholar
- Prasanna BM, Mohammadi SA, Sudan C, Nair SK, Garg A et al (2004) Application of molecular marker technologies for maize improvement in India—present status and prospects. In: Srinivasan G, Zaidi PH, Prasanna BM, Gonzalez F, Lesnick K (eds) Proceedings of the eighth Asian regional maize workshop: New technologies for the new millennium. Bangkok, Thailand 5–8 August 2002. CIMMYT, MexicoGoogle Scholar
- Singh BD (2006) Plant breeding principles and methods. Darya Ganj, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
- Zhang S, Li X, Yuan L, Li M, Peng Z (2004) Heterotic groups and exploitation of heterosis-methodology, strategy, and use in hybrid maize breeding in China. In: Srinivasan G, Zaidi PH, Prasanna BM, Gonzalez F, Lesnick K (eds) Proceedings of the eighth Asian regional maize workshop: new technologies for the new millennium. Bangkok, Thailand 5–8 August 2002. CIMMYT, MexicoGoogle Scholar