, 214:236 | Cite as

Expressional and positional candidate genes for resistance to Peyronellaea pinodes in pea

  • S. FondevillaEmail author
  • M. D. Fernández-Romero
  • Z. Satovic
  • D. Rubiales


Ascochyta blight is one of the most damaging pea diseases. Resistance to this disease in pea is quantitative, being governed by several genes with minor effect. Knowledge of the genes controlling resistance would allow their pyramiding and tracking in breeding programs. In previous studies, a number of QTLs associated with resistance to this disease have been identified. Complementarily, genes differentially expressed in resistant reactions have been identified. However, the actual genes controlling resistance, underlying these QTLs are unknown. Previously, genes with a putative involvement in defense and located into QTLs associated with resistance to P. pinodes, have been postulated as candidate genes. This study wanted to go a step forward, being the first report of candidate genes involved in defense that, besides being located in a genomic region controlling resistance, are also differentially expressed in resistant reactions. With this aim, in this study ten genes previously shown to be induced after infection in the resistant accession P665 were selected and mapped in the RIL population P665 × Messire, previously used to identify QTLs for resistance to this disease. In addition, another gene, that according to other pea maps, could be located into a QTL associated with resistance in this RIL population, was also mapped. Single-marker analysis revealed that five candidate genes showed a significant correlation with resistance traits, being also located in a genomic region showing an increased LOD for the corresponding trait. Furthermore, two of them were in the 2-LOD interval of QTLs associated with resistance traits.


Ascochyta blight Pea Candidate resistance genes Marker-assisted selection QTL mapping Pisum sativum 



This research was supported by Projects AGL2014-52871-R and AGL2017-82907-R co-financed by FEDER.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

10681_2018_2316_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx (13 kb)
LOD values in the surroundings of the candidate genes DRR49a RGA1_1 and EREBP. (XLSX 12 kb)


  1. Aubert G, Morin J, Jacquin F, Lorindon K, Quillet MC, Petit A, Rameau C, Lejeune-Hénaut I, Huguet T, Burstin J (2006) Functional mapping in pea, as an aid to the candidate gene selection and for investigating synteny with the model legume Medicago truncatula. Theor Appl Genet 112:1024–1041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Carrillo E, Rubiales D, Pérez-de-Luque A, Fondevilla S (2013) Characterization of mechanisms of resistance against Didymella pinodes in Pisum spp. Eur J Plant Pathol 135:761–769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carrillo E, Satovic Z, Aubert G, Boucherot K, Rubiales D, Fondevilla S (2014) Identification of quantitative trait loci and candidate genes for specific cellular resistance responses against Didymella pinodes in pea. Plant Cell Rep 33:1133–1145. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Chang MM, Chiang CC, Martin WM, Hadwiger LA (1993) Expression of a pea disease resistance response gene in the potato cultivar Shepody. Amer Potato J 70:635–647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Churchill GA, Doerge RW (1994) Empirical threshold values for quantitative trait mapping. Genetics 138:963–971PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Daniels CH, Fristensky B, Wagoner W, Hadwiger LA (1987) Pea genes associated with non-host disease resistance to Fusarium are also active in race-specific disease resistance to Pseudomonas. Plant Mol Biol 8:309–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Darvasi A, Soller M (1997) A simple method to calculate resolving power and confidence interval of QTL map location. Behav Genet 27:125–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Desaki Y, Kouzai Y, Ninomiya Y, Iwase R, Shimizu Y, Seko K, Molinaro A, Minami E, Shibuya N, Kaku H, Nishizawa Y (2018) OsCERK1 plays a crucial role in the lipopolysaccharide-induced immune response of rice. New Phytol 217:1042–1049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fondevilla S, Ávila CM, Cubero JI, Rubiales D (2005) Response to Mycosphaerella pinodes in a germplasm collection of Pisum spp. Plant Breed 124:313–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fondevilla S, Satovic Z, Rubiales D, Moreno MT, Torres AM (2008) Mapping of quantitative trait loci for resistance to Mycosphaerella pinodes in Pisum sativum subsp syriacum. Mol Breed 21:439–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fondevilla S, Almeida NF, Satovic Z, Rubiales D, Patto MCV, Cubero JI, Torres AM (2011a) Identification of common genomic regions controlling resistance to Mycosphaerella pinodes, earliness and architectural traits in different pea genetic backgrounds. Euphytica 182:43–52. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fondevilla S, Küster H, Krajinski F, Cubero JI, Rubiales D (2011b) Identification of genes differentially expressed in a resistant reaction to Mycosphaerella pinodes in pea using microarray technology. BMC Genom 12:28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fondevilla S, Rotter B, Krezdorn N, Jüngling R, Winter P, Rubiales D (2014) Identification of genes involved in resistance to Didymella pinodes in pea by deepSuperSAGE transcriptome profiling. Plant Mol Biol Rep 32:258–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fristensky B, Riggleman RC, Wagoner W, Hadwiger LA (1985) Gene expression in susceptible and disease resistant interactions of peas induced with Fusarium solani pathogens and chitosan. Physiol Plant Pathol 27:15–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jha AB, Tar’an B, Diapari M, Sindhu A, Shunmugam A, Bett K et al (2015) Allele diversity analysis to identify SNPs associated with ascochyta blight resistance in pea. Euphytica 202:189–197. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jha AB, Tar’an B, Stonehouse R, Warkentin TD (2016) Identification of QTLs associated with improved resistance to ascochyta blight in an interspecific pea recombinant inbred line population. Crop Sci 56:2926–2939. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kao CH, Zeng ZB, Teasdale RD (1999) Multiple interval mapping for quantitative trait loci. Genetics 152:1203–1216PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Khan TN, Timmerman-Vaughan GM, Rubiales D, Warkentin TD, Siddique KHM, Erskine W, Barbetti MJ (2013) Didymella pinodes and its management in field pea: challenges and opportunities. Field Crops Res 148:61–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kosambi DD (1944) The estimation of map distances from recombination values. Ann Eugen 12:172–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kugapreethan R, Wan Q, Nilojan J, Lee J (2018) Identification and characterization of a calcium-dependent lily-type lectin from black rockfish (Sebastes schlegelii): molecular antennas are involved in host defense via pathogen recognition. Dev Comp Immunol 81:54–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lander ES, Green P, Abrahamson J, Barlow A, Daly MJ, Lincoln SE, Newburg L (1987) MAPMAKER: an interactive computer package for constructing primary genetic linkage maps of experimental and natural populations. Genomics 1:174–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Licausi F, Ohme-Takagi M, Perata P (2013) APETALA2/Ethylene Responsive Factor (AP2/ERF) transcription factors: mediators of stress responses and developmental programs. New Phytol 199:639–649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Liu JJ, Ekramoddoullah AKM (2006) The family of plant pathogenesis-related proteins: their structure, regulation, and function in response to biotic and abiotic stresses. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 68:3–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lorenzo O, Piqueras R, Sánchez-Serrano JJ, Solano R (2003) ETHYLENE RESPONSE FACTOR1 integrates signals from ethylene and jasmonate pathways in plant defense. Plant Cell 15:165–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Madrid E, Rajesh PN, Rubio J, Gil J, Millán T, Chen W (2012) Characterization and genetic analysis of an EIN4-like sequence (CaETR-1) located in QTLAR1 implicated in ascochyta blight resistance in chickpea. Plant Cell Rep 31:1033–1042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Matsui H, Nakamura G, Ishiga Y, Toshima H, Inagaki Y et al (2004) Structure and expression of 12-oxophytodienoate reductase (subgroup I) genes in pea, and characterization of the oxidoreductase activities of their recombinant products. Mol Gen Genom 271:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Park CJ, Kim KJ, Shin R, Park JM, Shin YC, Paek KH (2004) Pathogenesis-related protein 10 isolated from hot pepper functions as a ribonuclease in an antiviral pathway. Plant J 37:186–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Prioul S, Frankewitz A, Deniot G, Morin G, Baranger A (2004) Mapping of quantitative trait loci for partial resistance to Mycosphaerella pinodes in pea (Pisum sativum L.), at the seedling and adult plant stages. Theor Appl Genet 108:1322–1334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Prioul-Gervais S, Deniot G, Receveur EM, Frankewitz A, Fourmann M, Rameau C et al (2007) Candidate genes for quantitative resistance to Ascochyta pinodes in pea (Pisum sativum L.). Theor Appl Genet 114:971–984. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Riggleman RC, Fristensky B, Hadwiger LA (1985) The disease resistance response in pea is associated with increased levels of specific mRNAs. Plant Mol Biol 4(81):86Google Scholar
  31. Rubiales D, Fondevilla S (2012) Future prospects for ascochyta blight resistance breeding in cool season food legumes. Front Plant Sci 3:27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tar’an B, Warkentin T, Somers DJ, Miranda D, Vandenberg A, Blade S, Penner G (2003) Quantitative trait loci for lodging resistance, plant height and partial resistance to Mycosphaerella blight in field pea (Pisum sativum L.). Theor Appl Genet 107:1482–1491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Timmerman-Vaughan GM, Frew TJ, Weeden NF (2000) Characterization and linkage mapping of R-gene analogous DNA sequences in pea (Pisum sativum L.). Theor Appl Genet 101:241–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Timmerman-Vaughan GM, Frew TJ, Russell AC, Khan T, Butler R, Gilpin M, Murray S, Falloon K (2002) QTL mapping of partial resistance to field epidemics of Ascochyta blight of pea. Crop Sci 42:2100–2111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Timmerman-Vaughan GM, Frew TJ, Butler R, Murray S, Gilpin M, Falloon K, Khan T (2004) Validation of quantitative trait loci for Ascochyta blight resistance in pea (Pisum sativum L.) using populations from two crosses. Theor Appl Genet 109:1620–1631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Timmerman-Vaughan GM, Moya L, Frew TJ, Murray SR, Crowhurst R (2016) Ascochyta blight disease of pea (Pisum sativum L.): defence-related candidate genes associated with QTL regions and identification of epistatic QTL. Theor Appl Genet 129:879–896. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Tivoli B, Banniza S (2007) Comparison of the epidemiology of ascochyta blights on grain legumes. Eur J Plant Pathol 119:59–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wang S, Basten CJ, Zeng ZB (2012) Windows QTL Cartographer 2.5, Department of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC (
  39. Wu Y, Bhat PR, Close TJ, Lonardi S (2008) Efficient and accurate construction of genetic linkage maps from the minimum spanning tree of a graph. PLoS Genet 4:e1000212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zeng ZB, Kao CH, Basten CJ (1999) Estimating the genetic architecture of quantitative traits. Genetics 74:279–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zhang R, Hwang SF, Chang KF, Gossen BD, Strelkov SE, Turnbull GD, Blade SF (2006) Genetic resistance to in 558 field pea accessions. Crop Sci 46:2409–2414CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Sustainable Agriculture, CSIC, Avda. Menéndez Pidal s/nCórdobaSpain
  2. 2.Department of Seed Science and Technology, Faculty of AgricultureUniversity of ZagrebZagrebCroatia
  3. 3.Centre of Excellence for Biodiversity and Molecular Plant Breeding (CoE CroP-BioDiv)ZagrebCroatia

Personalised recommendations