Abstract
In order to understand if the mechanisms leading to stabilization of hexaploid wheats occurred in early generations after hybridization or accumulated slowly over the evolutionary course, we extracted tetraploids from newly synthesized allohexaploid wheats and characterized the effects of changes in polyploidy levels. Extracted wheat tetraploids (ETW) were developed from two neo-allohexaploids and their five phenotypic traits were compared to the parents. The ETWs displayed few small amplitude differences relative to the tetraploid parent of the synthetics. This suggest that genomic changes that might have occurred during the first three generations of the newly-synthesized wheat allopolyploids had very weak effects on the phenotypes.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arnaud D, Chelaifa H, Jahier J, Chalhoub B (2013) Reprogramming of gene expression in the genetically stable bread allohexaploid wheat. In: Chen ZJ, Birchler JA (eds) Polyploid and hybrids genomics. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 195–209
Chalhoub B, Denoeud F, Liu S, Parkin IA, Tang H, Wang X, Chiquet J, Belcram H, Tong C, Samans B, Correa M, Da Silva C, Just J, Falentin C, Koh CS, Le Clainche I, Bernard M, Bento P, Noel B, Labadie K, Alberti A, Charles M, Arnaud D, Guo H, Daviaud C, Alamery S, Jabbari K, Zhao M, Edger PP, Chelaifa H, Tack D, Lassalle G, Mestiri I, Schnel N, Le Paslier MC, Fan G, Renault V, Bayer PE, Golicz AA, Manoli S, Lee TH, Thi VH, Chalabi S, Hu Q, Fan C, Tollenaere R, Lu Y, Battail C, Shen J, Sidebottom CH, Canaguier A, Chauveau A, Berard A, Deniot G, Guan M, Liu Z, Sun F, Lim YP, Lyons E, Town CD, Bancroft I, Meng J, Ma J, Pires JC, King GJ, Brunel D, Delourme R, Renard M, Aury JM, Adams KL, Batley J, Snowdon RJ, Tost J, Edwards D, Zhou Y, Hua W, Sharpe AG, Paterson AH, Guan C, Wincker P (2014) Early allopolyploid evolution in the post-Neolithic Brassica napus oilseed genome. Science 345:950–953. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1253435
Chelaifa H, Chagu V, Chalabi S, Mestiri I, Arnaud D, Deffains D, Lu Y, Belcram H, Huteau V, Chiquet J, Coriton O, Just J, Jahier J, Chalhoub B (2013) Prevalence of gene expression additivity in genetically stable wheat allohexaploids. New Phytol 197:730–736
Chen Z (2007) Genetic and epigenetic mechanisms for gene expression and phenotypic variation in plant polyploids. Annu Rev Plant Biol 58:377–406
Feldman M (2001) Origin of cultivated wheat. In: Bonjean AP, Angus WJ (eds) The world wheat book—a history of wheat breeding. Lavoisier Publishing, Cachan, pp 3–553
Griffiths S, Sharp R, Foote TN, Bertin I, Wanous M, Reader S, Colas I, Moore G (2006) Molecular characterization of Ph1 as a major chromosome pairing locus in polyploid wheat. Nature 439:749–752
Han F, Fedak G, Guo W, Liu B (2005) Rapid and repeatable elimination of a parental genome-specific DNA repeat (pGc1R-1a) in newly synthesized wheat allopolyploids. Genetics 170:1239–1245
Jackson S, Chen Z (2010) Genomic and expression plasticity in polyploidy. Curr Opin Plant Biol 13:153–159
Jahier J, Coriton O, Deffains D, Arnaud D, Chalhoub B (2017) Revisiting meiotic pairing in wheat synthetics in relation to the evolution of the meiotic system in wheat. Plant Syst Evol 303:1311–1316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-017-1425-8
Kaltsikes PJ, Evans LE, Larter EN (1969) Morphological and meiotic characteristics of the extracted AABB tetraploid component of three varieties of common wheat. Can J Genet Cytol 11:65–71
Kerber ER (1964) Wheat: reconstitution of the tetraploid component (AABB) of hexaploids. Science 143:253–255
Liu C, Yang X, Zhang H, Wang X, Zhang Z, Bian Y, Zhu B, Dong Y, Liu B (2015) Genetic and epigenetic modifications to the BBAA component of common wheat during its evolutionary history at the hexaploid level. Plant Mol Biol 88:53–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11103-015-0307-0
Madlung A, Wendel JF (2013) Genetic and epigenetic aspects of polyploid evolution in plants. Cytogenet Genome Res 140:270–285
Mestiri I, Chagué V, Tanguy AM, Huneau C, Huteau V, Belcram H, Coriton O, Chalhoub B, Jahier J (2010) Newly synthesized wheat allohexaploids display progenitor-dependent meiotic stability and aneuploidy but structural genomic additivity. New Phytol 186:86–101
Ozkan H, Levy AA, Feldman M (2001) Allopolyploidy-induced rapid genome evolution in the wheat (Aegilops–Triticum) group. Plant Cell 13(8):1735–1747
Ozkan H, Tuna M, Arumuganathan K (2003) Nonadditive changes in genome size during allopolyploidization in the wheat (aegilops–triticum) group. J Hered 94(3):260–264
Stebbins GL (1950) Variation and evolution in plants. Columbia University Press, New York, p 643
Van de Peer Y, Maere S, Meyer A (2009) The evolutionary significance of ancient genome duplications. Nat Rev Genet 10:725–732
Yoo MJ, Szadkowski E, Wendel F (2013) Homoeolog expression bias and expression level dominance in allopolyploid cotton. Heredity (Edinb) 110:171–180. https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.2012.94
Zhang H, Zhu B, Qi B, Gou X, Dong Y, Xu C, Zhang B, Huang W, Liu C, Wang X, Yang C, Zhou H, Kashkusk K, Feldman M, Wendel JF, Liu B (2014) Evolution of the BBAA component of bread wheat during its history at the allohexaploid level. Plant Cell 26:2761–2776. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.114.128439
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by a French ANR (Agence Nationale de la Recherche, www.agence-nationale-recherche.fr) 2011 Grant (ANR-11-BSV5-0015: Ploid-ploid-Wheat, ANR-11-BSV5-0015). We also thank the UMR INRA 1095 ‘GENTYANE platform’ (Clermont-Ferrand, France, http://gentyane.clermont.inra.fr/) for the generation of genotyping data.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
The authors declare that the present study complies with the current laws of the countries in which the experiments were performed.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jahier, J., Deffains, D., Huteau, V. et al. Agronomic evaluation of AABB wheat tetraploids extracted from wheat neo-allohexaploids. Euphytica 214, 212 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-018-2293-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-018-2293-1