Flowering period is independent from successful reproduction in Erica gracilis L.
- 73 Downloads
Erica gracilis is an important bedding plant in Northern Europe. Due to self-incompatibility, the development of new varieties was largely based on mutant selection from the predominant variety ’Glasers Rote‘. By crossing ’Glasers Rote‘ with wild types from South Africa in the 1980th, new cross-based varieties arose. Since the cultivation of cross-based varieties, precocious floral withering has been observed more frequently in production areas, suggesting that successful fertilization through open-pollination induces early floral senescence. A cluster analysis of current varieties based on AFLP markers confirmed the close relationship of old varieties and showed the expanded genetic diversity of cross-based varieties. Cross-experiments revealed that both, crosses of ’Glasers Rote‘-based genotypes with new cross-based genotypes and crosses between new genotypes, were successful. In contrast, selfings as well as crosses between old genotypes failed to produce seeds due to inhibition of pollen tube growth. Interestingly, we detected one self-compatible genotype, which provides new possibilities for breeding. No significant effect of open-pollination on the flowering period was observed by studying 16 genotypes, including old and new ones. This circumstance allows the mixed cultivation of different varieties in one production area. However, the flowering period was significantly affected by genotype and environment, suggesting that environmentally adapted varieties with long flowering periods can be bred.
KeywordsAFLP Pollination Cross compatibility Flowering time Floral withering Self-incompatibility
This project was performed in collaboration with Heidepflanzen Peter de Winkel. It was funded through the Central Innovation Program (ZIM) of the German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy (BMWi) under the grant no. KF2043514CS3.
CT analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript, AM designed and performed experiments, AH conceived the study, supervised the design and analysis of the experiment and wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Bahnemann K (1982) Möglichkeiten zur Vorhersage und Beeinflussung des Blühens bei Erica gracilis Salisb. Dissertation, Universität HannoverGoogle Scholar
- Biegler B (2012) Markt Report Blumen und Zierpflanzen. AMI Bericht 9/2012Google Scholar
- BMEL (2014) Horticulture in Germany—facts and figures. Brochure of the German Federal Ministry of food and agriculture (BMEL):1–38Google Scholar
- CPVO (2017) Community plant variety office of the European union. http://cpvo.europa.eu/
- Dohm A (2017) Ornamental plant breeding in a changing competitive environment. Julius-Kühn-Archiv 457:61–63Google Scholar
- Erhardt W, Götz E, Bödeker N, Seybold S (2008) Der große Zander. Enzyklopädie der Pflanzennamen. Band 1. Familien und Gattungen. Eugen Ulmer KG, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
- Hack H, Bleiholder H, Buhr L, Meier U, Schnock-Fricke U, Weber E, Witzenberger A (1992) Einheitliche Codierung der phänologischen Entwicklungsstadien mono-und dikotyler Pflanzen—Die erweiterte BBCH-Skala, Allgemein. Nachrichtenblatt des deutschen Pflanzenschutzdienstes 44(12):265–270Google Scholar
- Hübner S (2012) Callunen in Deutschland: Zwei Marken beherrschen den Markt. DeGa P&H 5(2012):28–31Google Scholar
- Page RD (2001) TreeView. Glasgow University, GlasgowGoogle Scholar
- Preil W, Ebbinghaus R (1987) Die Züchtung von Erica gracilis. LVG Aktuelle Gartenbau-Themen 11:12–19Google Scholar
- Preil W, Ebbinghaus R (1996) Development of basic material– Extension of genetic variability in Erica gracilis by use of wild types from South Africa. Bundesanstalt für Züchtungsforschung an Kulturpflanzen (BAZ). Germany, Jahresbericht 1996:40–41Google Scholar
- Schimmler G (1934) Die Entwicklung der Kamelien-, Azaleen-und Erikenkulturen Deutschlands unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des sächsischen Anbaugebiets. Dissertation. Triltsch, WürzburgGoogle Scholar
- Schlueter PM, Harris SA (2006) Analysis of multilocus fingerprinting data sets containing missing data. Mol Ecol Res 6(2):569–572Google Scholar
- Theobald H (2017) Trendy ornamentals for excited consumers—a challenge! Julius-Kühn-Archiv 457:58–60Google Scholar
- Zimmer K (1987) Erica gracilis Salisb. LVG Aktuelle Gartenbau-Themen 11:5–11Google Scholar