Advertisement

Euphytica

, 214:25 | Cite as

Genome-wide high-resolution mapping of DNA methylation identifies epigenetic variation across different salt stress in Maize (Zea mays L.)

  • Lifang Sun
  • Xingfen Miao
  • Jin Cui
  • Jie Deng
  • Xia Wang
  • Yufeng Wang
  • Yifei Zhang
  • Shuren Gao
  • Kejun Yang
Article
  • 273 Downloads

Abstract

DNA methylation is a vital epigenetic modification for the regulation of plant response to environmental stresses. In order to investigate changes in DNA methylation under salt stress, the levels of cytosine methylation in maize leaves at the seedling stage were estimated using the Methylated DNA Immunoprecipitation Sequencing (MeDIP-seq) method. The profiling of the DNA methylation results showed that a total of 163.27 million raw reads were obtained, with an average 33.06% of which were uniquely mapped to a specific region in the maize genome. Cytosine methylation mainly occurred in CG, CHG, and CHH (H = A, T, or G) sites, and the CG contexts were lower than CHG and CHH contexts. The distribution of highly methylated regions (HMRs) mainly focused on the upstream 2k, intron, and downstream 2k, and the HMR distribution in these elements of YH 200 was higher than control (YH 0) and other samples. In addition, a total of 4402 differential methylated region (DMR)-associated genes were observed between stress samples and control, in which more hypomethylation-related genes were present than hypermethylation-related ones under 100 and 200 mmol L−1 NaCl stress. Meanwhile, these DMR-associated genes were found to be involved in many biological functions by gene ontology (GO) analysis, such as cellular processes, metabolic processes, and signal transduction. Real-time qRT-PCR results showed that the expression of some methylated genes was consistent with the results of MeDIP-seq, while others showed an opposite trend, indicating that DNA-methylated regions did not uniformly affect the transcription of the corresponding genes. These experimental results are expected to improve our understanding of salt tolerance in maize.

Keywords

Maize (Zea mays L.) Salt stress DNA methylation MeDIP-seq Gene expression 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Heilongjiang Provincial Youth Science Foundation of China (QC2015029), “Young innovative talents” project of Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University in China (CXRC2017002), Public welfare industry (agriculture) special funds for scientific research projects of China (201303007), and Doctoral instructor fund for higher education of Chinese educational ministry (20122305110001). In addition, we also thank Zhang H M of Life Science College of Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University for preparing DNA isolation reagents in this study.

Authors contribution

Conceived and designed the experiments: GSR and YKJ. Performed the experiments: DJ, WYF, and ZYF. Analyzed the data: SLF and WX. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: MXF. Wrote the paper: SLF. Revise the paper: CJ. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Supplementary material

10681_2017_2076_MOESM1_ESM.doc (202 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 202 kb)
10681_2017_2076_MOESM2_ESM.doc (36 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOC 36 kb)
10681_2017_2076_MOESM3_ESM.doc (312 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (DOC 311 kb)
10681_2017_2076_MOESM4_ESM.doc (138 kb)
Supplementary material 4 (DOC 138 kb)
10681_2017_2076_MOESM5_ESM.xls (635 kb)
Supplementary material 5 (XLS 635 kb)
10681_2017_2076_MOESM6_ESM.doc (152 kb)
Supplementary material 6 (DOC 152 kb)
10681_2017_2076_MOESM7_ESM.xls (22 kb)
Supplementary material 7 (XLS 22 kb)
10681_2017_2076_MOESM8_ESM.xls (4.8 mb)
Supplementary material 8 (XLS 4903 kb)
10681_2017_2076_MOESM9_ESM.xls (4.8 mb)
Supplementary material 9 (XLS 4891 kb)
10681_2017_2076_MOESM10_ESM.xls (4.8 mb)
Supplementary material 10 (XLS 4898 kb)
10681_2017_2076_MOESM11_ESM.xls (4.8 mb)
Supplementary material 11 (XLS 4900 kb)
10681_2017_2076_MOESM12_ESM.doc (308 kb)
Supplementary material 12 (DOC 307 kb)
10681_2017_2076_MOESM13_ESM.xls (218 kb)
Supplementary material 13 (XLS 217 kb)
10681_2017_2076_MOESM14_ESM.xls (270 kb)
Supplementary material 14 (XLS 269 kb)
10681_2017_2076_MOESM15_ESM.xls (203 kb)
Supplementary material 15 (XLS 203 kb)
10681_2017_2076_MOESM16_ESM.xls (636 kb)
Supplementary material 16 (XLS 635 kb)
10681_2017_2076_MOESM17_ESM.doc (171 kb)
Supplementary material 17 (DOC 171 kb)
10681_2017_2076_MOESM18_ESM.doc (419 kb)
Supplementary material 18 (DOC 419 kb)

References

  1. Angers B, Castonguay E, Massicotte R (2010) Environmentally induced phenotypes and DNA methylation: how to deal with unpredictable conditions until the next generation and afer. Mol Ecol 19:1283–1295CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Baek D, Jiang JF, Chung JS, Wang BS, Chen JP, Xin ZG, Shi HZ (2011) Regulated AtHKT1 gene expression by a distal enhancer element and DNA methylation in the promoter plays an important role in salt tolerance. Plant Cell Physiol 52(1):149–161CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bell CG, Xia Y, Yuan W, Gao F, Ward K, Roos L, Mangino M, Hysi PG, Bell J, Wang J, Spector TD (2016) Novel regional age-associated DNA methylation changes within human common disease-associated loci. Genome Biol 17(193):1–14Google Scholar
  4. Blackledge NP, Klose R (2011) CpG island chromatin: a platform for gene regulation. Epigenetics 6(2):147–152CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Boyes J, Bird A (1992) Repression of genes by DNA methylation depends on CpG density and promoter strength: evidence for involvement of a methyl-CpG binding protein. EMBO J 11:327–333PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Dowen RH, Pelizzola M, Schmitz RJ, Lister R, Dowen JM, Nery JR, Dixon JE, Ecker JR (2012) Widespread dynamic DNA methylation in response to biotic stress. PNAS 109(32):2183–2191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Farooq M, Hussain M, Wakeel A, Siddique KHM (2015) Salt stress in maize: effects, resistance mechanisms, and management. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 35(2):461–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ferreira LJ, Azevedo V, Maroco J, Oliveira MM, Santos AP (2015) Salt tolerant and sensitive rice varieties display differential methylome flexibility under salt stress. PLoS ONE 10(5):1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ficz G, Branco MR, Seisenberger S, Santos F, Krueger F, Hore TA, Marques CJ, Andrews S, Reik W (2011) Dynamic regulation of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in mouse ES cells and during differentiation. Nature 473:398–402CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Fu Y, Gao SR, Yang KJ, Yin KD (2011) Effects of salt stress on several physiological and biochemical indicators in seedling of salt tolerant line and salt sensitive line of maize (Zea mays L.). Plant Physiol J China 47(5):459–462Google Scholar
  11. Gao M, Huang Q, Chu Y, Ding CJ, Zhang BY, Su XH (2014) Analysis of the leaf methylomes of parents and their hybrids provides new insight into hybrid vigor in Populus deltoides. BMC Genet 15(1):1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Garg R, Chevala VN, Shankar R, Jain M (2015) Divergent DNA methylation patterns associated with gene expression in rice cultivars with contrasting drought and salinity stress response. Sci Rep 5:144922.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep14922 Google Scholar
  13. Hu J, Chen X, Zhang H, Ding Y (2015) Genome-wide analysis of DNA methylation in photoperiod-and thermo-sensitive male sterile rice Peiai 64S. BMC Genom 16(102):1–14Google Scholar
  14. Huang YZ, Sun JJ, Zhang LZ, Li C, Womack JE, Li ZJ, Lan XY, Lei CZ, Zhang CL, Zhao X, Chen H (2014) Genome-wide DNA methylation profiles and their relationships with mRNA and the microRNA transcriptome in bovine muscle tissue (Bos taurine). Sci Rep 4(6546):1–17Google Scholar
  15. Huang W, Xian Z, Hu G, Li Z (2016) SlAGO4A, a core factor of RNA-directed DNA methylation (RdDM) pathway, plays an important role under salt and drought stress in tomato. Mol Breed 36(3):1–13Google Scholar
  16. Joel AJ (2013) Epigenetic responses to drought stress in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Physiol Mol Biol Plants 19:379–387CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Jones PA (2012) Functions of DNA methylation: islands, start sites, gene bodies and beyond. Nat Rev Genet 13(7):484–492CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Khan A, Yadav NS, Morgenstern Y, Zemach A, Grafi G (2016) Activation of Tag1 transposable elements in Arabidopsis dedifferentiating cells and their regulation by CHROMOMETHYLASE 3-mediated CHG methylation. Biochim Biophys Acta (BBA)-Gene Regul Mech 1859(10):1289–1298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kidwell KK, Osborn TC (1992) Simple plant DNA isolation procedures. Plant Genomes.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2442-3_1 Google Scholar
  20. Li R, Li Y, Kristiansen K, Wang J (2008) SOAP: short oligonucleotide alignment program. Bioinformatics 24(5):713–714CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Li N, Ye M, Li Y, Yan Z, Butcher LM, Sun J, Han X, Chen Q, Zhang X, Wang J (2010) Whole genome DNA methylation analysis based on high throughput sequencing technology. Methods 52(3):203–212CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Li MZ, Wu HL, Luo ZG, Xia YD (2012a) An atlas of DNA methylomes in porcine adipose and muscle tissues. Nat Commun 3:850.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1854 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Li X, Zhu JD, Hu FY, Ge S, Ye MZ, Xiang H, Zhang G, Zheng X, Zhang H, Zhang S, Li Q, Luo R, Yu C, Yu J, Sun J, Zou X, Cao X, Xie X, Wang J, Wang W (2012b) Single-base resolution maps of cultivated and wild rice methylomes and regulatory roles of DNA methylation in plant gene expression. BMC Genom 13(300):1–15Google Scholar
  24. Liang D, Zhang Z, Wu H, Huang C, Shuai P, Ye C, Tang S, Wang Y, Yang L, Wang J, Yin W, Xia X (2014) Single-base-resolution methylomes of populus trichocarpa reveal the association between DNA methylation and drought stress. BMC Genet 15(1):1–11Google Scholar
  25. Manickavelu A, Kambara K, Mishina K, Koba T (2007) An efficient method for purifying high quality RNA from wheat pistils. Colloids Surf B 54:254–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mao HD, Yu LJ, Li ZJ, Yan Y, Han R, Liu H, Ma M (2016) Genome-wide analysis of the SPL family transcription factors and their responses to abiotic stresses in maize. Plant Gene 6:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Martínez-Macías MI, Qian W, Miki D, Pontes O, Liu Y, Tang K, Liu R, Morales-Ruiz T, Ariza RR, Roldán-Arjona T, Zhu J (2012) A DNA 3′phosphatase functions in active DNA demethylation in Arabidopsis. Mol Cell 45(3):357–370CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Medvedeva YA, Khamis AM, Kulakovskiy IV, Ba-Alawi W, Bhuyan MSI, Kawaji H, Lassmann T, Harbers M, Forrest AR, Bajic VB (2014) Effects of cytosine methylation on transcription factor binding sites. BMC Genom 15(119):1–12Google Scholar
  29. Meng Y, Shao C, Ma X, Wang H (2013) Introns targeted by plant microRNAs: a possible novel mechanism of gene regulation. Rice 6(1):1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Meng D, Dubin M, Zhang P, Osborne EJ, Stegle O, Clark RM, Nordborg M (2016) Limited contribution of DNA methylation variation to expression regulation in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS Genet 12(7):1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rishi V, Bhattacharya P, Chatterjee R, Rozenberg J, Zhao J, Glass K, Fitzgerald P, Vinson C (2010) CpG methylation of half-CRE sequences creates C/EBPalpha binding sites that activate some tissue-specific genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:20311–20316CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Sati S, Tanwar VS, Kumar KA, Patowary A, Jain V, Ghosh S, Ahmad S, Singh M, Chandak GR, Raghunath M, Sridhar S, Chakraborty K, Scaria V, Sengupta S (2012) High resolution methylome map of rat indicates role of intragenic DNA methylation in identification of coding region. PLoS ONE 7(2):1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Song Y, Ji D, Li S, Wang P, Li Q, Xiang F (2012) The dynamic changes of DNA methylation and histone modifications of salt responsive transcription factor genes in soybean. PLoS ONE 7(7):1–11Google Scholar
  34. Sun LF, Wu Y, Su SZ, Liu HK, Yang G, Li SP, Shan XH, Yuan YP (2012) Differential gene expression of maize (Zea mays L) inbred line H99 during somatic embryogenesis. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 109(2):271–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sun LF, Liu TJ, Liu HK, Shan XH, Su SZ, Li SP, Yuan YP, Zhang J (2015) Analysis of DNA cytosine methylation patterns in maize hybrids and their Parents. Biol Plant 59(2):266–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sun X, Sun C, Li Z, Hu Q, Han L, Luo H (2016) AsHSP17, a creeping bentgrass small heat shock protein modulates plant photosynthesis and ABA-dependent and independent signalling to attenuate plant response to abiotic stress. Plant, Cell Environ 39(6):1320–1337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Tolley BJ, Woodfield H (2012) Light-regulated and cell-specific methylation of the maize PEPC promoter. J Exp Bot 63(3):1381–1390CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Uthup TK, Ravindran M, Bini K, Takurdas S (2011) Divergent DNA methylation patterns associated with abiotic stress in Heveabrasiliensis. Mol Plant 4:996–1013CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Van der Does D, Boutrot F, Engelsdorf T, Rhodes J, McKenna JF, Vernhettes S, Koevoets I, Tintor N, Veerabagu M, Miedes E, Segonzac C, Roux M, Breda AS, Hardtke CS, Molina A, Rep M, Testerink C, Mouille G, Höfte H, Hamann T, Zipfel C (2017) The Arabidopsis leucine-rich repeat receptor kinase MIK2/LRR-KISS connects cell wall integrity sensing, root growth and response to abiotic and biotic stresses. PLoS Genet 13(6):e1006832CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Walsh CP, Bestor TH (1999) Cytosine methylation and mammalian development. Genes Dev 13:26–34CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Wang H, Feng Q, Zhang M, Yang C, Sha W, Liu B (2010) Alteration of DNA methylation level and pattern in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) pure-lines and inter-line F1 hybrids following low-dose laser irradiation. J Photochem Photobiol B 99(3):150–153CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Wang M, Qin L, Xie C, Li W, Yuan J, Kong L, Yu W, Xia G, Liu S (2014) Induced and constitutive DNA methylation in a salinity-tolerant wheat introgression line. Plant Cell Physiol 55(7):1354–1365CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Wang W, Huang F, Qin Q, Zhao X, Li Z, Fu B (2015) Comparative analysis of DNA methylation changes in two rice genotypes under salt stress and subsequent recovery. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 465(4):790–796CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Wang B, Zhang M, Fu R, Qian X, Rong P, Zhang Y, Jiang P, Wang J, Lu X, Wang D, Ye W, Zhu X (2016a) Epigenetic mechanisms of salt tolerance and heterosis in Upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) revealed by methylation-sensitive amplified polymorphism analysis. Euphytica 208(3):477–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wang X, Hu L, Wang X, Li N, Xu C, Gong L, Liu B (2016b) DNA methylation affects gene alternative splicing in plants: an example from rice. Mol Plant 9(2):305–307CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Xiang H, Zhu J, Chen Q, Dai FY, Li X, Li M, Zhang HY, Zhang GJ, Li D, Dong Y, Zhao L, Lin Y, Cheng DJ, Sun JF, Zhou XY, Ma K, He Y, Zhao YX, Guo SC, Ye MZ, Guo GW, Li Y, Li RQ, Zhang XQ (2010) Single base-resolution methylome of the silkworm reveals a sparse epigenomic map. Nat Biotechnol 28(5):516–520CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Xu R, Wang Y, Zheng H, Lu W, Wu C, Huang J, Yan K, Yang G, Zheng C (2015) Salt-induced transcription factor MYB74 is regulated by the RNA-directed DNA methylation pathway in Arabidopsis. J Exp Bot 66(19):5997–6008CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Yaari R, Noy-Malka C, Wiedemann G, Gershovitz NA, Reski R, Aviva Katz, Ohad N (2015) DNA METHYLTRANSFERASE 1 is involved in mCG and mCCG DNA methylation and is essential for sporophyte development in Physcomitrella patens. Plant Mol Biol 88(4–5):387–400CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Yan H, Kikuchi S, Neumann P, Zhang W, Wu Y, Chen F, Jiang J (2010) Genome-wide mapping of cytosine methylation revealed dynaSmallc DNA methylation patterns associated with genes and centromeres in rice. Plant J 63(3):353–365CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Yang H, Chang F, You C, Cui J, Zhu G, Wang L, Zheng Y, Qi J, Ma H (2015) Whole-genome DNA methylation patterns and complex associations with gene structure and expression during flower development in Arabidopsis. Plant J 81(2):268–281CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Zang DD, Li HY, Xu HY, Zhang WH, Zhang YM, Shi XX, Wang YC (2016) An Arabidopsis zinc finger protein increases abiotic stress tolerance by regulating sodium and potassium homeostasis, reactive oxygen species scavenging and osmotic potential. Front Plant Sci 7:1272CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. Zhang Y, Liu T, Meyer CA, Eeckhoute J, Johnson DS, Bernstein BE, Nusbaum C, Myers RM, Brown M, Li W, Liu XS (2008) Model-based analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS). Genome Biol 9(9):R137CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  53. Zhu JK (2009) Active DNA demethylation mediated by DNA glycosylases. Annu Rev Genet 43:143–166CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  54. Zhu N, Cheng SF, Liu XY, Du H, Dai MQ, Zhou DX, Yang WJ, Zhao Y (2015) The R2R3-type MYB gene OsMYB91 has a function in coordinating plant growth and salt stress tolerance in rice. Plant Sci 236:146–156CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lifang Sun
    • 1
    • 2
  • Xingfen Miao
    • 2
  • Jin Cui
    • 3
  • Jie Deng
    • 2
  • Xia Wang
    • 2
  • Yufeng Wang
    • 2
  • Yifei Zhang
    • 2
  • Shuren Gao
    • 2
  • Kejun Yang
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Postdoctoral Research Station for Crop Science of Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural UniversityDaqingChina
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of Modern Agricultural Cultivation and Crop Germplasm Improvement of Heilongjiang ProvinceAgronomy College of Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural UniversityDaqingChina
  3. 3.Department of Plant ScienceThe Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations