Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Oil and seed yield stability in a worldwide collection of safflower under arid environments of Iran

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The genotype × environment interaction (GEI) have direct impact on stability of genotypes grown under varied environmental conditions. In the present study, the additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) model was employed to investigate GEI, stability and adaptation of a worldwide germplasm of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) for seed and oil yield. The experiments were conducted at seven environments (combination of location, year and irrigation regimes) using 100 safflower genotypes. The results of the AMMI analysis showed that the main effects due to genotype, environment, and GEI as well as the first four interaction principle component axes were significant for both seed and oil yield. Environment was the major source of variability, followed by GEI. The results of AMMI biplot and stability parameters including AMMI stability value (ASV), sum of the absolute value of IPC scores (SIPC) and genotype selection index (GSI) revealed that genotypes G60 (originating from Jordan) and G90 (originating from Kerman, Iran) had general adaptation under drought and normal conditions. Genotype G21, originating from Greece, exhibited high adaptation and yield under the normal environments. The AMMI biplot determined genotypes G65 (originating from USA) and G40 (originating from Tajikistan) as the superior to be grown under drought stress conditions. The results eventually indicated that the AMMI biplot is an informative method to explore the stability and adaptation patterns of genotypes in practical plant breeding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdulahi A, Pourdad SS, Mohammadi R (2009) Stability analysis of seed yield in safflower genotypes in Iran. Acta Agron Hungarica 57(2):185–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmadi A, Mohammadi A, Najafi Mirak T (2012a) Targeting promising bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) lines for cold climate growing environments using AMMI and SREG GGE biplot analyses. J Agric Sci Tech 14:645–657

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmadi J, Vaezi B, Fetokian MH (2012b) Graphical analysis of multi-environment trials for barley yield using AMMI and GGE-biplot under rainfed conditions. J Plant Physiol Breed 2(1):43–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration: guidelines for computing crop requirements. FAO Irrig Drain Pap 56:41–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Anandan A, Sabesan T, Eswaran R, Rajiv G, Muthalagan N, Suresh R (2009) Appraisal of environmental interaction on quality traits of rice by additive main effects and multiplicative interaction analysis. Cereal Res Comm 37(1):139–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashrafi E, Razmjoo K (2010) Effect of irrigation regimes on oil content and composition of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) cultivars. J Am Oil Chem Soc 87(5):499–506

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brar KS, Manhas S, Hegde DM (2012) GGE biplot analysis visualization of mean performance and stability for seed yield in safflower (Cartamus tinctorus) at divers locations in India. Int J Agric Sci Res 2:77–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Chinnusamy V, Xiong L, Zhu J (2005) Use of genetic engineering and molecular biology approaches for crop improvement for stress environments. In: Ashraf M, Harris PJC (eds) Abiotic stresses, plant resistance through breeding and molecular approach. Haworth Press, Binghamton, pp 47–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Comstock RE, Moll RH (1963) Genotype × environment interactions. In: Hanson WD, Robinson HF (eds) Statistical genetics and plant breeding. NAS-NRC, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Derakhshan E, Majidi MM, Sharafi Y, Mirlohi A (2014) Discrimination and genetic diversity of cultivated and wild safflowers (Carthamus spp.) using EST-microsatellite markers. Biochem Syst Ecol 54:130–136

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ebdon JS, Gauch HG (2002) Additive main effect and multiplicative interaction analysis of national turfgrass performance trials: interpretation of genotype × environment interaction. Crop Sci 42:489–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elfadl E, Reinbrecht C, Frick C, Von S, Rudolphi S (2005) Genotype by environment interaction in safflower grown under organic farming system. 6th int safflower conf Turkey: 236–241

  • Elfadl E, Reinbrecht C, Claupein W (2012) Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L) as a new oil crop in organic farming system: potential and stability in central Europe. Int J Agric Sci 2(6):477–495

    Google Scholar 

  • Farshadfar E, Mahmodi N, Yaghotipoor A (2011) AMMI stability value and simultaneous estimation of yield and yield stability in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Aust J Crop Sci 5(13):1837–1844

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauch HG (2006) Statistical analysis of yield trials by AMMI and GGE. Crop Sci 46:1488–1500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gauch HG, Zobel RW (1988) Predictive success of statistical analysis of yield traits. Theor Appl Genet 76:1–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gheysari M, Mirlatifi SM, Bannayan M, Homaee M, Hoogenboom G (2009) Interaction of water and nitrogen on maize grown for silage. Agric Water Manag 96:809–821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gower JC (1967) Multivariate analysis and multivariate geometry. Statistician 17:13–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Institute SAS (2004) SAS software version 9. SAS Institute, Cary

    Google Scholar 

  • IRRI (2007) CROPSTAT Version 6.1. International rice research institute, Los Bańos, Philippines

  • Jamshidmoghaddam M, Pourdad SS (2013) Genotype × environment interactions for seed yield in rainfed winter safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) multi-environment trials in Iran. Euphytica 190:357–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamshidmoghaddam M, Eskandari Torbaghan M, Mirzaee A (2014) Analysis of genotype × environment interaction for seed yield in spineless safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) genotypes. Crop Breed J 4(1):47–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang MS (1993) Simultaneous selection for yield and stability in crop performance trials: consequences for growers. Agron J 85:754–757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kar G, Kumar A, Martha M (2007) Water use efficiency and crop coefficients of dry season oilseed crops. Agric Water Manag 87(1):73–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khalili M, Pour-Aboughadareh A (2016) Parametric and non-parametric measures for evaluating yield stability and adaptability in barley doubled haploid lines. J Agric Sci Tech 18:789–803

    Google Scholar 

  • Knowles PF (1969) Centers of plant diversity and conservation of crop germplasm: safflower. Econ Bot 23:324–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magari R, Kang M (1993) Genotype selection via a new yield stability statistic in maize yield trials. Euphytica 70:105–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majidi MM, Zadhoush S (2014) Molecular and morphological variation in a world-wide collection of safflower. Crop Sci 54:2109–2119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majidi MM, Tavakoli V, Mirlohi A, Sabzalian MR (2011) Wild safflower species (Carthamus Oxyacanthus Bieb.): a possible source of drought tolerance for arid environments. Aust J Crop Sci 5(8):1055–1063

    Google Scholar 

  • Mc William JR (1989) The dimensions of drought. In: Baker FWG (ed) Drought resistance in cereals. CAB Inter, Wallingford, pp 1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortazavian SMM, Nikkhah HR, Hassani FA, Sharif al Hosseini M, Taheri M, Mahlooji M (2014) GGE biplot and AMMI analysis of yield performance of barley genotypes across different environments in Iran. J Agric Sci Tech 16:609–622

    Google Scholar 

  • Mundel HH, Bergman JW (2009) Safflower. In: Vollmann J, Rajcan I (eds) Oil crop, Hand book of plant breeding. Springer, New York, pp 423–448

    Google Scholar 

  • Mundel HH, Ifuang HC, Burch LD, Kiehn F (1995) Saffire safflower. Can J Plant Sci 65:1079–1081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mungomery VE, Shorter R, Byth DE (1974) Genotype × environment interactions and environment adaptation. I. pattern analysis-application to soybean population. Aust J Agric Res 25:59–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Omidi Tabrizi AH (2000) Correlation between traits and path analysis for grain and oil yield in spring safflower. Sesame Safflower Newsl 15:78–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Omidi Tabrizi AH (2006) Stability and adaptability estimates of some safflower cultivars and lines in different environmental conditions. Agric Sci Technol 8:141–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Omidi Tabrizi AH (2009) Effect of drought stress at different growth stages on grain yield and some agro- physiological traits of three spring safflower. Grain Plant Prod J 25:15–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Pham HN, Kang MS (1988) Interrelationships among repeatability of several stability statistics estimated from international maize trials. Crop Sci 28:925–928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pourdad SS, Mohammadi R (2008) Use of stability parameters for comparing safflower genotypes in multienvironment trials. Asian J Plant Sci 7(1):100–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purchase JL, Hatting H, Van Deventer CS (2000) Genotype × environment interaction of winter wheat in South Africa: II. stability analysis of yield performance. S Afr J Plant Soil 17(3):101–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samonte SOPB, Wilson LT, McClung AM, Medley JC (2005) Targeting cultivars onto rice growing environments using AMMI and SREG GGE biplot analyses. Crop Sci 45:2414–2424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sneller CH, Kilgore-Norquest L, Dombek D (1997) Repeatability of yield stability statistics in soybean. Crop Sci 37:383–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuncturk M, Ciftci V (2004) Relationships among traits using correlation and path coefficient analysis in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) sown different fertilization levels and row spacing. Asian J Plant Sci 3:683–686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss EA (1983) Oilseed crops. Longman, London, pp 216–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Yari P, Keshtkar AH, Sepehri A (2014) Evaluation of water stress effect on growth and yield of spring safflower. Plant Prod Technol 4:101–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeilaghi H, Arzani A, Ghaderian M (2015) Evaluating the contribution of ionic and agronomic components toward salinity tolerance in safflower. Agron J 107:2205–2212

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zareie S, Mohammadi-Nejad G, Sardouie-Nasab S (2013) Screening of Iranian safflower genotypes under water deficit and normal conditions using tolerance indices. Aust J Crop Sci 7:1032–1037

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zeinali E (1999) Safflower, characteristics, production and utilization. Gorgan University Press, Iran, p 144

    Google Scholar 

  • Zobel RW, Wright MJ, Gauch HG (1988) Statistical analysis of a yield trial. Agron J 80:388–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Mahdi Majidi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ebrahimi, F., Majidi, M.M., Arzani, A. et al. Oil and seed yield stability in a worldwide collection of safflower under arid environments of Iran. Euphytica 212, 131–144 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-016-1779-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-016-1779-y

Keywords

Navigation