Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Identification of maize-derived dominant gametophyte factors

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The use of gametophyte factors to protect specialty-type maize has long been advocated, but as of yet, they have made very little impact on preventing pollen contamination due to the complications associated with breeding with these materials, mainly the additive nature of the alleles. A dominant gametophyte factor (DGF) overcomes this problem, allowing for less time consuming production of gametophytic hybrids, but effectively utilized sources do not exist. Tcb1-s, a known DGF, is a teosinte introgression into maize and the leading candidate for utilization, however, it has several issues that limit its effective use in expediting the breeding process for gametophytic hybrids. The use of maize for a source of DGFs may overcome this problem; with the idea years of selection by farmers would likely have minimized any segregation for yield associated with these alleles, making their use for production of gametophytic hybrids an appealing option for modern breeders. Through screening and backcrossing selected maize accessions, we identified DGFs in seven accessions from race Maiz Dulce, which we document here as a starting point for identification of additional maize-derived DGFs. These accessions did not appear to segregate for yield, a marked improvement over existing DGFs. Additionally, we assessed the compatibility of identified maize-derived DGFs from one accession, and showed that, while lines are generally compatible, they are not obligately so since a single accession may segregate for multiple gametophyte factors. There is, therefore, a need to consider the compatibility of pairs of DGFs early in the inbreeding process. Maize-derived DGFs provide a more effective method of producing gametophytic hybrids, making their production economical enough to be brought to market. The use of DGFs has wider potential to benefit any producers interested in preventing pollen contamination with gametophytic hybrids through the same benefits provided to breeders for organic and other specialty systems. In combination with Ga1-m resistance, maize-derived DGFs provide a long-term gametophytic solution to pollen contamination, in a more expeditious way.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brookes G, Barfoot P, Melé E, Messeguer J, Bénétrix F, Bloc D, Foueillassar X, Fabié A, Poeydomenge C, Poeydomenge C (2004) Genetically modified maize: pollen movement and crop co-existence. PG Economics, Dorchester, p 20

    Google Scholar 

  • de la Cruz L, Sanchez J, Ron J, Baltazar B, Ruiz JA, Morales MM (2008) El factor gametofítico-1 (ga1) en híbridos comerciales de maíz de méxico. Rev Fitotec Mex 31:57–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Devos Y, Demont M, Dillen K, Reheul D, Kaiser M, Sanvido O (2009) Coexistence of genetically modified (GM) and non-GM crops in the European Union. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 29:11–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey H (2015) National organic grain and feedstuffs—bi-weekly 11 Nov 2015. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Agricultural Marketing Service

  • Hamilton M, Reberg-Horton C (2013) North Carolina organic grain production guide. N.C. Cooperative Extension, Raleigh

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones ZG, Goodman MM, Krakowsky M (2015) Identification of resistance to the Ga1-m gametophyte factor in maize. Euphytica 206:785–791

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kermicle JL (2006) A selfish gene governing pollen-pistil compatibility confers reproductive isolation between maize relatives. Genetics 172:499–506

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kermicle J, Evans M (2005) Pollen–pistil barriers to crossing in maize and teosinte result from incongruity rather than active rejection. Sex Plant Reprod 18:187–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson O (1952) Non-reciprocal cross-sterility in maize. Genetics 37:101–124

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Perry HS (1945) The Ga gene as a means of reducing contamination of sweet corn. J Hered 36:131–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez JJ, Padilla JM, de la Cruz L, Ron J, Holland JB, Krakowsky M, Goodman MM (2011) Use of gametophytic isolating mechanisms for maize. Plant Breed News 230(1):14

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellhausen EJ, Roberts LM, Hernandez X, Mangelsdorf PC (1952) Races of maize in Mexico. Their origin, characteristics and distribution. Bussey Institution, Harvard University

  • Ziegler KE (2001) Popcorn. In: Hallauer A (ed) Specialty corns, 2nd edn. CRC Press, New York, pp 220–228

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

National Institute for Food and Agriculture (NIFA) (#2012-51300-20024). Clif Bar Family Foundation for their support of the Seed Matters Fellowship in Plant Breeding supporting Zachary. Jose de Jesus Sanchez, University of Guadalajara. Jerry Kermicle, University of Wisconsin.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zachary G. Jones.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jones, Z.G., Goodman, M.M. & Krakowsky, M.D. Identification of maize-derived dominant gametophyte factors. Euphytica 209, 63–69 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-016-1635-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-016-1635-0

Keywords

Navigation