Skip to main content
Log in

Meiotic chromosome pairing in intergeneric hybrids of colchicaceous ornamentals revealed by genomic in situ hybridization (GISH)

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Diploid and triploid intergeneric hybrids obtained by crosses among Gloriosa superba ‘Lutea’ (2n = 2x = 22), G. ‘Marron Gold’ (2n = 4x = 44), Littonia modesta (2n = 2x = 22), and Sandersonia aurantiaca (2n = 2x = 24) were analyzed for their meiotic chromosome pairing in pollen mother cells by genomic in situ hybridization (GISH) with digoxigenin-labeled total DNA of one parent as probe. Chromosomes from each parent could be clearly distinguished in pollen mother cells of all the five intergeneric hybrids by GISH. For three diploid hybrids, L. modesta × G. superba ‘Lutea’ (2n = 2x = 22), L. modesta × S. aurantiaca (2n = 2x = 23) and S. aurantiaca × G. superba ‘Lutea’ (2n = 2x = 23), 0.04−0.27 autosyndetic bivalents (intragenomic pairing of non-homologous chromosomes) and 0.13−0.36 allosyndetic bivalents (intergenomic chromosome pairing) were observed per pollen mother cell, indicating that there are some homologous chromosomal regions within each genome and among the genomes of Gloriosa, Littonia and Sandersonia. Differences in the average number of allosyndetic bivalents per pollen mother cell among different genome combinations may reflect the evolutionary distances among the three genera, and Gloriosa and Littonia may be closely related to each other, while Sandersonia may have relatively distant relationships with Gloriosa and Littonia. For two triploid hybrids, L. modesta × G. ‘Marron Gold’ (2n = 3x = 33) and S. aurantiaca × G. ‘Marron Gold’ (2n = 3x = 34), no allosyndetic bivalents were observed. Based on the results obtained in the present study, possible utilization of the diploid and triploid intergeneric hybrids for further breeding of colchicaceous ornamentals is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amano J (2008) Studies on intergeneric hybridization among colchicaceous ornamentals. PhD Thesis, Niigata University, Japan (in Japanese with English summary)

  • Amano J, Kuwayama S, Mizuta Y, Oomiya T, Nakamura T, Nakano M (2007) Early identification of intra- and intergeneric hybrids among colchicaceous ornamentals, Gloriosa spp., Littonia modesta Hook. and Sandersonia aurantiaca Hook., by flow cytometry and random amplified polymorphic DNA analyses. J Japan Soc Hort Sci 76:73–78

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Amano J, Kuwayama S, Mizuta Y, Godo T, Okuno H, Nakano M (2008) Morphological characterization of three intergeneric hybrids among Gloriosa superba ‘Lutea’, Littonia modesta and Sandersonia aurantiaca (Colchicaceae). Hort Sci 43:115–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Amano J, Nakazawa D, Kuwayama S, Mizuta Y, Okuno H, Watanabe Y, Godo T, Han D-S, Nakano M (2009) Intergeneric hybridization among colchicaceous ornamentals, Gloriosa spp., Littonia modesta and Sandersonia aurantiaca via ovule culture. Plant Biotechnol 26:535–541

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barba-Gonzalez R, Miller CT, Ramanna MS, Van Tuyl JM (2006) Nitrous oxide (N2O) induces 2n gametes in sterile F1 hybrids between Oriental × Asiatic lily (Lilium) hybrids and leads to intergenomic recombination. Euphytica 148:303–309

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cao M, Sleper DA, Dong F, Jiang J (2000) Genomic in situ hybridization (GISH) reveals high chromosome pairing affinity between Lolium perenne and Festuca mairei. Genome 43:398–403

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlgren RMT, Clifford HT, Yeo PF (1985) The families of monocotyledons. Springer-Verlag, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn BL, Lindstrom JT (2007) Oryzalin-induced chromosome doubling in Buddleja to facilitate interspecific hybridization. Hort Sci 42:1326–1328

    Google Scholar 

  • Ge X-H, Li Z-Y (2007) Intra- and intergenomic homology of B-genome chromosomes in trigenomic combinations of the cultivated Brassica species revealed by GISH analysis. Chromosom Res 15:849–861

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hasegawa Y, Nukui S, Okazaki K (2013) Production of unreduced male and female gametes in hybrid lilies by high temperature treatment. Breed Sci 15(suppl. 2):114 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Isshiki A, Taura T (2003) Fertility restoration of hybrids between Solanum melongena L. and S. aethiopicum L. Gilo Group by chromosome doubling and cytoplasmic effect on pollen fertility. Euphytica 134:195–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ji Y, Pertuze R, Chetelat RT (2004) Genome differenciation by GISH in interspecific and intergeneric hybrids of tomato and related nightshades. Chromosom Res 12:107–116

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kamstra SA, Kuipers AGJ, De Jeu MJ, Ramanna MS, Jacobsen E (1999) The extent and position of homoeologous recombination in a distant hybrid of Alstromeria: a molecular cytogenetic assessment of first generation backcross progenies. Chromosoma 108:52–63

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kuwayama S, Nakamura T, Mizuta Y, Oomiya T, Nakano M (2005) Cross-compatibility in interspecific and intergeneric hybridization among the Colchicaceous ornamentals. Gloriosa spp., Littonia modesta and Sandersonia aurantiaca. Acta Hort 673:421–427

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lim KB, Ramanna MS, Jacobsen E, Van Tuyl JM (2003) Evaluation of BC2 progenies derived from 3x−2x and 3x−4x crosses of Lilium hybrids: a GISH analysis. Theor Appl Genet 106:568–574

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lu M, Zhang P, Kang X (2013) Induction of 2n female gametes in Populus adenopoda Maxim by high temperature exposure during female gametophyte development. Breed Sci 63:96–103

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Marasek A, Hasterok R, Wiejacha K, Orlikowska T (2004) Determination by GISH and FISH of hybrid status in Lilium. Hereditas 140:1–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Molnár I, Molnár-Láng M (2010) GISH reveals different levels of meiotic pairing with wheat for individual Aegilops biuncialis chromosomes. Biol Plant 54:259–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura T, Kuwayama S, Tanaka S, Oomiya T, Saito H, Nakano M (2005) Production of intergeneric hybrid plants between Sandersonia aurantiaca and Gloriosa rothchildiana via ovule culture (Colchicaceae). Euphytica 142:283–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakazawa D, Kishimoto T, Sato T, Saito T, Amano J, Kuwayama S, Okuno H, Godo T, Watanabe Y, Han D-S, Nakano M (2011) Genomic in situ hybridization (GISH) analysis of intergeneric hybrids in Colchicaceae. Euphytica 181:197–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordenstam B (1998) Colchicaceae. In: Kubitzki K (ed) The families and genera of vascular plants, vol 3. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 175–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Parokonny AS, Marshall JA, Bennett MD, Cocking EC, Davey MR, Power JB (1997) Homoeologous paring and recombination in backcross derivatives of tomato somatic hybrids [Lycopersicon esculentum (+) L. peruvianum]. Theor Appl Genet 94:713–723

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pendinen G, Spooner DM, Jiang J, Gavrilenko T (2012) Genomic in situ hybridization reveals both auto- and allopolyploid origins of different North and Central American hexaploid potato (Solanum sect. Petota) species. Genome 55:407–415

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ramanna MS, Jacobsen E (2003) Relevance of sexual polyploidization for crop improvement—a review. Euphytica 133:3–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers SO, Bendich AJ (1985) Extraction of DNA from milligram amounts of fresh, herbarium and mummified plant tissues. Plant Mol Biol 5:69–76

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzacher T, Leitch AR, Bennett MD, Heslop-Harrison JS (1989) In situ localization of parental genomes in a wide hybrid. Ann Bot 64:315–324

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Tuyl JM (1989) Research on mitotic and meiotic polyploidization in lily breeding. Herbertia 45:97–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Tuyl JM, Lim KB (2003) Interspecific hybridization and polyploidizition as tools in ornamental plant breeding. Acta Hort 612:13–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Tuyl JM, Meijer H, Van Diën MP (1992) The use of oryzalin as an alternative for colchicine in in vitro chromosome doubling of Lilium and Nerine. Acta Hort 325:625–630

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinnersten A, Reeves G (2003) Phylogenetic relationships within Colchicaceae. Am J Bot 90:1455–1462

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vu HQ, Yoshimatsu Y, Khrustaleva LI, Yamauchi N, Shigyo M (2012) Alien genes introgression and development of alien monosomic addition lines from a threatened species, Allium roylei Stearn, to Allium cepa L. Theor Appl Genet 124:1241–1257

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yao X-C, Ge X-H, Chen J-P, Li Z-Y (2010) Intra- and intergenomic chromosome pairings revealed by dual-color GISH in trigenomic hybrids of Brassica juncea and B. carinata with B. maurorum. Genome 53:14–22

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou S, Ramanna MS, Visser RGF, Van Tuyl JM (2008) Genome composition of triploid lily cultivars derived from sexual polyploidization of Longiflorum × Asiatic hybrids (Lilium). Euphytica 160:207–215

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (No. 20580023) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masaru Nakano.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kishimoto, T., Yamakawa, M., Nakazawa, D. et al. Meiotic chromosome pairing in intergeneric hybrids of colchicaceous ornamentals revealed by genomic in situ hybridization (GISH). Euphytica 200, 251–257 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-014-1152-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-014-1152-y

Keywords

Navigation