Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Genetic differences in root mass of Lolium perenne varieties under field conditions

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although grasses have dense rooting systems, nutrient uptake and productivity can be increased, and N-leaching reduced, if rooting is further improved. The variation in root mass of 16 varieties of Lolium perenne was studied under field conditions in two experiments on sandy soil in The Netherlands. The chosen varieties differed in genetic and aboveground characteristics such as ploidy, productivity and grass cover. Root dry matter (RDM) was measured in the 0–8, 8–16 and 16–24 cm soil layers. In summary, we found that RDM of perennial ryegrass differed significantly between varieties under field conditions. These differences were not linked to grass yield, which indicates that it is possible to select perennial ryegrass varieties that combine high aboveground productivity with high RDM. In the first experiment, which was managed by cutting, diploid varieties had higher RDM than tetraploid varieties. Grand mean RDM in the second experiment, which was managed by cutting as well as grazing, was lower than in the first experiment. In this experiment, total RDM was not influenced by ploidy but by grass cover type: high grass cover types had higher RDM. Differences in management between the two experiments possibly explain the differences in RDM and in the influence of chosen characteristics on RDM. Considering challenges in the areas of climate change, water availability, pollution and soil degradation, grass varieties with improved root systems could significantly contribute to a more efficient use of nutrients and water, erosion control, soil improvement and carbon sequestration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abberton MT, Marshall AH, Humphreys MW, Macduff JH, Collins RP, Marley CL (2008) Genetic improvement of forage species to reduce the environmental impact of temperate livestock grazing systems. Adv Agron 98:311–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews RE, Newman EI (1970) Root intensity and competition for nutrients. Oecol Plant 5:319–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson D, Black KE, Dawson A, Dunsiger Z, Watson CA, Wilson SA (2005) Prospects, advantages and limitations of future crop production systems dependent upon the management of soil processes. Ann Appl Biol 146:203–215

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baan Hofman T, Ennik GC (1980) Investigation into plant characters affecting the competitive ability of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.). Neth J Agric Sci 28:97–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonos SA, Rush D, Hignight K, Meyer WA (2004) Selection for deep root production in tall fescue and perennial Ryegrass. Crop Sci 44:1770–1775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouma TJ, Nielsen KL, Koutstaal B (2000) Sample preparation and scanning protocol for computerised analysis of root length and diameter. Plant Soil 218:185–196

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bowman DC, Devitt DA, Engelke MC, Rufty TW (1998) Root architecture affects nitrate leaching from bentgrass turf. Crop Sci 38:1633–1639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bronick CJ, Lal R (2005) Soil structure and management: a review. Geoderma 124:3–22

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cougnon M, Deru J, Van Eekeren N, Baert J, Reheul D (2013) Root depth and biomass of tall fescue vs. perennial ryegrass. Grassl Sci Eur 18:285–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Crush JR, Easton HS and Waller JE (2006) Genetic variation in perennial ryegrass for root profile characteristics. In: Mercer CF (ed) New Zealand Grassland Association Research and Practice Series No. 12. New Zealand Grassland Association, Dunedin, pp 63–65

  • Crush JR, Easton HS, Waller JE, Hume DE, Faville MJ (2007) Genotypic variation in patterns of root distribution, nitrate interception and response to moisture stress of a perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) mapping population. Grass Forage Sci 62:265–273

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crush JR, Nichols SN, Easton HS, Ouyang L, Hume DE (2009) Comparison between wild populations and bred perennial ryegrasses for root growth and root/shoot partitioning. N Z J Agric Res 52:161–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson RL (1969) Effects of soil nutrients and moisture on root/shoot ratios in Lolium perenne L and Trifolium repens L. Ann Bot 33:571–577

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson LA, Thornton B, Pratt SM, Paterson E (2003) Morphological and topological responses of roots to defoliation and nitrogen supply in Lolium perenne and Festuca ovina. New Phytol 161:811–818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deinum B (1985) Root mass of grass swards in different grazing systems. Neth J Agric Sci 33:377–384

    Google Scholar 

  • Deru J, Van Eekeren N, De Boer H (2010) Rooting of grassland: a literature review on nutrient uptake in relation to rooting depth and density, and on potential measures to stimulate deep and dense rooting of grass (in Dutch, English summary). Louis Bolk Institute, Driebergen-Rijsenburg, p 63

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunbabin V, Diggle A, Rengel Z (2003) Is there an optimal root architecture for nitrate capture in leaching environments? Plant Cell Environ 26:835–844

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ennik GC, Baan Hofman T (1983) Variation in the root mass of ryegrass types and its ecological consequences. Neth J Agric Sci 31:325–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Ennik GC, Gillet M, Sibma L (1980) Effect of high nitrogen supply on sward deterioration and root mass. In: Prins WH, Arnol GH (eds) The role of nitrogen in intensive grassland production. Pudoc, Wageningen, pp 67–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans PS (1971) Root growth of Lolium perenne L. 2. Effects of defoliation and shading. N Z J Agric Res 14:552–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans PS (1972) Root growth of Lolium perenne L. 3. Investigation of mechanism of defoliation-induced suppression of elongation. N Z J Agric Res 15:347–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairley RI (1985) Grass root production in restored soil following opencast mining. In: Fitter AH, Atkinson D, Read DJ, Usher MB (1985) Ecological interactions in soil. British Ecological Society, London, special publication, vol 4, pp 81-85

  • Forde B, Lorenzo H (2001) The nutritional control of root development. Plant Soil 232:51–68

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gales K (1979) Effects of water supply on partitioning of dry matter between roots and shoots in Lolium perenne. J Appl Ecol 16:863–877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garwood EA, Sinclair J (1979) Water-use and root distribution of grass species. J Sci Food Agric 29:834

    Google Scholar 

  • He ZL, Baligar VC, Martens DC, Ritchey KD, Elrashidi MA (1999) Relationship of ryegrass growth to extractable phosphorus in acidic soil amended with phosphate rock, coal combustion by-products, limestone and cellulose. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 30(3&4):457–470

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hodge A, Robinson D, Griffiths BS, Fitter AH (1999) Why plants bother: root proliferation results in increased nitrogen capture from an organic patch when two grasses compete. Plant Cell Environ 22:811–820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoogerkamp M, Rogaar H, Eysakkers HJP (1983) Effects of earthworms on grassland on recently reclaimed polder soils in the Netherlands. In: Satchell JE (ed) Earthworm ecology: from Darwin to vermiculture. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 85–105

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Houlbrooke DJ, Thom ER, Chapman R, McLay CDA (1997) A study of the effects of soil bulk density on root and shoot growth of different ryegrass lines. N Z J Agric Res 40:429–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson RB, Canadell J, Ehleringer JR, Mooney HA, Sala OE, Schulze ED (1996) A global analysis of root distribution for terrestrial biomes. Oecologia 108:389–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kutschera L, Lichtenegger E, Sobotik M (2009) Wurzelatlas der Kulturpflanzen gemässiger Gebiete mit Arten des Feldgemüsebaues. 7. Band. Frankfurt am Main, DLG-Verlag

  • Lynch JP (2007) Roots of the Second Green Revolution. Aust J Bot 55:493–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moir JL, Edwards GR, Berry LN (2012) Nitrogen uptake and leaching loss of thirteen temperate grass species under high N loading. Grass Forage Sci 68:313–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell CL (1977) Effect of phosphate fertilizer and plant density on phosphate inflow into ryegrass roots in soil. Plant Soil 47:383–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson D, Linehan DJ, Caul S (1991) What limits nitrate uptake from soil? Plant Cell Environ 14:77–85

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scheu S (2003) Effects of earthworms on plant growth: patterns and perspectives. Pedobiologia 47:846–856

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow VO, White TA (2013) Process-based modelling to understand which ryegrass characteristics can increase production and decrease leaching in grazed grass–legume pastures. Crop Pasture Sci 64:265–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sprangers JTCM (1999) Vegetation dynamics and erosion resistance of sea dyke grassland. PhD thesis, Wageningen Agricultural University, Wageningen

  • Steingrobe B, Schmid H, Claassen N (2000) The use of the ingrowth core method for measuring root production of arable crops—influence of soil conditions inside the ingrowth core on root growth. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 163:617–622

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Troughton A (1980) Production of root axes and leaf elongation in perennial ryegrass in relation to dryness of the upper soil layer. J Agric Sci 95:533–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Eekeren N, Bommelé L, Bloem J, Schouten AJ, Rutgers M, De Goede R, Reheul D, Brussaard L (2008) Soil Biological quality after 36 years of ley-arable cropping, permanent grassland and permanent arable cropping. Appl Soil Ecol 40:432–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Eekeren N, Bos M, De Wit J, Keidel H, Bloem J (2010) Effect of different grass species mixtures on soil quality in relation to root biomass and grass yield. Appl Soil Ecol 45:275–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verloop K (2013) Limits of effective nutrient management in dairy farming: analyses of experimental farm De Marke. PhD thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen

  • White TA, Snow VO (2012) A modelling analysis to identify plant traits for enhanced water-use efficiency of pasture. Crop Pasture Sci 63:63–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was part of the project Bufferboeren, financed by the following Dutch institutions: Agricultural Innovation Bureau (LIB), Dairy Board (PZ), Brabant Water, Water Board Aa en Maas, Rabobank Bernheeze, Foundation for Applied Water Research (STOWA), NCB-fund and Ministry of Infrastructure and Environment (I&M). We want to thank the Dutch breeders association Plantum for the opportunity to take root samples in the VCU trials.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joachim Deru.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Deru, J., Schilder, H., van der Schoot, J.R. et al. Genetic differences in root mass of Lolium perenne varieties under field conditions. Euphytica 199, 223–232 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-014-1129-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-014-1129-x

Keywords

Navigation